Gus Ornstein's School of Sports » Tennessee

Scouting the 2008 QB’s

Gus — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:06:44 +0000

Here is the post that everyone has been waiting for, the quarterbacks. Take a look and see where they rank as well as their scouting reports and decide which QB you think that your team should draft to lead them for the next 10 years. As with every draft and with QB’s I am sure that someone on this list will come out of no where and be the next Tom Brady (6th round) and one of these guys that are projected to go at the top of the draft will turn into the next Akili Smith, or David Klingler. The draft is not an exact science, so take all of this info and play GM for the day and decide who you would take.

1	12	Ryan	Matt	Boston College	QB	6046v	228v	4.95v	I
	Chance to be a very good one. Can make all of the necessary throws Accurate in the short and intermediate zones. Will throw off back foot some, but his forte was throwing the seam passer. Smart player who won’t be overwhelmed. Better from the gun then from under the center. Had some questions about his ability to see the underneath zone, but really liked this players stroke. Playing with a very limited surrounding cast. A one man show. Round # 1.
2	5	Flacco	Joe	Delaware U	QB	6063v	236v	4.86v	I
	Has outstanding size, body strength and an A-1 throwing arm. Was an accurate thrower who didn’t lose his composure in pressure situation. Very poised while posessing solid intangibles. Sorts things out well. Good ball placement on short and intermediate throws. Not a threat to run the ball, but can make time while showing good rush sense. Surprisingly effective throwing on the move. High ceiling player with strong 2nd round draft potential.
3	7	Henne	Chad	Michigan U	QB	6027v	230v	4.95v	I
	Experienced 4 year regular who played injured for much of 07. Has a very strong arm and was tough minded but I thought he was streaky with his accuracy, Throw mechanics need some work, and was marginal to escape, but I liked his overall game. Improved throwing touch and flair control. Was not a threat to run the football but is strong and can make time in the pocket. Played much of the 07 less then 100%. Round 2 draft consideration.
4	12	Brohm	Brian	Louisville U	QB	6027v	230v	4.85v	I
	Productive, experienced system quarterback. Accurate in the under zones and showed a relatively quick arm. Distributes the ball well and can manage the game effectively. Can’t move or get away from the blitz. Lacks a big arm. Marginal on intermediate or the deep ball accruacy. Had problems locating the backside backer on some under throws. Anoher in a long line of overrated Louisville QB’s. Back up playing potential. Mid to late second round consideration
5	10	Booty	John David	USC	QB	6023v	218v	4.93v	F
	Does nothing to get you real excited as a player, but is an efficient serviceable quarterback. Has an adequate throwing arm, was an accurate short and intermediate passer. Can throw effectively on the move. Good decision maker who is getting the most out of his ability. Football smart. I would today view him as a back up player within the league who when called upon could potentially contribute. 3th to 4th round draft potential.
6	3	Woodson	Andre	Kentucky U	QB	6040v	229v	4.86v	I
	Long deliberate throwing delivery. Didn’t sense the rush especially well and took too many sacks. Awkward touch passer and throwing on the move. Marginal deep passer. Good looking physically (strong and proportioned). System passer. More questions then answers; Read entire field? Process? Put ball in tight windows? Round 4 – 5 consideration
7	10	Brink	Alex	Washington St	QB	6022v	211v	5.02v	F
	Four year regular. Improved throwing release and delivery. Highly intelligent and experienced player. Needs work on his deep ball, but overall was both productive and efficient. Accurate passer in the under zones who was poised and made good throwing decisions. Improved throwing delivery and release point. Can throw from awkward positions and on the move. A whole lot better then I had expected. Late round (6 – 7) draft consideration
8	14	Morris	Bernard	Marshall U	QB	6030v	223v	4.76v	I
