Summer Football Camps

July 30th, 2008 — football, football camps, recruiting, scholarships

By Gus Ornstein

I went to a tiny high school in New York City known more for its academics than its athletics, yet I received over 50 scholarship offers to play division one football and ended up at Notre Dame before transferring to Michigan State. People ask me all the time how I got discovered and my answer is simple- I went to summer football camps. The summer after my junior year, I attended a couple of different football camps, I went to the University of Wesleyan, Princeton University and The University of Michigan. I chose Wesleyan and Princeton because I was not sure how good I was, yet I knew I was doing well in school and thought these could be great schools for me. As far as going to Michigan’s camp, I figured that I had nothing to lose and should take a shot and see what the rest of the competition was like. Michigan’s football camp ended up being the thing that put me on the map as far as recruiting goes. They had over 1500 kids at the camp and it seemed like half of them were QB’s. I ended up having a great camp and one afternoon they ran a mini combine by taking the top players at each position and putting them through some drills. I was fortunate enough to be chosen to participate in this and had the opportunity to show my skills not only to the University of Michigan Staff but to all of the other coaches from different university’s around the country. The key to going to football camp at a big school is the amount of coaches they hire to work the camp and that these coaches come from different colleges and universities from around the country and from all different levels of competition. Even if you are not destined to be a division one player, you can still be discovered by one of these other schools.

Lloyd Carr- University of Michigan

As the camp came to an end, I was approached by then offensive coordinator Cam Cameron who told me that Michigan head coach, Gary Moeller wanted to see me in his office. I was so thrilled and excited that the head coach of The University of Michigan actually wanted to speak with me before leaving the camp. I went straight to his office and sat there as he told me they were extremely interested in me as a prospect and would be following me through my senior season and would be in touch. I feel very strongly that had I not attended that camp, I would have never been recruited as heavily as I was.

Princeton Football

Will Proctor who played quarterback at the University of Clemson had a very similar situation coming out of a small school in Florida and I spoke to him about that experience.

Will Proctor- University of Clemson QB

Will Proctor Interview

No Comments

Scouting the 2008 QB’s

April 25th, 2008 — football, NFL, NFL Draft

Here is the post that everyone has been waiting for, the quarterbacks. Take a look and see where they rank as well as their scouting reports and decide which QB you think that your team should draft to lead them for the next 10 years. As with every draft and with QB’s I am sure that someone on this list will come out of no where and be the next Tom Brady (6th round) and one of these guys that are projected to go at the top of the draft will turn into the next Akili Smith, or David Klingler. The draft is not an exact science, so take all of this info and play GM for the day and decide who you would take.

1 12 Ryan Matt Boston College QB 6046v 228v 4.95v I
Chance to be a very good one. Can make all of the necessary throws Accurate in the short and intermediate zones. Will throw off back foot some, but his forte was throwing the seam passer. Smart player who won’t be overwhelmed. Better from the gun then from under the center. Had some questions about his ability to see the underneath zone, but really liked this players stroke. Playing with a very limited surrounding cast. A one man show. Round # 1.

Matt Ryan
2 5 Flacco Joe Delaware U QB 6063v 236v 4.86v I
Has outstanding size, body strength and an A-1 throwing arm. Was an accurate thrower who didn’t lose his composure in pressure situation. Very poised while posessing solid intangibles. Sorts things out well. Good ball placement on short and intermediate throws. Not a threat to run the ball, but can make time while showing good rush sense. Surprisingly effective throwing on the move. High ceiling player with strong 2nd round draft potential.

Joe Flacco
3 7 Henne Chad Michigan U QB 6027v 230v 4.95v I
Experienced 4 year regular who played injured for much of 07. Has a very strong arm and was tough minded but I thought he was streaky with his accuracy, Throw mechanics need some work, and was marginal to escape, but I liked his overall game. Improved throwing touch and flair control. Was not a threat to run the football but is strong and can make time in the pocket. Played much of the 07 less then 100%. Round 2 draft consideration.

Chad Henne
4 12 Brohm Brian Louisville U QB 6027v 230v 4.85v I
Productive, experienced system quarterback. Accurate in the under zones and showed a relatively quick arm. Distributes the ball well and can manage the game effectively. Can’t move or get away from the blitz. Lacks a big arm. Marginal on intermediate or the deep ball accruacy. Had problems locating the backside backer on some under throws. Anoher in a long line of overrated Louisville QB’s. Back up playing potential. Mid to late second round consideration

