Scouting the 2008 Safeties

April 22nd, 2008 — football, NFL, NFL Draft

Tom Marino takes on the safeties of the 2008 NFL draft.

1 1 Phillips Kenny  Miami U DS 6022v 212v 4.51v I
Athletic big man who runs well in his pads.  Comes down hill quickly and enters the fray with good control. Good angles on wide plays and hits with force. In coverage, keys the defense and made all of the back end adjustments. I liked his movement (pedal, turns and range), but just didn’t  get into the throwing lanes or make many plays on the ball.  Game appears to be all ahead of him.  Top round consideration
2 38 Smith Reggie Oklahoma U DS 6004v 199v 4.58v I
Showed smooth athletic movement, good feet & supple hips, but I didn’t see a sudden explosive movement or close to the ball. A proto-type cover two corner or safety. Tough enough, but far from a head hunter. Injured toe late and didn’t run at the Indy combine.  Good zone awareness. Not as quick or fast as I had originally expected, but I liked his size, playing instincts, and ball skills. Return ability & teams play are a added plus. Draft consideration round 2 – 3.
3 10 Demps Quintin Texas-El Paso DS 5117v 206v 4.40v I
Is a good looking athlete from a physical standpoint and made plays on the ball in flight. Reads the QB’s eyes & shoulders and moves to the football. Has excellent speed anticipation and playing range (speed to play half coverage). The major negative  that I saw with this player was his total lack of interest and production within the running game (was neither physical or very tough). Has tools, but will need to become a more willing participant. Round 3 – 4
4 7 Morgan DaJuan No Carolina St DS 6001v 203v 4.55v I
Has size & some playing savvy, but wasn’t a fast twitch athlete. Is stiff in his pedal & I would seriously question his ability to match up with a receiver in the slot. Double moves give him some serious problems (FSU). Best area’s of his game were his take on, tackling skills in the open field & his willingness to fill the lane. Coverage limitations concern me, but he can improve in this area & develop into a productive special team player & eventual starter within the league. 
5 4 Decoud Thomas  California U DS 6013v 207v 4.56v I
Merton Hanks type player and body type. Showed a lot of playing range and impressive ball skills. Will fill the ally when called upon (not a big hitter), but was more effective in coverage. Has a chance to play out on a wing in nickel. I really liked his ball playing instincts and ability to sort things out. Solid back up, with a chance to factor in time. Good special teams potential. Has solid second day draft potential.  Round 4 – 5.
6 16 Johnson Marcellous Arkansas St DS 5117v 207v 4.44v I
A four year starter at the free safety position. Has good size, range, has the speed to stay on top of receiver in half coverage. I liked his zone cover skills (showed awareness, an understanding of routes progressions, and reacted well to the thrown ball (particularly in front of him). Not a big hitter, but gets people off their feet. Not flashy, but I liked his feel for the game. 
10 47 Lynch Corey  Appalachian St DS 6003v 202v 4.56v F
Has excellent ball skills & instincts for the game. Very bright. Very physical tackler who will fill the lane. Has good playing range & anticipation.  Experienced hand that keys the secondary. Limited only by his lack of top end speed, but ran well in pads. Very adept in zone coverage. Gets into the passing lanes & makes plays on the ball. Outstanding team’s potential (has blocked numerous kicks in his career). The type of individual you want on your football club.
11 9 Zbikowski Tommy  Notre Dame DS 5112v 211v 4.53v I
Has not played to near the level expected of him in 07. Dangerous returner who hit it up inside (showed a burst). Based on my exposure doesn’t have the cover skills to match up vs an inside receiver and surprisingly wasn’t a big factor in the running game (played like he was afraid to make a mistake). Has zone awareness and football smarts, but something appeared to be missing. Would question skills if I hadn’t seen him perform as an underclassman. Rd 5-6.
7 25 Wolfe D.J. Oklahoma U DS 5111v 207v 4.65v F