	Had 1 off field incident which might come into play. Biggest surprise of 2007. Top athlete, who can make time in the pocket, escape and spin the ball . Has a very live arm & although he had things he will need to improve (locks on his primary, will flush quickly and work receivers) I loved how he delivered the ball. Can stick it into a tight seam. Streaky with his accruacy. Has the tools to be something special down the line. Consider rounds 4.- 5
9	10	Ainge	Erik	Tennessee U	QB	6054v	225v	5.04v	F
	Is a big athlete good looking player a great deal of playing experience, but I was extremely disappointed in his arm strength, throwing accruacy (particularly deep) and decision making skills. Has an over the top throwing delivery but does not throw a tight ball. Was neither quick or highly mobile in the pocket. or as a runner. Didn’t see much in the way of creativity or instincts particularly when you consider his playing background. Round 6 – 7
10	14	Morelli	Anthony	Penn St	QB	6035v	231v	5.09v	F
	Has all the tools you look for in a QB; an athletic body, very strong throwing arm & far better movement then I had expected, but is acutely under coached & unprepared for the job of being a professional QB. Has a violent over hand delivery & when he’s on his game has as much ability as anyone in the draft. Can make all the throws; out, dig, fade and comeback, Going to have to start from square 1 with this player, but has a big upside. A 6th – 7th round steal.
11	15	Brennan	Colt	Hawaii U	QB	6023v	207v	4.95e	F
	System QB who has at best an adequate throwing arm and a very funky throwing delivery. Deep arm was highly questionable. Marginal ability to get away from pressure.Accurate and efficient on the underneath stuff. Is tough minded and showed good instincts. Has put up some unbelieveable throwing numbers, but his poor performance at the Senior Bowl and vs San Jose can also not be overlooked. Would give 6th to 7th round draft consideration.
12	7	O’Connell	Kevin	San Diego St	QB	6051v	223v	4.64v	I
	Athletic big man. Has a big arm but was inconsistent with his accuracy and ball placement. Has come a long way in the past season, but I still feel he has a very long way to come. Has impressive movement for a big man and threw adequately on the move. Led State in rushing in 2007. Has a chance. Late round draft (7) or priority free agent consideration.
13	11	Johnson	Joshua	U of San Diego	QB	6026v	213v	4.55v	I
	Is a good looking athlete who put up some very impressive numbers at a very low level of competition. Moves around well in the pocket showing both mobility and running skills. Don’t think he was a quick decision maker, but also didn’t put the football in harm’s way too often. Very effecient at a low level of play. Put up some very impressive numbers, but I don’t like his arm and will needs a great deal of work with his mechanics. Rd. # 7 or PFA
14	13	Ostrander	T.C.	Stanford U	QB	6021v	227v	5.00e	F
	Has a quick arm and was an effective passer underneath. Overall arm strength was at best adequate and I didn’t see much in the way of mobility or pocket presence. Felt he competed hard and made good decisions, but overall has just an outside chance of factoring at the pro level. Struggled some with the deep ball. Streaks of inaccuracy. Durability concerns. Has a chance to be a third, but really don’t see special skills with this player. 7th or priority free agent.
15	9	Keller	Sam	Nebraska U	QB	6035v	241v	5.03v	F
	Senior transfer with size and a strong arm, but doesn’t have the movement, quickness and or feet to play beyond this level of play. Streaky with accuracy and I would have to question his overall decision making skills. Good physical stature. Started quickly but appeared to regress as the season progressed. Doesn’t appear to know where people were on the field. A check down guy. Free agent with just an outside chance to factor.
16	8	Roach	Brad	Catawba	QB	6056v	250v	5.18v
	Has a strong arm and a quicker and more mobile then I originally expected. Is a three year regular. Is a three year regular with a quick compact throwing delivery. Showed adequate throwing accuracy (will work receivers some). Needs to use his lower half better. Marginal run skills, but showed the ability to aviod and make time in the pocket. Has little in the way of a surrounding cast. Possible late round selection, but more likely a priority free agent.
17	12	Smith	Paul	Tulsa U	QB	6012v	208v	4.97v