Brian Brohm
5 10 Booty John David USC QB 6023v 218v 4.93v F
Does nothing to get you real excited as a player, but is an efficient serviceable quarterback. Has an adequate throwing arm, was an accurate short and intermediate passer. Can throw effectively on the move. Good decision maker who is getting the most out of his ability. Football smart. I would today view him as a back up player within the league who when called upon could potentially contribute. 3th to 4th round draft potential.
6 3 Woodson Andre Kentucky U QB 6040v 229v 4.86v I
Long deliberate throwing delivery. Didn’t sense the rush especially well and took too many sacks. Awkward touch passer and throwing on the move. Marginal deep passer. Good looking physically (strong and proportioned). System passer. More questions then answers; Read entire field? Process? Put ball in tight windows? Round 4 – 5 consideration
7 10 Brink Alex Washington St QB 6022v 211v 5.02v F
Four year regular. Improved throwing release and delivery. Highly intelligent and experienced player. Needs work on his deep ball, but overall was both productive and efficient. Accurate passer in the under zones who was poised and made good throwing decisions. Improved throwing delivery and release point. Can throw from awkward positions and on the move. A whole lot better then I had expected. Late round (6 – 7) draft consideration
8 14 Morris Bernard Marshall U QB 6030v 223v 4.76v I
Had 1 off field incident which might come into play. Biggest surprise of 2007. Top athlete, who can make time in the pocket, escape and spin the ball . Has a very live arm & although he had things he will need to improve (locks on his primary, will flush quickly and work receivers) I loved how he delivered the ball. Can stick it into a tight seam. Streaky with his accruacy. Has the tools to be something special down the line. Consider rounds 4.- 5
9 10 Ainge Erik Tennessee U QB 6054v 225v 5.04v F
Is a big athlete good looking player a great deal of playing experience, but I was extremely disappointed in his arm strength, throwing accruacy (particularly deep) and decision making skills. Has an over the top throwing delivery but does not throw a tight ball. Was neither quick or highly mobile in the pocket. or as a runner. Didn’t see much in the way of creativity or instincts particularly when you consider his playing background. Round 6 – 7
10 14 Morelli Anthony Penn St QB 6035v 231v 5.09v F
Has all the tools you look for in a QB; an athletic body, very strong throwing arm & far better movement then I had expected, but is acutely under coached & unprepared for the job of being a professional QB. Has a violent over hand delivery & when he’s on his game has as much ability as anyone in the draft. Can make all the throws; out, dig, fade and comeback, Going to have to start from square 1 with this player, but has a big upside. A 6th – 7th round steal.
11 15 Brennan Colt Hawaii U QB 6023v 207v 4.95e F
System QB who has at best an adequate throwing arm and a very funky throwing delivery. Deep arm was highly questionable. Marginal ability to get away from pressure.Accurate and efficient on the underneath stuff. Is tough minded and showed good instincts. Has put up some unbelieveable throwing numbers, but his poor performance at the Senior Bowl and vs San Jose can also not be overlooked. Would give 6th to 7th round draft consideration.
12 7 O’Connell Kevin San Diego St QB 6051v 223v 4.64v I
Athletic big man. Has a big arm but was inconsistent with his accuracy and ball placement. Has come a long way in the past season, but I still feel he has a very long way to come. Has impressive movement for a big man and threw adequately on the move. Led State in rushing in 2007. Has a chance. Late round draft (7) or priority free agent consideration.
13 11 Johnson Joshua U of San Diego QB 6026v 213v 4.55v I
Is a good looking athlete who put up some very impressive numbers at a very low level of competition. Moves around well in the pocket showing both mobility and running skills. Don’t think he was a quick decision maker, but also didn’t put the football in harm’s way too often. Very effecient at a low level of play. Put up some very impressive numbers, but I don’t like his arm and will needs a great deal of work with his mechanics. Rd. # 7 or PFA
14 13 Ostrander T.C. Stanford U QB 6021v 227v 5.00e F
Has a quick arm and was an effective passer underneath. Overall arm strength was at best adequate and I didn’t see much in the way of mobility or pocket presence. Felt he competed hard and made good decisions, but overall has just an outside chance of factoring at the pro level. Struggled some with the deep ball. Streaks of inaccuracy. Durability concerns. Has a chance to be a third, but really don’t see special skills with this player. 7th or priority free agent.
15 9 Keller Sam Nebraska U QB 6035v 241v 5.03v F
Senior transfer with size and a strong arm, but doesn’t have the movement, quickness and or feet to play beyond this level of play. Streaky with accuracy and I would have to question his overall decision making skills. Good physical stature. Started quickly but appeared to regress as the season progressed. Doesn’t appear to know where people were on the field. A check down guy. Free agent with just an outside chance to factor.
16 8 Roach Brad Catawba QB 6056v 250v 5.18v
Has a strong arm and a quicker and more mobile then I originally expected. Is a three year regular. Is a three year regular with a quick compact throwing delivery. Showed adequate throwing accuracy (will work receivers some). Needs to use his lower half better. Marginal run skills, but showed the ability to aviod and make time in the pocket. Has little in the way of a surrounding cast. Possible late round selection, but more likely a priority free agent.
17 12 Smith Paul Tulsa U QB 6012v 208v 4.97v
Smith is a heady performer with good playing intangables. Is smart, aware and was an accurate thrower in the underneith zones. Got the ball out quickly always (cocked to throw), can look off defenders and made good throwing decisions. Has a barely adequate arm and was not imposing physically. Functional, but doesn’t have starting potential in my estimation. Possible late draft, but more likely a free agent. Possible third or practice squad performer.
18 2 Santos Ricky New Hampshire U QB 6011v 215v 5.03v
Very smart, experienced, productive and efficient. Prepares himseld well. Instinctive school yard type player in the Doug Flutie type mold. A four year regular who has put up some very impressive numbers during his college playing career. Was an accurate thrower who distributed the football well. Good anticipation ability to make plays. Appears shorter then then his listed height. Wouldn’t bet against him making it, but isn’t exactly what you are looking for.
19 3 Wright Kyle Miami U QB 6033v 218v 4.90v
Big good looking athlete who has been given every opportunity to succeed, but has never done it over the long haul. Has a strong arm and tools you look for, but is not an accurate passer nor did he make consistently good throwing decisions. Didn’t think he consistently threw the football on time and in all games viewed, really worked the receivers. I have to believe that the pro game is going to be just too fast for this player. Priority free agent.
20 15 Flynn Matt LSU QB 6022v 231v 4.81v
Has too many things to fix with this player’s throwing mechanics. Not an accurate passer on intermediate and deep throws. Barely adequate arm strength his ball appeared to have little life coming out of his hand. Didn’t look off defenser (stares down primary) dellivery quickness. Mobility and pocket presense were marginal. Did show both toughness and made some plays at critical times during the 07 season, but I see him as having just marginal play potential.
21 17 Hill Nick Southern Illinois U QB 6025v 216v 4.85v
Western Kentucky transfer. Left hand QB with better then expected athletic ability (former basketball player) Liked his size and the ability to make time with his feet. Made good throwing deceisons underneith. Didn’t like his throwing mechanics (very deliberate throwing stroke) and his arm was just adequate. Lots of things to fix (poor footwork), but has size and put up some impressive numbers. Free agent with practice squad potential
22 1 Lee Xavier Florida St QB 6030v 233v 4.88v
Top prep QB recruit with size and a very strong arm. Can get the ball out quickly when he sees things down the field. Can throw on the move and had adequate throwing accuracy. Is just not a quick processor and has been very inconsistent over his entire college playing career.. Has a strong athletic body and moved around surprisingly well, but the professional game is going to be just too fast for this individual. Developmental potential only. Game too fast.
23 10 Dixon Dennis Oregon U QB 6032v 195v 4.60e
Very thin and lacks the throwing mechanics you look for in a pro QB prospect. Has an adequate arm, but showed little touch and his mechanics were poor.. More of a dart thrower then a pure passer. Improved decision maker in 07, and really took to the new playing system,but in the end there are still far too many things to be fixed. Had a late season injury (Lt Knee ACL) and is also in the Atlanta Braves farm system. Wouldn’t consider with my club.
24 12 Mitchell Blake So Carolina U QB 6026v 219v 4.95e
Was a highly recruited prep player who did not come close to playing to his full playing potential at the college level. Has size, a good throwing arm snd more then adequate movement in the pocket. Was disappointed in his throwing accruacy and decision making. Showed a tendency to hold the football, but mechanically can get the ball out quickly. Has had some off the field problems and I would question his dependability. Too inconsistent in his play
25 15 O’Hara Ryan Central Oklahoma U QB 6060e 230e
Arizona and Scottsdale CC transfer. Has rare size and better throwing skills them I ex[ected. Good athlete also lettered in basketball at Arizona. Top prep QB prospect. Needs some help with his footwork, but his delivery was short and quick. Poor sourounding cast and injury limited his playing production in 2007 (6 TD’s and 13 Int) but I liked the way he spun the football. Going to have to work on ball placement and deep accruacy. Not a washout.

No Comments

Scouting the 2008 WR’s

April 25th, 2008 — football, NFL, NFL Draft

Here is a look at the playmakers of 2008, your WR’s:

1 4 Kelly Malcolm Oklahoma U WR 6036v 224v 4.50e I
Impressive looking player with excellent hands, body control & ability to adjust to the ball. Catches equally well on or off his person. Uses size to effectively shield defender on under routes or in the red zone. Has the athletic ability & strength to avoid the hold up and the speed to climb a defender on his open releases. Liked ability to snatch the ball away from his body. Should factor quickly as an inside receiver & develop into a frontline player.