Moved to defensive safety at the start of the season and appeared to get better with each passing week.  Impressed my with his tackling skills and looked more comfortable on the inside. Was alert and showed playing instincts, but I was a tad disappointed with his ball skills. Covers ground and runs well in his pads.  Feel this player could well surprise at the next level and become an eventual starter.  Like his teams potential. Middle round consideration (4 – 5).
8 16 Steltz Craig  LSU DS 6013v 213v 4.64v F
1st year starter and team leader on the backend. Has very good size and playing awareness, particularly in zone coverage. Play the deep ball in the middle of the field particularly well (height & long arms make him a difficult person to throw over). Comes up under control & was an effective in the box run stopper. Questionable long speed and the necessary skills to match up in the slot. Back up early with good teams potential. Mid round consideration. (5 – 6).
9 22 Adams Jamar  Michigan U DS 6021v 212v 4.62v F
I liked the way this athlete’s size, know-how, toughness and the way he prepared (Senior Bowl week), but just didn’t appear to have the necessary speed to get off the hash in half coverage. Fills the ally with abandon and has the body type to win the battle at the point. Sorts things out quickly in quarters and moves to the ball, but made few plays on the ball. Has limitations (not an man cover guy)
12 19 Barrett Josh  Arizona St DS 6016v 223v 4.36v E
Has size, outstanding speed and looks awful pretty in a uniform, but just didn’t make plays. Wasn’t very physical in his play or tough (won’t tackle). Have to question his willingness to compete (won’t tackle) In coverage worked out of a tall deliberate pedal showing just adequate range and ball skills. Just don’t think he sees it or reacts quickly enough. Should be a dominant player, but something appears to be missing.  
13 2 Castille Simeon Alabama U DS 6003v 195v 4.73v F
Is a good college football player, but flat out lacks the speed, acceleration and fast twitch muscle fiber to realistically play out at the corner position in the NFL.  Body type (lean narrow looking) probably make him better suited for the free safety position or a inside nickel guy. Good zone awareness but will have to play in a a cover 2 scheme.  Not a Sammy Knight type (smash mouth player), but I liked his teams potential. and good instincts. Late rd consideration 5 – 6
14 21 Mundy Ryan  West Virginia U DS 6007v 208v 4.65e F
Senior transfer from the U of Michigan at FS. Is a very mature, smart and instinctive player. Makes all the back end calls and adjustemts..Reads the run quickly, comes up under control , and makes plays (not a head hunter, but more then adequate tackler. In zone, covered ground and showed good awareness and ball skills.  Marginal man cover skills.  Impressive in bowl victory vs Oklahoma. If medically sound, has a chance to factor. Round 6 – 7.
15 30 Lyles Nate Virginia U DS 5105v 203v 4.54v G
A tough run support safety who played physical and smart. Somewhat of a tweener in the sense he lacks the size to play inside and doesn’t have the pure cover skills to play out at a corner position. Best suited to play corner in a cover two scheme and inside in nickel.  Has a big upper but thin lower body. A good athlete who showed some explosiveness and a burst.  Some medical concerns (neck). Late round draft or priority free agent consideration. 
16 23 Barber Dominique Minnesota U DS 6002v 210v 4.70v F
Tough guy with size, but wasn’t sudden in his movement, lacks long speed and did not show particularly good ball skills.  Just adequate quickness and playing range. I really liked his physical toughs and competitiveness (playing character), but is in my opinion strictly a two down box safety. Will also give a club top special teams play, but is quite frankly a liability in coverage (man or zone).  Has late second day (6th to 7th round). draft potential. 
17 23 Abdullah Husain Washington St DS 5117v 204v 4.69v F
A four year regular and playmaker who led WSU in both tackles and picks in 2007 (took 2 to the house). Brother plays with the Denver Broncos. Does a lot of things that contribute to winning football games, but does not run well. Is going to have match-up problems with people in the slot and has very questionable recovery skills. Physical tackler who will factor on special teams. Like his game, but has limitations. Late round consideration.