	Smith is a heady performer with good playing intangables. Is smart, aware and was an accurate thrower in the underneith zones. Got the ball out quickly always (cocked to throw), can look off defenders and made good throwing decisions. Has a barely adequate arm and was not imposing physically. Functional, but doesn’t have starting potential in my estimation. Possible late draft, but more likely a free agent. Possible third or practice squad performer.
18	2	Santos	Ricky	New Hampshire U	QB	6011v	215v	5.03v
	Very smart, experienced, productive and efficient. Prepares himseld well. Instinctive school yard type player in the Doug Flutie type mold. A four year regular who has put up some very impressive numbers during his college playing career. Was an accurate thrower who distributed the football well. Good anticipation ability to make plays. Appears shorter then then his listed height. Wouldn’t bet against him making it, but isn’t exactly what you are looking for.
19	3	Wright	Kyle	Miami U	QB	6033v	218v	4.90v
	Big good looking athlete who has been given every opportunity to succeed, but has never done it over the long haul. Has a strong arm and tools you look for, but is not an accurate passer nor did he make consistently good throwing decisions. Didn’t think he consistently threw the football on time and in all games viewed, really worked the receivers. I have to believe that the pro game is going to be just too fast for this player. Priority free agent.
20	15	Flynn	Matt	LSU	QB	6022v	231v	4.81v
	Has too many things to fix with this player’s throwing mechanics. Not an accurate passer on intermediate and deep throws. Barely adequate arm strength his ball appeared to have little life coming out of his hand. Didn’t look off defenser (stares down primary) dellivery quickness. Mobility and pocket presense were marginal. Did show both toughness and made some plays at critical times during the 07 season, but I see him as having just marginal play potential.
21	17	Hill	Nick	Southern Illinois U	QB	6025v	216v	4.85v
	Western Kentucky transfer. Left hand QB with better then expected athletic ability (former basketball player) Liked his size and the ability to make time with his feet. Made good throwing deceisons underneith. Didn’t like his throwing mechanics (very deliberate throwing stroke) and his arm was just adequate. Lots of things to fix (poor footwork), but has size and put up some impressive numbers. Free agent with practice squad potential
22	1	Lee	Xavier	Florida St	QB	6030v	233v	4.88v
	Top prep QB recruit with size and a very strong arm. Can get the ball out quickly when he sees things down the field. Can throw on the move and had adequate throwing accuracy. Is just not a quick processor and has been very inconsistent over his entire college playing career.. Has a strong athletic body and moved around surprisingly well, but the professional game is going to be just too fast for this individual. Developmental potential only. Game too fast.
23	10	Dixon	Dennis	Oregon U	QB	6032v	195v	4.60e
	Very thin and lacks the throwing mechanics you look for in a pro QB prospect. Has an adequate arm, but showed little touch and his mechanics were poor.. More of a dart thrower then a pure passer. Improved decision maker in 07, and really took to the new playing system,but in the end there are still far too many things to be fixed. Had a late season injury (Lt Knee ACL) and is also in the Atlanta Braves farm system. Wouldn’t consider with my club.
24	12	Mitchell	Blake	So Carolina U	QB	6026v	219v	4.95e
	Was a highly recruited prep player who did not come close to playing to his full playing potential at the college level. Has size, a good throwing arm snd more then adequate movement in the pocket. Was disappointed in his throwing accruacy and decision making. Showed a tendency to hold the football, but mechanically can get the ball out quickly. Has had some off the field problems and I would question his dependability. Too inconsistent in his play
25	15	O’Hara	Ryan	Central Oklahoma U	QB	6060e	230e
	Arizona and Scottsdale CC transfer. Has rare size and better throwing skills them I ex[ected. Good athlete also lettered in basketball at Arizona. Top prep QB prospect. Needs some help with his footwork, but his delivery was short and quick. Poor sourounding cast and injury limited his playing production in 2007 (6 TD’s and 13 Int) but I liked the way he spun the football. Going to have to work on ball placement and deep accruacy. Not a washout.