Malcolm Kelly
2 5 Thomas Devin Michigan St WR 6017v 216v 4.43v I
Has excellent athletic skills, versatility, good hands, and was a real threat after the catch. Runs well and showed the ability to accelerate at the top of the route. Potential # 1 receiver with a club. Top return potential (quick, instinctive, breaks tackles and has a burst). Six catches as a soph and 79 as a junior. Used mostly on slip screens and shallow screens. Round 1 draft consideration
3 86 Manningham Mario Michigan U WR 5116v 181v 4.45v G
A talented receiver who runs well in his pads. Is a proven commodity with athletic ability who makes big game changing plays on the football. Showed a good take off on open releases and broke off a point effectively. Excellent tracking skills paticularly on the deep ball and has soft hands (don’t watch Ohio St). Changes speeds well and will contribute within the running game. Late 1 top of the 2nd draft consideration.
4 5 Caldwell Andre Florida U WR 6002v 204v 4.38v I
Go to receiver who has regained the foot speed he had prior to his knee surgery. Has size, experience & has been a very productive player. Works underneath effectively. Solid run after skills. Impressive getting in and out of a break on speed cuts. Gets head around & locates the ball. I really liked his work at the senior bowl, where he showed his skills and savvy. Bigger, faster & more powerfully built then what I remembered. Mid 2nd round draft
5 9 Doucet Early LSU WR 6001v 209v 4.53v F
Skilled receiver with size, speed, quicks, body control & hands. Gets head around and in and out of a break well. Adequate RAC and instincts. Had problem with him running the in route from the left side (too much chopping). Can avoid the hold up effectively with both power & finesse releases. Will work away from the ball and contribute in the run game. Bottom of the 1st round top of the 2nd draft potential. Not a great one but has few holes. Anquan Boldin clone.
6 2 Avery Donnie Houston U WR 5111v 182v 4.36v I
A very fluid, talented athlete. Explosive on his take off. Closes the cushion quickly & got in and out of a break extremely well. Has good but not exceptional hands. Showed courage & has the ability to make the difficult off target catch. After the catch was dangerous in space and when he saw a crack, he was gone. Had some problems with his deep over the shoulder adjustments & didn’t always finish vertically. Should contribute quickly. Round 2 consideration.
7 4 Sweed Limas Texas U WR 6037v 215v 4.56v F
Was injured for much of the 2007 season. Has rare size and a huge receiving radius and although realize he has a tremendous amount of playing potential, but I thought he lacked concentration and consistency. Tracks the ball extremely well. I particularly liked the way he adjusted to the deep ball. Very awkward getting into a lateral break (plants his heels). Still too many unknowns to consider this player in either of the top two rounds.
8 1 Jackson DeSean California U WR 5096v 169v 4.39v G
Undersized “Z” receiver with rare speed & as natural a pass catcher as there is in this year’s draft. An outstanding athlete with rare quickness and body control. Comes out of a break with a lot of juice. Works back to the ball with confidence & can snatch it away from his body. lightening in the bottle after the catch. Dangerous punt return man who can take it to the house. Will get lazy in his routes and lose his concentration. Acutely undersized. Round 2 – 3
9 85 Douglas Harry Louisville U WR 5112v 176v 4.54v G
Talented player with rare timed speed. Is quick, fast, smart, tough and competitive. Gets in and out of a break well although I felt he got open more by scheme rather then by individual routes. Excellent instincts run vision. On the negative side, he is really small (can he hold up)? Competed inside, seldom won in traffic. Dropped far too many balls on contact. Is a ball player, but I wouldn’t roll the dice too soon on this player. Round 2 – 3 consideration
10 27 Nelson Jordy Kansas St WR 6025v 217v 4.53v I
Top nickel and inside receiving prospect. Has size and can uncover effectively underneath. Good zone awareness and ability to catch on and off his person. Will catch on contact and gets N-S quickly.Is sneaky fast, but lacks the juice to run away from the top defenders in the NFL Can make the difficult catch and showed good sideline awareness. Good block effort (adequate results). Is going to surprise a lot of people at the pro level. Round 3-4.
11 4 Royal Eddie Virginia Tech WR 5095v 184v 4.46v G
Little man, who was both quick and fast. Has good hands but likes the ball in on his body whenever possible. Has small hands and a short receving radius. Has the quicks and feet to avoid the hold up, but was more effective lining up in the slot. Can track down the field, but doesn’t offer the QB much in the way of a target. Questionable to win in traffic. Adept KO and punt returner; catches well, hits the crease and goes. Gd courage and judgement. Round 3 – 4.
12 82 Hardy James Indiana U WR 6053v 217v 4.53v F
Early entrant into draft. IU records for receptions (191) yards (2,740) and TD (36). Played 2 years of basketball before focusing totally on football. Rare size, firm hands and physical dexterity. Has good speed but doesn’t have quick speed. Wasn’t physical or creative as a runner after the catch and did little to nothing away from the ball (won’t block). Gave up on balls far too quickly and goes down too easily after the catch.Primarily a red zone threat at this stage.
13 21 Moore Kenneth Wake Forest U WR 5106v 195v 4.50v G
Productive and very tough inside receiver. Former RB with very good hands (will catch on contact). Ran predominately choice routes between the numbers with no fear or apprehension. Showed running strength and was creative after the catch. Runs well, but I question whether he has the juice to separate vertically at the next level. A highly dependable return man who should factor at the pro level as a multi-purpose inside slot receiver. Round 4 – 5.
14 19 Burton Keenan Kentucky U WR 6004v 201v 4.49v I
Really like this players overall game. Competes very hard in both games and practice and prepares himself like a pro on game week. Has good hands, playing smarts and position awareness, but does not play near as fast as his timed speed. I didn’t see any glaring negatives in this player’s game, but he also may not have a true long suit (non factor vs LSU and Vandy). Don’t see starting potential, but should factor as a back up, returner and special teams performer.
15 19 Hubbard Paul Wisconsin U WR 6026v 221v 4.48v F
Outstanding size and speed / top prep triple jumper in the country. Very limited playing production in 07. Drops too many easy ones in my opinion to be considered with the top level of receivers. Good body control and route quickness. Can adjust on the move and find the open area. Skilled player, but just does not play to his timed speed. A 3rd receiver type who with experience could develop into a functional second. Has 3-4 round draft potential.
16 14 Shields Arman Richmond U WR 6006v 193v 4.40v I
Played in only two games in 07. An athlete with size, firm hands & tracking ability. Closes the cushion quickly on his open release & can track the ball downfield. On his under routes drops his base & got in and out of his routes (some flag). Uses his body to effectively shield the defender from the ball & will catch in contact. Adjusts on the move and sat in the zone hole effectively. Good teams background although is not a returner.Solid middle rd potential (4-5).
17 19 Simpson Jerome Coastal Carolina WR 6016v 198v 4.44v I
Good body control, size and the ability track & catch the ball.. Is smart and adaptable, but was raw and underdeveloped in terms of athletic ability & position skills (question route running skills & speed to separate).. Loved the way he went upcompeted for the ball in traffic. Simply “out athletes” people at this level of play. A semi long stride, who was not a burner, but there is no question as to his ability to make the difficult catch..5th to 7th consideration.