18 11 Keyes Dennis UCLA DS 6005v 205v 4.68v F
Good athlete with good size, feet, body control and the ability to change direction. I liked his range  and ability to makes plays on the ball.  Anticipated well and gets himself into the throwing lanes. Was UCLA’s leading tackler in 07, but wasn’t a consistent wrap up tackler in my opinion (missed far too many in the open feet). My biggest concern was his lack of long speed. Has a lot of positive attributes and should factor as a back up at free safety. Late consideration.
19 14 Horton Chris UCLA DS 6001v 212v 4.60v F
Team leader and the heart and soul of this football team. Is tough and was a physical wrap up tackler (downhill player). Top end speed, close, and ball skills were just adequate. Highly questionable cover skills (loses in transition – always trailing) particularly when covering people on the back end. Has the physical make up and the competitiveness you look for in a special teams player.  Has late round draft  potential if speed and quickness are satisfactory. Round 6 – 7.
20 5 Fields Joseph  Syracuse U DS 6002v 206v 4.60e F
A great kid with intelligence, size & solid athletic skills.  Former option QB (starter as frosh) who has made steady progress over the past 2 seasons. Inexperienced (not quick to see things develop – inconsistent play entry & angles). Vs the pass, showed range but didn’t make a lot of plays on the ball. Should develop into a serviceable player, but is not there yet. Has every intangible you look for in a player. Possible late pick, but more likely a PFA 
21 18 Gliatta Vince Youngstown St DS 6004e 210e 4.65e F
Came out of nowhere to have a solid senior season. Option QB in high school who transferred from  Penn State  after his frosh season. Is a very tough kid, who moved around very well in space, but doesn’t appear to have long speed.  Not natural or very fluid in coverage, but did show good reactions.and toughness. A physical down hill player who will face up a ball carrier (see Ohio St). Has gotten some club’s attension, but is more a free agent.
22 8 Grant Michael Arkansas U DS 5102v 186v 4.41v G
Runs well and showed a true closing burst. Track star in high school. Is short in stature and just wasn’t very instinctive and lacks the hips to play out on a wing. Steady college player, but was far from the complete package. Would have to question just how quickly he sees things develop and reacts. Has inside match up potential, but needs to become more consistent as a as a tackler. Somebody might draft based on his speed, but is more likely a free agent.
23 27 Roach David TCU DS 6003v 210v 4.56v F
Great looking player in his uniform.  Runs well in a straight line and can cover ground, but little or no playing instincts nor was he a productive player.  Vs the run, I never saw him stick his foot in the ground and fill the lane far (too many plays ended up at his feet). Vs the pass, again didn’t react quickly or show either ball skills or instincts. Somebody is going to draft late based on his physical characteristics but this is football and not the Mr. Universe competition.
24 3 Warrick Nehemiah Michigan St DS 6007v 211v 4.56v F
A tough kid, who will light you up if he can get there.  Is good looking physically, with toughs, and is a big hitter.  Fills aggressively inside, but misses more then his share of tackles. Took inconsistent angles away and at times appeared out of control. Speed limits his man cover skills and wasn’t quick to see things develop in zone.  See him as a special team’s player who could in time develop into a contributing back up. Late consideration or priority FA potential 
25 26 Griffin Marcus Texas U DS 5102v 201v 4.81v G
Not near as talented as his football playing brother.  Is smart and has played well on special teams over his career, but his playing instincts were marginal and I felt he missed far too many tackles. Runs ok in his pads, but I didn’t see a closing burst. Don’t see this player as having starting potential, but looks like he may have the overall skills to roster (back up at both safety positions and special team’s contributor). Late round or priority free agent consideration.