Scouting the 2008 TE’s

Gus — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:32:20 +0000

With the draft just a day away, it is finally time to reveal the scouting reports of the top offensive players in the country and we will start with the TE;s

3	28	Keller	Dustin	Purdue U	TE	6020v	242v	4.59v	G
	Very impressive athlete who only lacks size to become a top pro TE or H. Runs extremely well, has excellent body control, and hands to catch the ball on or off his person. A legitimate up the seam threat who flashed run instincts to go along with the strength to break secured tackles. Adequate blocker who initially gets into his block, but didn’t finish with any consistentcy. Will need to improve his overall functional play strength. Late 1 top of 2nd consideration.
1	83	Davis	Fred	USC	TE	6030v	255v	4.73v	G
	Outstanding prep wide receiver (10.8 100M). Is still in many ways a work in progres who has not come near his potential as a player.Good initial quickness on his get off. Got in and out of a break on his under routes while posing an up the seam threat. Improving as a blocker although needs to finish with far more consistentcy. Not there yet, but in time will give a club the best two way potential in this year’s draft. Possible 1st top of 2nd consideration.
2	13	Bennett	Martellus	Texas A&M	TE	6061v	259v	4.69v	I
	Has a great body and potentially is one talented football player. A physical player at the point of attack with very good body control particularly for a big man. Is much improved as a receiver. Had some concentration drops, but I like catching radius and his ability to win in traffic. Far more physical then I had originally expected. Can drop his weight and get in and out of a route effectively. Is young and said to be a “me guy” who will need to mature. Round 1 consideration.
4	89	Carlson	John	Notre Dame	TE	6051v	251v	4.89v	F
	Big, smart, athletic, experienced, instinctive football player. Felt he caught the ball well in the under zones although in not a true seam threat (lacks foot speed). Not really nifty after the catch, but did show some body strength, got north-south and worked to finish. Inline was an adequate blocker who came off flat backed, hit on the rise and stayed with his blocks. A solid back up early who could in time develop into a solid regular. Round # 3 draft consideration
5	82	Stevens	Craig	California U	TE	6032v	254v	4.63v	I
	An impressive ball player. Has a good frame to add bulk and strength, runs well and is very solid athlete. I felt he had wide receiver type hands and the quickness and speed to threaten up the seam. As a blocker, wasn’t either punishing or a big finisher, but was smart and efficient. Positions after contact (brings his feet around) and stays with blocks. Very good feet and balance. Solid H back prospect who should factor in the mid rounds (4th to 5th).
6	80	Cottam	Brad	Tennessee U	TE	6074v	270v	4.74v	I
	Injured for most of the 2007 season. Is extremely tall with long limbs and big hands. The best area of his game was without question in the passing game. Has very good hands, a wide receiving radius and was extremely difficut to stop in the under zones. Used his body to shield defenders from the football. Will have a difficult time functioning as a blocker at the pro level (high center of gravity – can’t leverage the point). Second day draft consideration
7	82	Rucker	Martin	Missouri U	TE	6047v	251v	4.71v	I
	A late bloomer who is a one dimentional TE prospect. Catches well and was a strong runner after the catch. Money in the bank in the under zones. Lacks the true speed to pose an up the seam threat. Is neither as quick or fast as I originally expected and lacks the essential core strength necessary to contribute at the point of attack. Played too high and got little or no movement. Needs to fit into your offensive scheme. Rd 3-4 draft consideration.
8	80	Freeman-Davis	Kellen	Michigan St	TE	6064v	262v	4.64v	E
	Has size and flashed catching skills. Has the ability to run down the seam, but I felt he was stiff and didn’t get in and out of his under routes especially well. Can’t and didn’t appear to have much “want to” blocking inline. Dropped too many balls in critical situations. A classic underachiever (should dominate in all aspects, but didn’t). High maintenance. Mid round consideration. Draft consideration rounds 4 – 5.
9	18	Tamme	Jacob	Kentucky U	TE	6034v	236v	4.59v	G
	In the right system could become a very effective player. Can run (straight line), catch and advance the ball. Good to find and settle in the zone hole. Outstanding ball skills. Smart player with great intangibles. Poses a vertical up the seam threat. Disappointing in traffic. Ineffective contributor within the running game (marginal blocker). Too stiff to play WR and not stout enough for TE. Draft consideration 4 – 5.
10	82	Barnidge	Gary	Louisville U	TE	6055v	243v	4.65v	J
	Has physical limitations; isn’t big by today’s standards, was stiff & mechanical in his movement and doesn’t have good play strength, but none the less is a very under rated ball player. Is smart, showed good route awareness, was tough, competitive, caught and advanced the ball up the field after the catch is going to have to improve his block skills, but should fill the role of a steady back-up TE within the league. 4 – 5 draft consideration
11	16	Finley	Jermichael	Texas U	TE	6042v	243v	4.85v	J
	Was injured for much of the 2007 season. Has rare size and a huge receiving radius and although realize he has a tremendous amount of playing potential, but I thought he lacked concentration and consistency. Tracks the ball extremely well. I particularly liked the way he adjusted to the deep ball. Very awkward getting into a lateral break (plants his heels). Still too many unknowns to consider this player in either of the first day
12	19	Finley	Joe Jon	Oklahoma U	TE	6062v	254v	4.95v	F
	A former prep quarterback with good hands and intelligence. Was effective in the under zones, but was not what I would consider an up the seam threat. Along the line of scrimmage is a try hard guy, but doesn’t have the leg strength and power to either sustain and or finish (does work at it) If he matures physically, I see him as factoring as a second or third tight end and special teams contributor. Has 5th to 7th round draft potential.
13	14	Strong	Darrell	Pittsburgh U	TE	6040v	268v	4.83v	I
	Has had some off the field and dedication issues. Prep quarterback and WR. Has excellent size for the position to go along with solid athletic skills, but has never been a fulltime regular at the position. Much improved in 2007 as a blocker and impressed me with his Hula Bowl receiving ability. In the passing game, I felt he needed room to be effective (didn’t see him win a contested battle for the football). See him as a solid back up at the professional level. Rounds 6-7.
14	80	Haynos	Joey	Maryland U	TE	6075v	266v	4.92v	F
	Has a basketball background. Good athlete who caught the ball well in the under zones. Can reach and extend for the ball . Wasn’t flashy or insitinctive, but turned it up and advanced the ball. Not a power player (may well be too tall). Has a very high center of gravity which made it difficult for him to leverage people inline. Not a washout, but will have to play in the right system in order to have any successful. Mid second day consideration (6th to 7th).