18 10 Bennett Earl Vanderbilt U WR 5114v 209v 4.52v F
Productive, game ready player. Has quick feet, and got in and out of his routes well and was a confident catcher. Good zone awareness. Made easy adjustments to off target throws. Can make the difficult catch and showed sideline awareness. Don’t see a lot of foot speed or vertical separation skills. I see him as a steady contributing nickel receiver. Similar to the Giants Steve Smith in playing style. Should be given solid 4th round consideration.
19 22 Hall D.J. Alabama U WR 6017v 193v 4.59v F
A some off the field baggage which will need to be addressed at the scouting combine and spring workouts. Early on didn’t buy into Saban’s program, but came around during the fall. Has been a playmaker over his career. Has size, very good physical dexterity and showed the ability to track ball and separate vertically. Will drop balls (concentration) and his timed speed is not near what I expected. Late 3rd to early 4th consideration.
20 22 Alridge Anthony Houston U WR 5090v 170v 4.39v G
College running back who also alligns in the slot. Has rare speed and quickness. Is undersized but showed excellent running instincts. Has feet, body control and balance, but was not as fluid out of a laterall break as I expected him to be. Will need some refinement of skills, and isn’t a big man, but has a chance to be something special as a receiver, KOR and special situation back.Not a believer; see UTEP, Oregon, and Rice. Draft consideration round 3 – 4.
21 13 Johnson Steve Kentucky U WR 6017v 210v 4.52v F
Late bloomer. Has size and straight speed but was very inconsistent as an underclassman. Much improved hands confidence and playing toughness. Wouldn’t work inside the numbers in the past, and although isn’t a sure thing in this area has improved a good deal. Don’t think he is a natural catcher, but my gut tells me we haven’t seen the best from this player yet. Size and speed are a hard combination to beat. Has strong early second day consideration
22 9 Bryant Dorien Purdue U WR 5096v 174v 4.51v G
Up and down performer in 07.Has outstanding speed and a vertical burst (can run by you). Is undersized & didn’t catch the ball as clean as one would want. Dangerous in the open field & as a return man. Did little away from the ball or within the running game. Awful blocker (very little effort). Pain in the butt, but not a bad kid. Talks too much. Literally took over the Iowa game. Similar, but not as explosive as Ted Ginn. Round 3-4 consideration.
23 3 Franklin Will Missouri U WR 6004v 214v 4.39v I
Has size & real talent, but was disappointed in his overall game, Wasn’t tough & didn’t make plays in competitive situation. After the catch will hit the deck when he sensed body heat (watching too many pro games). Virtually all of his production was outside the hash & underneith. Does show route quicks & has the body control to be outstanding in this area. Top talent, but is not the same player when the bullets start to fly. Round 3-5 consideration.
24 2 Morgan Josh Virginia Tech WR 6002v 219v 4.45v I
I really liked his physical stature and speed, but does not have natural hands (dropped far too many balls). Has track speed, but will clutch to start, thus negating his both quicks and explosive in his open releases. Vs the press, will gives up chest off the go. Has good hands and can stem a route effectively but his uneven concentration and attention to detail bothers me (2 drops vs UNC).
25 12 Bowman Adarius Oklahoma St WR 6027v 223v 4.77v F
Has been a productive player since transferring from UNC in 2005, but I was rather disappointed in his play at the senior bowl practices. Very stiff running style who didn’t show the speed to push a defender on his open releases.Can’t drop his hips on his under routes. I liked his size, but in my opinion was not a natural catcher. Mismatches many defenders and showed some strength after the catch, but wasn’t nifty or instinctive. Would not give this player 1st day draft consideration.
26 2 Reynaud Darius West Virginia U WR 5092v 201v 4.51v G
Talented athletic receiver who caught a majority of his passes on bubble and slip screens, hitches and shallow crosses. Has firm hands, can make off target adjustments and catch on contact. Adept catching both off and on his person. After the catch, got north south quickly while showing creativity after the catch. showed a burst to run under the deep ball, but lacks the juice to separate vertically. Solid KOR prospect Late consideration who has a chance.
27 16 Purify Maurice Nebraska U WR 6031v 224v 4.53v F
Has size, athletic ability and body quicks. Firm hands & catching range, although his concentration level was not always evident. Runs well in his pads, but not a true race horse. Can break off a point on his under routes showing strength after the catch. High ceiling, but his position skills are far from fully developed. Add to the puzzle some highly publicized off the field issues and we see an incomplete puzzle developing. Risk – Reward Player Rd. 5-7.
28 81 Harper Justin Virginia Tech WR 6034v 213v 4.61v F
Has all of the physical qualities you look for in a professional receiver, something appears to be missing. Has good hands and was best on underneith routes where he caught the ball and turned up the field. Showed a tendency to breaks off his routes (doesn’t finish) Was neither coverage aware or very instinctive. Didn’t compete for the ball on the inside. Should be a dominent player but wasn’t. Draft consideration 5 – 6
29 85 Monk Marcus Arkansas U WR 6042v 221v 4.51v F
Big slot receiver who gives a club a huge miss match advantage particularly in the red zone or on crossing routes. Needs a pre release to consistently get into his routes. Can reach and extend away form the body. A special situation player who just doesn’t have the juice one looks for at the position. Wasn’t sudden in and out of a break and lack the top speed to separate vertically, but in the right offensive system could contribute significantly in the under zones. Round 4 to 5 draft potential.
30 7 Hawkins Lavelle California U WR 5110v 187v 4.59v F
A skilled receiver who showed come immaturity in the past (will pout and isn’t the toughest guy on the block. Has shown very good route running and catching skills. Was a dependable third down receiver working in the under zones and was adept working the sidelines. Gives you some added return potential. Lacks the deep speed to factor as a vertical threat, and doesn’t process quickly (need to keep it simple) Late round draft potential / 6-7
31 2 Jackson Dexter Appalachian St WR 5094v 182v 4.37v G
Little guy with a great deal of speed and quickness. Did some double catching but overall I thought he caught the ball well. Explosive in and out of a break. showed the ability to adjust and run under the ball on vertical routes. After the catch runs away from people in the open field. Not as savvy as David Patton, but has more more acceleration. In spite of his size, proved to be a tough guy on the inside. Round 6 to 7 consideration.
32 2 Blackman Darrell No Carolina St WR 5103v 210v 4.62v F
Former RB who has proven to be a tough versatile player. I liked his hands and his ability to catch with confidence. After the catch I liked his toughness and vision. Needs further route development, but feel this player has the skills to factor in a professional setting. Return skills only enhance this players overall potential . Not an instant study, but could contribute quickly in a number of ways. Has late second day draft potential. Round 6 – 7.
33 86 Henry Marcus Kansas U WR 6035v 207v 4.58v F
The star of the East West shrine game, was just a guy during the 07 season. Is a good atlete with size, but was an inconsistent catcher. Lacks route polish (raw) and his hands were inconsistent. Doesn’t create either after the catch or as a route runner (gets open by offensive design). Has a real chance (should be a good test athlete), but needs a great deal of development in his individual routes. Strong late round draft consideration (6 -7)..