 

No Comments

2008 Linebackers

April 21st, 2008 — football, NFL, NFL Draft

Here is the scouting report for the class of 2008 linebackers. This report was compiled by NFL scout Tom Marino.

 

40 Connor Dan Penn St LB 6023v 231v 4.65e I
Is an experienced, aggressive, athlete with outstanding playing instincts. Loved his first step quicks, his key & diagnose and ability to get to the ball.  I liked the way he effectively stepped up and met the lead and his tackling ability. Got depth on his spot drops, settled and moved to the ball.  Good hands. The most talented Penn State LB in a quarter century. Some early off the field immaturity (pranks), but it’s absolutely not a problem. Should factor quickly. Round # 1.
52 Gooden Tavares Miami U LB 6012v 234v 4.63v G
Has a world of athletic ability and speed to burn. Has excellent playing range, change of direction and a real burst to the ball. Liked the way he met the lead in the hole.  Doesn’t linger on blocks.  Impressive in both man and zone coverage.  Reads and reacts to the ball in flight. Not a big man by today’s standards, but is what you are looking for at the position.  Top round consideration.
10 Hayes Geno Florida St LB 6007v 226v 4.67v G
Very good athlete with good playing range.  Competitive and very active on the inside. Slips blocks and flies to the ball. Looks and plays somewhat small.  Not a big takes on guy. Will backer prospect who will need to be protected.  Flies around and makes plays (solid tackler). In coverage got good depth, settled, read route, but has poor hands. Should factor early at the pro level. Excellent teams potential. Round 2 draft consideration.
41 Kehl Bryan Brigham Young U LB 6023v 238v 4.59v G
Really liked this prospect’s playing demeanor, athletic ability, range, playing instincts and most importantly his ability in pass coverage.  Also showed blitz speed and the ability alter his course to the ball. Is quick to read and react.  A leverage guy who needs to improve his point strength and explosiveness . Good ball skills and should factor quickly in nickel.  Draft consideration round 3 to 4
44 Dizon Jordon  Colorado U LB 5117v 229v 4.73v G
An outstanding ball player who makes a ton of plays. Plays well in traffic keeping excellent leverage on the ball. Surprising ability to slip blocks and make plays. Excellent playing instincts and the ability to locate the ball on the inside. Very good wrap up tackler. As productive a player as there is in the game. His only true negative I could find was his lack of size. Great special teams potential. Has late 2nd to mid 3 potential.
2 Crable Shawn  Michigan U LB 6051v 241v 4.62v I
Has the speed to run people down from the backside. Long strider who gains ground quickly as an outside rusher.  Good looking arms, shoulders and chest, but lacks lower body girth and strength to play with his hand on the ground on 1st down.. Most effective as a nickel rusher, but is not a washout as a “sam” I really liked his length and play speed (can run people down). Going to take some time, but could develop into a good one in time. Draft consideration 3 – 4.
4 Redd Vince Liberty U LB 6057v 263v 4.61v I
OVA transfer. I liked this players athletic ability, direction change and potential as a edge pass rusher in a 3-4 scheme. Good stride length to top of the rush and bend and use of hands to alter course and finish. Active within the running game showing both range and instincts. Good wrap up tackler.  Possible end in 4-3 scheme. Competition level is a concern, but this is a talented high ceiling player.  Round 3-4.
41 Wheeler Philip  Georgia Tech LB 6017v 240v 4.74v G
A great young man (quiet and humble).  Lacks prototype size for inside play (good natural leverage) .  Plays physical, but has to be covered up or protected. Questionable to take on lead (lacks strength).  Just looked adequate in coverage. Didn’t react or make plays on the ball. In zone, I thought he was slow to react. Was somewhat disappointed in his overall play (thought I was going to see a more athletic, instinctive player.  Round 3 – 4 draft consideration.
11 Adibi Xavier Virginia Tech LB 6016v 232v 4.71v G
Can range to the boundary, but doesn’t make enough wow plays. I liked his energy and playing character. Undersized, doesn’t take on or play through the ball to the ball.  Inconsistent to key and diagnose and locate the football (problem with miss direction and play action). Can range in pass coverage, but made few plays on the ball.  In zone appeared unaware. Not enough production to consider on day one, but should get a lot of attention at the top of rd # 4
44 Humpal Mike Iowa U LB 6024v 244v 4.83v F
Is intelligent (football smart), runs well and gave outstanding effort.  Not as quick or athletic as one would want, but make a lot of plays.  Took good angles away. I just can’t say enough about hisplayiing  instincts.  Might be a little stiff in his spot drops, but worked well in the under zones (spot drops) and can run with the TE down the field. Has good teams potential. Rd 4 – 5
15 Bowen Alvin  Iowa State U LB 6011v 223v 4.88v F
A good athlete and football player who ran well in his pads. Moved to a “sam” in 07, but I see him as more of a “Will” at the pro level.  Showed good playing range and lateral movement. Flies around and makes plays.  Good ability to slip or run around blocks. Took good angles to the football. Would have to think this player would have very good potential on special teams.  Not a big man and will have to add some bulk to his frame. Strong second day consideration.
24 Buggs Marcus Vanderbilt U LB 5104v 233v 4.80e G