Scouting the 2008 Middle Linebackers

Gus — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:38:13 +0000

Here is an in depth look at the Middle Linebackers eligible for the 2008 NFL Draft.

1	55	Rivers	Keith	USC	MB	6022v	241v	4.59v	I
	Has outstanding playing skills, runs extremely well, and has very good playing instincts. Has absolutely great intangibles. Good first step quickness and the ability find the ball on the inside. Doesn’t linger on blocks and closes to the ball extremely well. Will fail to secure at times, but overall was a solid tackler. Versatile; could play all three linebacker positions and never has to come off the field in sub packages.
2	7	Mayo	Jerod	Tennessee U	MB	6012v	242v	4.59v	I
	Injured knee late in the 07 season. Young and has a ways to go in terms of strength and keeping his pads down (gets high). I loved his ability to both meet and defeat pressure inside. Smart player with very good instincts. Runs well and showed excellent playing range. Highly productive (Cal. / LSU) although needs more tackle strength. Very good zone drops and awareness (needs some work in man). Not near his full playing potential. 1st rd consideration.
3	40	Lofton	Curtis	Oklahoma U	MB	6000v	246v	4.71v	G
	A very impressive football player who had a tremendous amount of plays. Impacts the game. Great instincts for the football. Liked the way he filled inside (slips blocks, but also showed some explosive hands and good leverage. Sideline to sideline player. Drive through tackler who finished. Don’t see him as a match up guy in pass coverage, but his zone drops were good. Going to play quickly and contribute to winning football games.. Round # 1 consideration.
4	2	Bell	Beau	UNLV	MB	6015v	239v	4.89v	I
	Explosive hitter who plays hard and fast. Can leverage, play off and runs to the ball. Excellent speed and backside effort (motor runs on high all of the time. A big hitter (people go backwards on contact). Top teams potential at the professional level. Felt he was marginal in pass coverage (tends to play straight legged -limited reaction). Sustained an MCL injury in Senior Bowl. Late 2nd to top of 3rd draft potential.
5	56	Butler	Ezra	Nevada U	MB	6014v	245v	4.53v	I
	Down guy early who can play and space. Like the way he met pressure, shed and got to the football. Was both explosive on contact and freaky strong. Real force coming off the edge in nickel. Injured for much of the 07 season and didn’t play to the same level as he did in 06. A tad tight in coverage (needs work in this area). Excellent teams potential. Possible late 2nd and solid 3rd round draft potential.
6	1	Henderson	Erin	Maryland U	MB	6026v	244v	4.79v	F
	Has missed playing time due to injuries (knee reconstruction on 2005). Is not a take on guy (struggled to disengage from blocks inside – plays small). on the inside and I would have to question his overall playing instincts. Struggled some in pass coverage (breakdown in the open field). Was a productive in terms of total tackles who made plays outside the tackle box. Good range and tackling skills. Far from a complete player, but has some upside. Round 3 – 4.
7	7	Highsmith	Ali	LSU	MB	5115v	230v	5.01v	F
	A highly productive college football player who was short in stature, did not run well and was slow to react at times. Not impressive from an athletic standpoint, but you have to give him his due (made big plays at critical times). Not a take on guy, but effectively slipped blocks and got to the ball inside. Secured well as a tackler. Coverage skills marginal (limited depth with questionable route recognition and reactions). Not athletic enough for “Will” backer.
8	51	Larsen	Spencer	Arizona U	MB	6016v	238v	4.90v	F
	Productive player with good instincts and playing character. Somewhat disappointed in his take on skills but has a knack slipping blocks and getting to the football. In pass coverage I felt he was more then adequate settling and reacting in the under zones, but has limited man cover potential. Speed and overall range will limit him to the “Mike” backer position, but looks like a solid back up and special teams contributor. Has mid second day draft potential. Round 5 -6.