34 4 Smith Tajiddin Syracuse U WR 6003v 187v 4.63v F
Bakersfield JC transfer. Is a great kid who has overcome a great deal in his life. Has graduated but will not return for a 6th year. Is smart, has good speed and ran good routes, but his hands were just adequate (Didn’t make any wow catches). Faster then combine timed speed. Going to have to make it as your 4th or 5th receiver since he does not play or have potential to play on teams. 6th to 7th round draft consideration.
35 11 Caddell Matt Alabama U WR 5103v 185v 4.42v G
I was really impressed with this players hands, body control and overall body dexterity (made some very good off target adjustments in games viewed). Smooth route runner who can track and adjust to the ball. Has speed (sneaky fast), but lacks the juice to consistently separate vertically from defenders. Will contribute within the running game. Round 6 – 7
36 1 Garcon Pierre Mount Union College WR 5117v 210v 4.44v I
Good looking player from a physical and athletic standpoint. Has been dominant player at this level of competition (D-III), although was very impressive when he lined up on the big stage (post season all star game). Not elusive, but was a strong instinctive runner after the catch. Had some problems coming out of his break on his underneith routes. Need a great deal of position developmental work, but has size and skills. Round 6 – 7.
37 4 Smith Marcus New Mexico U WR 6012v 221v 4.59v F
Former RB who made the transition to a wide receiver position two season’s ago. Is a good looking individual physically (strong) Appeared very stiff as a route runner and although was strong, just doesn’t have the juice. Lacks separation speed on his intermediate and deep route. Has been very productive (91 catches for 1,125) using only about a third of the route tree, but only scored 4 TD’s. Would give late round consideration within the league.
38 1 Grice-Mullen Ryan Hawaii U WR 5100v 187v 4.55v G
Undersized inside receiver with skills but lacks vertical speed to separate vertically from defenders. Has been very productive within their passing game over the past two seasons, but his potential is further eroded by the fact that he is not a returner and due to his lack of size is not likely to factor as a special team’s player. Caught an amazing 237 passes and 36 TD’s over a three year career. Has a chance of being drafted, but is more likely a free agent
39 16 Arrington Adrian Michigan U WR 6027v 203v 4.57v F
Solid complimentary receiver. Has good athletic ability and size, but didn’t show the necessary speed to separate vertically and was unremarkable after the catch. If he can effectively play on teams, has a chance to make it as a 4th or 5th receiver. Worked away from the ball and ran pretty fair routes but there was nothing special in this players game. Would give late round consideration based on his size and moderate play production.
40 7 Bess Davone Hawaii U WR 5097v 194v 4.76v F
Highly productive inside receiver with good hands and after the catch run instincts . Has essentially turned his life around over the past three years after some juvenile problems. Has very good zone awareness and the ability to convert. Works back to the ball and was a dangerous runner after the catch. Does not run well on a clock, but plays fast. Sure handed effecient punt return man. Workout numbers were not impressive, but this guy is a football player.
41 84 Rivers Jason Hawaii U WR 6012v 200v 4.62v F
Not very tough nor was he very physical. Will drop in traffic and didn’t work inside the numbers with a lot of confidence. Would question his speed and deep separation skills. Said to be immature and mouthy, but is not considered a thug. Has good size and was effective in the short zones. Has late late round league draft potential but is more likely a priority free agent.
42 6 Robinson Kevin Utah St WR 5116v 196v 4.67v F
Has been an outstanding return man throughout his collegiate career. Is a play maker who can make things happen after the catch, but lacks the speed and surprisingly neither a polished route runner and or catcher.. I felt he got in and out of a route effectively, with adequate tracking skills. On deep routes, lacks the burst at the top of the route (didn’t separate vertically). Has a chance basically on the strength of his returns.
43 5 Raymond Paul Brown U WR 5091v 176v 4.39v G
Undersized raw talent with impressive tools, but at the outset is a very long way from playing at the professional level. Has the speed to flat out run away from people at this level., but routes were not precise or polished. A fast twitch athlete who was explosive on his take off from (open release). Not as productive as I would have expected and is acutely undersized. Kick returner background is a plus. Late potential, but is more likely priority FA
48 Carter Xavier LSU WR 6014e 180e 4.30e I
Left Squad prior to the start of the 2006 season to run in the pro track circuit.. Rare speed (might well be the fastest man in the world), has a powerful loping stride and eats up ground very quickly. Has a good frame (tight muscular body), adequate hands and very good athletic ability. Was an outstanding prep football player. Home run threat and an effective KOR man as a frosh and soph. Not natural stemmng a route. Probable Olympic team, but can’t overlook.
49 1 Schilens Chez San Diego St WR 6037v 208v 4.39v I
2007 season was slowed with a stress fracture to his right foot. Has rare size and straight speed. Wide catching radius. Played in only 8 games in 07 and caught 22 of his 35 passes in the final three games of the season. Does not play as fast as his timed speed. Long strider who was just adequate in and out of a break. Top rated prep baseball player (Tigers # 34 in 2003). Has too much size and speed to ignore. Late round or priority free agent consideration.
44 7 Urrutia Mario Louisville U WR 6053v 232v 4.63v F
Other then his physical stature, I didn’t see much that I liked about this player’s game. Drops far too many catch able balls, wasn’t tough inside, was a very stiff route runner, and lacks the speed to separate on vertical routes. Wasn’t a confident catcher and showed little in the way of route quickness. Somebody is going to draft this player, but I don’t see much that I liked about this player’s game.
45 8 Jenkins Darnell Miami U WR 5092v 187v 4.68v F
Good athletes with quickness, body control, and eye-hand coordination. Was disappointed with his overall speed, but I liked his play making ability. Has battled injuries throughout his playing career and is not as polished as one would expect coming from this program. Not special run instincts after the catch, but has made some big plays in 07. Late round or priority FA consideration.
46 12 Arthur Jabari Akron U WR 6033v 225v 4.65e F
A big Canadian, who was originally recruited to play quarterback. Catches everything thrown in his direction. A pure possession receive who worked effectively in the under zonesr. Is tall with long limbs and big hands, but is just not very fast. Can’t separate vertically but was surprisingly an impressive runner after the catch (broke secured tackles and showed some awareness in the open field). Draft consideration round # 7.
47 81 Fagg De’Cody Florida St WR 6012v 211v 4.66v F
Was injured at the 2008 combine (leg fx) which might well require him to miss the 2008 season. Has size and although not a natural catcher, I thought he did a good job of adjusting on or off his body. Tendency to round things off underneith. Not fast but can close the cushion on his open releases. Tracks the ball well on vertical routes. Built like a RB. Was effected by his teams lack of a consistentcy at QB, Late draft prior to injury. Not likely to be drafted
87 McIntosh Nicolas College of the Sequoias WR 6010e 185e 4.30e
Might well be the second fastest prep player in Florida history. State 100 and 200 meter champion. Signed with the U of Florida but did not qualify. Attended Dodge City CC (red shirted in 2004), before transferring to the College of the Sequoias. Haitian decent. Signed with Toronto of the CFL in 2007