Short, thick “Sam” backer prospect with body strength and explosiveness. I liked the way he met pressure and got under (leverage) the lead’d pads. Reads were good and I liked his backside effort and close to the ball.  More of a pure hitter then a consistent wrap up tackler. Should be an effective player in nickel.  Looked aware, showed good feet and some cover skills. Good special teams potential. Round 4 – 5
93 Smith Bryan McNeese St LB 6027v 239v 4.77v F
A talented player who doesn’t plays strong.  Didn’t think he took on or defeated blocks especially well on the inside.  Marginal to see things develop and flow to the ball. Is adequate at best within the passing situations.  Comes hard but just doesn’t vary his moves, counter or finish. Good team’s potential. Has a lot of gifts, but still needs a great deal of development. Mid to late round draft consideration.
48 Gatewood Curtis Vanderbilt U LB 6020v 248v 4.79v F
A talented player who doesn’t plays strong.  Didn’t think he took on or defeated blocks especially well on the inside.  Marginal to see things develop and flow to the ball. Is adequate at best within the passing situations.  Comes hard but just doesn’t vary his moves, counter or finish..Good team’s potential. Has a lot of gifts, but still needs a great deal of development. 
16 Woodyard Wesley  Kentucky U LB 6003v 227v 4.51v G
Highly productive backer with outstanding straight line speed. Has good playing instincts but also appeared to be very stiff and mechanical. Tough and game ready, but is very much a tweener.  Too small for will backer and far too stiff for the back end.  Will be hard to run off, but I don’t know where he fits at the professional level. Has made a lot of plays and should develop into a good special team player. Late round consideration but more likely a priority free agent. 
59 Kegler Stanford Purdue U LB 6015v 239v 4.61v G
Has a good looking well muscled body and impressive athletic skills to factor at the LB position, but I felt he missed an inordinate amount of tackles and wasn’t a physical take on guy at the point of attack.  Has the tool, but needs to continue to put it all together. I liked the way he took on blocks and worked to the football and did show a god effort on plays away, but will need to become more consistent in his overall play. Late draft or priority FA consideration   
6 Grant Larry Ohio St LB 6011v 235v 4.67v G
A highly touted Juco transfer. Is a good athlete who can run, but overall I was disappointed in his lack of instincts and play strength.  Didn’t meet pressure tough and wasn’t an explosive player on contact (not real physical at the point of attack). Not a quick study guy. A run and hit athlete with teams potential at this stage. Saved the best for last (LSU).  Like this player from an athletic standpoint, but is not near where he will need to be. Consider rounds 6 – 7.
22 Myles Lamar Louisville U LB 5114e 220e 4.60e G
Little guy (220 max), who was tough and competitive. Out of position playing on the inside, but may not be athlete enough to line up at the will backer position. A good deal stiffer then I would have expected. Adequate to process, but I didn’t think he showed A-1 playing instincts.  Runs around and made plays, but don’t know where he fits in a pro scheme.  Late round consideration.
11 Jackson Malik  Louisville U LB 6016v 225v 4.65e G
Run around guy who really didn’t make a lot of plays in the game viewed, particularly for a “will backer”. Can run in a straight line and gave dedicated playing effort, but a majority of them were in pursuit or down the field. Not very big or physical and isn’t going to get significantly bigger. Played better as a underclassman. Late round or free agent consideration for somebody else.
54 Brown Titus Mississippi St LB 6025v 247v 4.84v F
A special situation pass rusher who played with his hand on the ground. Had moderate success, but will have to project to a “sam” backer to play at the next level. Has the speed and quickness to came hard off the edge (has a closing burst). but didn’t always finish. Good but not exceptional athlete. Not a disciplined read and react player. Showed enough toughness, range and energy to merit a chance as a developmental player. 
46 Poppinga Kelly Brigham Young U LB 6015v 237v 4.83v
The third member of the football playing family, Kelly does not have exceptional skills  in any skill area, but is a tough consistent and a solid special teams performer  Is never going to be a great one, but I like his chances of playing in a back up, teams role
49 McCollough Ronnie Bethune Cookman LB 5112v 226v 4.75e G
First and foremost a football player. Very productive guy who made virtually every play filed in the games viewed (Hampton 07). Is undersized,  Five times conference player of the week!  Excellent nose for the ball (reads and reacts quickly). Effective in a short area. Factors positively on special team player (great desire & toughness). .Short in stature and has limitations in range, coverage and COD, but will make your ball club. 7th or priority FA consideration.
Green Chad Shaw U LB 6041v 213v 4.67v J
Not in school this past season (accademic disqualification) Has outstanding athletic ability.quickness, rare foot speed and a true closing burst.   I also believe he has the frame to add significant bulk and strength.  Needs a good deal of individual skill development (pro coaching), but has everything you want to become a top performer at this critical position. An impressive workout might earn him late consideration, but is more likely a PFA