9	52	McClain	Jameel	Syracuse U	LB	6006v	249v	4.79v	G
	Inside LB prospect who will also line up at rush end in nickel. Plays with a lot of energy) and was a productive. Runs well and projects as a special team player. Some initial indecision in his play but when he saw it came hard. Will take on with the wrong shoulder and play entry was inconsistent but effort was good. In coverage (zone) got depth, but again struggled with his COD. A versatile hard working, old school player. Mid to late round potential (5-6).
10	9	Hall	Vince	Virginia Tech	LB	5110v	232v	4.94v	G
	A durable, experienced, highly productive football player who possesses just adequate athletic ability. Was not especially pretty in a uniform and doesn’t run well, but made a lot of plays. I really liked his playing smarts, but I was disappointed in his ability to take on and play off blocks (got bounced around inside). Struggles in pass coverage. Lacks range, movement although did read and react to things in the under zones. Good player but has real limitations
11	47	Goff	Jonathon	Vanderbilt U	MB	6020v	245v	4.71v	F
	Appeared somewhat top heavy. Is an experienced hands with playing smarts and more then adequate range, but I was disappointed with his overall take on skills on the inside. Got walled off and had a tendency to hang on blocks. Inconsistent to wrap up inside, particularly in space. A far more effective player in pass coverage. Got depth in his zone drops and sorted it out quickly. Looks like a “Sam”, but lack of take on ability concerns me. Late draft consideration.
12	41	Williams	Thomas	USC	MB	6011v	227v	4.79v	G
	Starting primarily as a result of injuries, but showed a solid skill level.. Liked his play instincts and football smarts. Unselfish player with a lot of heart and playing toughness. See him as a limited area player (not going to get to the boundary) and I don’t believe him to be as a true asset in pass coverage. Not a fast twitch athlete. Didn’t see top play speed or a closing burst. Late round consideration, but is more likely a priority free agent within the league.
13	47	Leman	Jeremy	Illinois U	MB	6016v	245v	4.95e	G
	Make a lot of plays, but is as limited an athlete as there is in this year’s player draft. Tough and highly instinctive. Was non explosive on contact and just doesn’t run well. Very limited play range. Took intelligent angles and played very hard, but doessn’t have the speed or closing burst. Tight in his lower body (hips), which seriously limits his participation in coverage. That being said, has to much smarts and heart not to play, but just isn’t the answer. Rd. 7 or PFA
14	48	Lansanah	Danny	Connecticut U	MB	6003v	248v	4.74v	G
	Has some athletic ability, but I felt he was somewhat of an underachiever. Good first step movement and playing instincts, but again was not explosive on contact (not sure if he’s the nasty thug team’s look for in the middle). Has the talent to play, but somebody need too light a fire under him (always looks to be costing – no urgency). If he mentally ready in camp has a real chance of factoring as a back up special teams performer. Late compensatory or PFA
15	42	Floyd	Dante	New Mexico St	MB	5110e	235e	4.75e	G
	Unranked, undersized transfer (LaneyJC) inside linebacker who impressed me with his effort, tenacity and production. Good athletic ability. Playing in an unusuall 3-3-5 scheme where he led his team in tackles in 07. Played inside runs well when he was protected and allowed to run to the ball. Good range and a very good wrap-up tackler with some pop. Not a fit for every club, but project high as a special teams and contributing back up. Late round (7th) or PFA.
16	59	Moffitt	Ben	South Florida U	MB	6007v	224v	4.67v	F
	Great young man who loves the game. Try hard guy but was very stiff and had a particularly tough time getting off blocks. Got bounced around pretty good on the inside (catcher) Very much a limited area player who wasn’t stout on the inside. Looked more comfortable in coverage. Got depth in his drops and sorted things out quickly. Can run with the TE or RB on flat and arrow routes. Has a outside chance of being drafted late, but was more likely a priority FA.