3 Comments

Scouting the Offensive Tackles of 2008

April 24th, 2008 — football, NFL, NFL Draft

This is probably the most glamorous position on the offensive line, especially when we are talking about the left tackle. Of course Jake Long is at the top of this category and that is why he already has a deal in place with the Miami Dolphins to be the first pick on Saturday and he will be receiving $30 million in guaranteed money!!

Jake Long

Here are the rest of the tackles for this year:

1 77 Long Jake Michigan U OT 6070v 313v 5.25v I
Massive, smart and nasty. Comes off the ball, hit on the rise. took good angles, fit on blocks, sustained well and finished consistently. Doesn’t have LOT feet, but is a force who should play a very long time on the right side. I particularly liked his game in and game out consistency. Once he got his hands on people was very difficult to shed. Plays on his feet and was very aware. How quickly do you draft a right offensive tackle? Draft consideration Round 1
2 74 Williams Chris Vanderbilt U OT 6061v 315v 5.15v I
An athletic big man with quickness, body control, flexibility and balance. Smart player who comes off the ball, hits up and turns defender. Good power and finishing skills. Outstanding playing range and ability to adjust on the move at the second level. Not a great finisher but dominated none the less. Outstanding balance points, knee, and ankle bend.. Can control with punch. Outstanding ability to ride defender past the pocket. Round # 1 sure thing.
3 76 Otah Jeff Pittsburgh U OT 6060v 322v 5.57v I
Not a natural knee bender, but was a massive person, who used his hands well, sustained blocks, played on his feet and finished people inline. I liked the way he rolled into his sets and the way he moved his feet for a big man. On pass pro, I thought his sets were efficient and consistent. Good hand placement. Can come off the ball and maul people inline. Still developing but has real solid playing skills. Top round draft consideration
4 79 Clady Ryan Boise St OT 6061v 309v 5.24v I
Has outstanding feet, balance, and body control. Came off the ball with good pad level, hit on the rise with good hand placement. On pass protection, I felt his sets were efficient. Good depth on his kick step and slide. Did overplay and open outside shoulder some, but I liked his balance points and his ability to replaces hands. Has left tackle playing potential. Top round draft consideration.
5 79 Baker Sam USC OT 6045v 309v 5.52v I
Is smart, experienced and was a steady performer. Was impressed with some of the things he did on pass pro (hand placement). Has good feet, but was more of a finesse guy then a power player. Big man with short arms. Was not totally out of his element on the left side, but he had a tendency to open his outside shoulder up too quickly giving a defender an easy inside counter option. Played much of 07 with a hamstring injury. Round 1 - 2
6 77 Nicks Carl Nebraska U OT 6047v 341v 5.25v E
Big powerful athlete with feet and range (plays angry). Physical player who hits on the rise and finishes inline (best run blocker I’ve seen in 07). Excellent punching power. Showed the skills to work to the 2nd level and reach the playside backer. Said to have questionable work habit, is 25 years of age, and does not process things quickly. Needs more overall consistency, but has all of the tools one looks for at either tackle position. Early 2nd round potential.
7 77 Cherilus Gosder Boston College OT 6063v 314v 5.14v I
Minor off field incident needs to be addressed. Big athletic guy with good feet, balance and body quickness. Worked almost exclusively from a 2 point stance. Will come off the ball and strike, but overall wasn’t a big finisher. Was disappointed in his playing awareness (stunts, blitz pick ups and awareness at the second level). Has some nasty in him and looks like superman, but something (playing awareness) appears to be missing. Round # 2 consideration.
8 78 Collins Anthony Kansas U OT 6050v 317v 5.49v E
Lots of talent (LOT athletic) but is immature and an underachiever. Huge person with a long wing span, yet wasn’t explosive. Can make it look easy (almost appeared disinterested), but also was sloppy with is technique (hand use, crosses his feet). Can dominate at the LOS, has range and sustain blocks. Has a very high ceiling, but well could be a nightmare for the club that selects him. Wouldn’t consider at 1, but at the mid point of 2 might look like a prom queen.
9 54 Keith Brandon Northern Iowa U OT 6052v 345v 5.01v E
Outstanding physical skills and a pro body (long arms and thick all over), but is just not very tough nor was he physical in his play. Very talented athlete with every conceivable physical gift, but should have been far more dominent in his overall play. Loved his feet, can pull, lead, and adjust on the move, but he just wasn’t a consistent finisher. Needs to drop some body weight and improve stamina. Round 4 – 5 consideration
10 79 Hills Tony Texas U OT 6051v 309v 5.20e
Top prep tight end prospects in the country. Has overcome a great deal (physically) over the last 5 years (drop foot) and broke his ankle vs Texas Tech this past season. Has LOT feet, but also showed a tendency to overset and had a difficult time redirecting in space. A team is going to have to be patient with this player, but he has athletic ability long arms and the ability to bend his knees. Could well in time be a high rewards second day surprise. Round 5 – 7
11 78 Giacomini Breno Louisville U OT 6071v 304vv 5.10v J
Great looking physically. Outstanding prep basketball player. First year regular. Former tight end in their jumbo package. Runs extremely well, is very athletic, has good feet, physical and one nasty SOB on the ball field. Does need a lot of work with position technique, hand placement and most importantly his core strength. Didn’t show good bend on his pass sets, thus limiting his anchor. Has a lot of tools. Round 4 to 5 consideration
12 79 Richardson Barry Clemson U OT 6065v 320v 5.49v E
Athletic big man who flashed excellent body control. (nimble) Light on his feet with good blocing range (can get out to the second level. . On pass protection, has the athletic ability to counter and mirror defensive movement. Has been a regular since his freshman season, but I felt his mechanics were not particularly advanced. Just doesn’t play heavy.and to my way of thinking and not a natural knee bender. Round 4 – 5 , based on his natural gifts
13 77 Dunlap King Auburn U OT 6084v 311v 5.27v I
Has been just an verage worker. Huge frame with long limbs, but was underdeveloped. Showed little in the way of tenacity or toughness. Marginal knee bender and power in his hands (might be too tall). I’m bothered by the fact that he still needs to be pushed on and off field. Would also question his willingness to play through things. Wouldn’t trust on the left ot a left tackle. 5th to 6th round consideration based primarily on his rare size.
14 79 Bell Demetrius Northwestern St (LA) OT 6053v 300v 5.21v F
Recruited to play college basketball. Has only played 3 seasons of football. Former DE who was moved to LOT . 2007 Sub – division All American. Very good athlete, but lack both strength and power in his play. I was impressed with his pass sets, feet, body quickness, and overall playing range, but I wonder if he is strong enough to get push at the next level. Good hand placement. At least two year’s away from being contributing to winning
15 54 Clark Corey Texas A&M OT 6053v 315v 5.33v F
Might want to consider projecting this player down inside. Didn’t like his consistently high pad level when engaging defenders inline, but played on his feet and stayed with his blocks for the most part. Limited striking power. This guy wasn’t pretty, but found a way to fet it done in the end. Would give late round draft consideration within the league (6th to 7th).
16 76 Brown Duane Virginia Tech OT 6041v 314v 4.94v I
A former tight end who started two seasons on the right side before moving to the left side as a senior. Never saw him finish inline (didn’t show playing strength or much in the way of toughness). Really struggled with big people. I did like his feet and body balance on pass protection, but was bull rushed and had problems with his anchor. Not as good as he should be, but has too much athleetic potnetial to throw in the scrap heap. Round 6- 7.
17 77 Polumbus Tyler Colorado U OT 6074v 312v 5.23v F
A big man with short arms. Is a try hard guy, but was limited athletically. Has a particularly high center of gravity. Gets shoulders out over his pads consistently when blocking inline (top heavy). Not a big finisher (legs trail). On the ground too frequently. Marginal body quickness. Is going to have problems blocking on the edge or handling the inside counter.
18 54 Dunbar Franklin Middle Tennessee OT 6046v 327v 5.63v F
A massive, very strong (lower half) prospect who has been a starter at the LOT position for 3 seasons. The only true hardship case in this year’s draft. Is not a nifty, quick footed, dancing bear on the outside and doesn’t have any LOT potential at the next level. Lacks agility, body quickness, balance, bend and footwork. At the outset is going to have a very difficult time when the bullet start to fly (game pace). A solid person but strictly a developmental prospect.
19 72 Fladell Mike Rutgers U OT 6061v 328v 5.40e
Big wide body, who was generally non explosive on contact. Lack balance and body control particularly in space. Hits and goes to the ground. Needs to develop a great deal of body strength, particularly in his legs. Might well have been too tall to play inside at guard (LOG) position. Could develop, but the club that invests in him will have to dedicate a great deal of time to this project. Priority free agent.
20 75 Byrne Mike Delaware U OT 6050v 296v 5.45e
An Experienced competitive player. Has a good frame and size and strength potential. Is an agile big man. Agile big man with adequate playing and blocking range. Showed little in the way of power or explosion inline to get movement and sustain blocks. Falls off too many blocks (doesn’t bring feet) nor does he play heavy. Has some upside, but at this stage is at best a priority free agent.
21 75 Garner Nate Arkansas U OT 6040e 325e 5.60e
Is a big (bad body) guy who came on as a senior (late bloomer). Not a fast twitch athlete, but cam eoff the ball, stayed on his feet and sustained his blocks far more effectively then I had expected. On pass protection, short set effectively and although doesn’t have a whole lot of range showed some potential in this area. More of a mass then explosive hit up through guy. Much improved hand use. Priority free agent prospect.

1 Comment

Grading System Used by NFL

April 23rd, 2008 — football, NFL, NFL Draft

You have most likely noticed a letter grade listed all the way to the right of the players name on the scouting reports that I have been posting. I would imagine that everyone is wondering what that letter stands for, and I am about to clear it all up. The letter represents a grade that scouts give to players to help their teams decipher who it is that they are going to take in the draft.

The grading system breaks down as follows:

A— This type of player comes along every 20 years or so. Ex: John Elway or think 5 tool player if people out there are familiar with baseball scouting reports. This type of player has it all, the skill, intelligence, size, physical ability, leadership etc…

John ElwayJohn Elway

B—Same as an A player, but not as productive on the field due to circumstances outside of their control. Ex: Irving Fryar, the great WR, only had 9 catches in his senior year at Nebraska due to the offense they were running.

Irving Fryar Irving Fryar

C—Overall same qualities of an A player but this player is small. Ex: Barry Sanders

Barry SandersBarry Sanders

D— This is going to be a Pro Bowl player and is also the highest grade that an offensive lineman can recieve due to the fact that they don’t significantly change the game (they don’t score TD’s)

E—”Coach Killer” this is the classic underachiever, he might have the skill of an A,B, or C guy but doesn’t do it every play. this is the type of player that will take plays off and drive coaches crazy.

F—Overachiever. Ex: Mike Hart from Michigan, he is small and ran a 4.83 at the combine yet he rushed for over 1500 yards at Michigan this past season. Too many of these guys on a team will cause you to lose games.

G—Small player– maybe a good player but lacks the size. This is your 5’9″ corner.

H—Projection guy, this is the player that may be a QB in college but will be playing a different position in the NFL.

Ex: Matt Jones, QB at Arkansas and now a WR with the Jacksonville Jaguars

I—Teams are looking for I’s, they have all the equipment to be a great player. They have the size, and the speed to go with it. This is your 6’0 190LB CB/S that runs a 4.4, or your 6’2 215LB WR

J—Undersized player at this point but has the frame to be able to put the necessary weight on. Ex: Jason Taylor– If the player can put the weight on they can become an I player and if not they will become a G player

K— Has one or two critical faults, but has something that separates him from the normal population of civilians.

M— No football instinct, no feel for the game

Andy GatewayMarcus Pollard, Antonio Gates

N—Non Football athlete. This player may have not played football in college but there is something about him that makes you think he could be a good football player. Ex: Marcus Pollard, Antonio Gates

No Comments

2008 Linebackers

April 21st, 2008 — football, NFL, NFL Draft

Here is the scouting report for the class of 2008 linebackers. This report was compiled by NFL scout Tom Marino.

 

40 Connor Dan Penn St LB 6023v 231v 4.65e I
Is an experienced, aggressive, athlete with outstanding playing instincts. Loved his first step quicks, his key & diagnose and ability to get to the ball.  I liked the way he effectively stepped up and met the lead and his tackling ability. Got depth on his spot drops, settled and moved to the ball.  Good hands. The most talented Penn State LB in a quarter century. Some early off the field immaturity (pranks), but it’s absolutely not a problem. Should factor quickly. Round # 1.
52 Gooden Tavares Miami U LB 6012v 234v 4.63v G
Has a world of athletic ability and speed to burn. Has excellent playing range, change of direction and a real burst to the ball. Liked the way he met the lead in the hole.  Doesn’t linger on blocks.  Impressive in both man and zone coverage.  Reads and reacts to the ball in flight. Not a big man by today’s standards, but is what you are looking for at the position.  Top round consideration.
10 Hayes Geno Florida St LB 6007v 226v 4.67v G
Very good athlete with good playing range.  Competitive and very active on the inside. Slips blocks and flies to the ball. Looks and plays somewhat small.  Not a big takes on guy. Will backer prospect who will need to be protected.  Flies around and makes plays (solid tackler). In coverage got good depth, settled, read route, but has poor hands. Should factor early at the pro level. Excellent teams potential. Round 2 draft consideration.
41 Kehl Bryan Brigham Young U LB 6023v 238v 4.59v G
Really liked this prospect’s playing demeanor, athletic ability, range, playing instincts and most importantly his ability in pass coverage.  Also showed blitz speed and the ability alter his course to the ball. Is quick to read and react.  A leverage guy who needs to improve his point strength and explosiveness . Good ball skills and should factor quickly in nickel.  Draft consideration round 3 to 4
44 Dizon Jordon  Colorado U LB 5117v 229v 4.73v G
An outstanding ball player who makes a ton of plays. Plays well in traffic keeping excellent leverage on the ball. Surprising ability to slip blocks and make plays. Excellent playing instincts and the ability to locate the ball on the inside. Very good wrap up tackler. As productive a player as there is in the game. His only true negative I could find was his lack of size. Great special teams potential. Has late 2nd to mid 3 potential.
2 Crable Shawn  Michigan U LB 6051v 241v 4.62v I
Has the speed to run people down from the backside. Long strider who gains ground quickly as an outside rusher.  Good looking arms, shoulders and chest, but lacks lower body girth and strength to play with his hand on the ground on 1st down.. Most effective as a nickel rusher, but is not a washout as a “sam” I really liked his length and play speed (can run people down). Going to take some time, but could develop into a good one in time. Draft consideration 3 – 4.
4 Redd Vince Liberty U LB 6057v 263v 4.61v I
OVA transfer. I liked this players athletic ability, direction change and potential as a edge pass rusher in a 3-4 scheme. Good stride length to top of the rush and bend and use of hands to alter course and finish. Active within the running game showing both range and instincts. Good wrap up tackler.  Possible end in 4-3 scheme. Competition level is a concern, but this is a talented high ceiling player.  Round 3-4.
41 Wheeler Philip  Georgia Tech LB 6017v 240v 4.74v G
A great young man (quiet and humble).  Lacks prototype size for inside play (good natural leverage) .  Plays physical, but has to be covered up or protected. Questionable to take on lead (lacks strength).  Just looked adequate in coverage. Didn’t react or make plays on the ball. In zone, I thought he was slow to react. Was somewhat disappointed in his overall play (thought I was going to see a more athletic, instinctive player.  Round 3 – 4 draft consideration.
11 Adibi Xavier Virginia Tech LB 6016v 232v 4.71v G
Can range to the boundary, but doesn’t make enough wow plays. I liked his energy and playing character. Undersized, doesn’t take on or play through the ball to the ball.  Inconsistent to key and diagnose and locate the football (problem with miss direction and play action). Can range in pass coverage, but made few plays on the ball.  In zone appeared unaware. Not enough production to consider on day one, but should get a lot of attention at the top of rd # 4
44 Humpal Mike Iowa U LB 6024v 244v 4.83v F
Is intelligent (football smart), runs well and gave outstanding effort.  Not as quick or athletic as one would want, but make a lot of plays.  Took good angles away. I just can’t say enough about hisplayiing  instincts.  Might be a little stiff in his spot drops, but worked well in the under zones (spot drops) and can run with the TE down the field. Has good teams potential. Rd 4 – 5
15 Bowen Alvin  Iowa State U LB 6011v 223v 4.88v F
A good athlete and football player who ran well in his pads. Moved to a “sam” in 07, but I see him as more of a “Will” at the pro level.  Showed good playing range and lateral movement. Flies around and makes plays.  Good ability to slip or run around blocks. Took good angles to the football. Would have to think this player would have very good potential on special teams.  Not a big man and will have to add some bulk to his frame. Strong second day consideration.
24 Buggs Marcus Vanderbilt U LB 5104v 233v 4.80e G
Short, thick “Sam” backer prospect with body strength and explosiveness. I liked the way he met pressure and got under (leverage) the lead’d pads. Reads were good and I liked his backside effort and close to the ball.  More of a pure hitter then a consistent wrap up tackler. Should be an effective player in nickel.  Looked aware, showed good feet and some cover skills. Good special teams potential. Round 4 – 5
93 Smith Bryan McNeese St LB 6027v 239v 4.77v F
A talented player who doesn’t plays strong.  Didn’t think he took on or defeated blocks especially well on the inside.  Marginal to see things develop and flow to the ball. Is adequate at best within the passing situations.  Comes hard but just doesn’t vary his moves, counter or finish. Good team’s potential. Has a lot of gifts, but still needs a great deal of development. Mid to late round draft consideration.
48 Gatewood Curtis Vanderbilt U LB 6020v 248v 4.79v F
A talented player who doesn’t plays strong.  Didn’t think he took on or defeated blocks especially well on the inside.  Marginal to see things develop and flow to the ball. Is adequate at best within the passing situations.  Comes hard but just doesn’t vary his moves, counter or finish..Good team’s potential. Has a lot of gifts, but still needs a great deal of development. 
16 Woodyard Wesley  Kentucky U LB 6003v 227v 4.51v G
Highly productive backer with outstanding straight line speed. Has good playing instincts but also appeared to be very stiff and mechanical. Tough and game ready, but is very much a tweener.  Too small for will backer and far too stiff for the back end.  Will be hard to run off, but I don’t know where he fits at the professional level. Has made a lot of plays and should develop into a good special team player. Late round consideration but more likely a priority free agent. 
59 Kegler Stanford Purdue U LB 6015v 239v 4.61v G
Has a good looking well muscled body and impressive athletic skills to factor at the LB position, but I felt he missed an inordinate amount of tackles and wasn’t a physical take on guy at the point of attack.  Has the tool, but needs to continue to put it all together. I liked the way he took on blocks and worked to the football and did show a god effort on plays away, but will need to become more consistent in his overall play. Late draft or priority FA consideration   
6 Grant Larry Ohio St LB 6011v 235v 4.67v G
A highly touted Juco transfer. Is a good athlete who can run, but overall I was disappointed in his lack of instincts and play strength.  Didn’t meet pressure tough and wasn’t an explosive player on contact (not real physical at the point of attack). Not a quick study guy. A run and hit athlete with teams potential at this stage. Saved the best for last (LSU).  Like this player from an athletic standpoint, but is not near where he will need to be. Consider rounds 6 – 7.
22 Myles Lamar Louisville U LB 5114e 220e 4.60e G
Little guy (220 max), who was tough and competitive. Out of position playing on the inside, but may not be athlete enough to line up at the will backer position. A good deal stiffer then I would have expected. Adequate to process, but I didn’t think he showed A-1 playing instincts.  Runs around and made plays, but don’t know where he fits in a pro scheme.  Late round consideration.
11 Jackson Malik  Louisville U LB 6016v 225v 4.65e G
Run around guy who really didn’t make a lot of plays in the game viewed, particularly for a “will backer”. Can run in a straight line and gave dedicated playing effort, but a majority of them were in pursuit or down the field. Not very big or physical and isn’t going to get significantly bigger. Played better as a underclassman. Late round or free agent consideration for somebody else.
54 Brown Titus Mississippi St LB 6025v 247v 4.84v F
A special situation pass rusher who played with his hand on the ground. Had moderate success, but will have to project to a “sam” backer to play at the next level. Has the speed and quickness to came hard off the edge (has a closing burst). but didn’t always finish. Good but not exceptional athlete. Not a disciplined read and react player. Showed enough toughness, range and energy to merit a chance as a developmental player. 
46 Poppinga Kelly Brigham Young U LB 6015v 237v 4.83v
The third member of the football playing family, Kelly does not have exceptional skills  in any skill area, but is a tough consistent and a solid special teams performer  Is never going to be a great one, but I like his chances of playing in a back up, teams role
49 McCollough Ronnie Bethune Cookman LB 5112v 226v 4.75e G
First and foremost a football player. Very productive guy who made virtually every play filed in the games viewed (Hampton 07). Is undersized,  Five times conference player of the week!  Excellent nose for the ball (reads and reacts quickly). Effective in a short area. Factors positively on special team player (great desire & toughness). .Short in stature and has limitations in range, coverage and COD, but will make your ball club. 7th or priority FA consideration.
Green Chad Shaw U LB 6041v 213v 4.67v J
Not in school this past season (accademic disqualification) Has outstanding athletic ability.quickness, rare foot speed and a true closing burst.   I also believe he has the frame to add significant bulk and strength.  Needs a good deal of individual skill development (pro coaching), but has everything you want to become a top performer at this critical position. An impressive workout might earn him late consideration, but is more likely a PFA

No Comments