No Comments

Scouting the 2008 Defensive End’s

April 14th, 2008 — football, NFL

This is an inside and in depth look at the 2008 class of DE’s. The list has been compiled by NFL scout Tom Marino, who has over 35 years of experience and is one of the most well respected scouts in the business. For all the draft enthusiasts out there this is the kind of hard hitting information that you are after. I will be bringing you the scouting reports for every position over the next week or so as we gear up for the 2008 NFL Draft. On this list you will find the player, his school, his height and weight and their 40 time.
91 Long Chris Virginia U DE 6030v 272v 4.81v
Quality individual and player. Finishes everything. Great playing character, tenacity and toughness. Good initial get off, sees things quickly, reacts, and shows excellent play range. Rare backside effort. Wasn’t as nifty as I expected (bend and trim the edge). Great bend and core strength. More of a self made player then a natural talent. Great leverage meeting and playing off blocks. The ultimate team guy. Top defensive player in the country.
91 Harvey Derrick Florida U DE 6045v 271v 4.89v
Smooth athletic player with excellent speed, get off quickness and impressive edge rush skills. Like his stride length, hand quicks, counter moves and close. Effectively worked down inside and get to the ball. Run down player who can drop his base and stack. Seldom on the ground and on the rare occasion that he was bounced up quickly and got back into the play. Didn’t see much I didn’t like or can’t be improved. The real deal. Slam dunk # 1
50 Gholston Vernon Ohio St DE 6030v 266v 4.59v
Great physical presence. Has blacksmith arms, broad shoulders and thick muscular torso, but even with 14 sack and rare speed, I don’t consider him a natural pass rusher (paper production). Not an edge rusher (not nifty and lacks hand moves). A power rusher with a motor that doesn’t always run on high. Disappointing in space. More of an inside type, but is never going to have the mass to project.. Rare numbers, but I wouldn’t draft with my 1st selection.
54 Groves Quentin Auburn U DE 6030v 259v 4.57v
Has had some off field issues which will need to be addressed. Former OB. Lean looking cut up athlete. Has a hot and cold playing motor. Undersized to factor as down linemen full time (not good match up) and needs space to operate, but has rare take off skills and the ability to close on the ball. Excellent playing range. Can retrace his steps and run down the ball carrier from the backside. Was run at some. Late 1st round consideration.
81 Campbell Calais Miami U DE 6076v 290v 5.01v
Has lots of skills, play strength, initial get off quickness, but has a tendency to lose his focus. Has good COD and can really close on the ball. Very good inside counter move as a pass rusher. Huge wing span will pose a major problem for QB’s within the league. Very nimble big man, but is not there yet. Top round draft potential.
94 Merling Philip Clemson U DE 6042v 276v 4.80e
More physical vs the run then I expected. Liked his intensity. Disruptive. Good range and versatility. Showed a tendency to play to high, but I loved his motor, quickness, toughness and the ability to finish. Good backside effort and playing range. Locates the ball on the inside. needs better point strength. Could have some nickel inside pass rush potential with maturity. Round # 1
49 Ellis Chris Virginia Tech DE 6042v 263v 4.76v
Is a three year regular. Is an athlete who runs particularly well, has quick hands, good feet and pleanty of range. I liked the way he was able to consistently leverage the point (flexibility) and sheding blocks when playing the run. Vs the pass, I liked his get off quicks, stride length, bend at the top and close. Uses hands well can can convert speed to power. Needs to continue to make strides with maturity off the field. Round # 2
54 Jackson Lawrence USC DE 6042v 271v 4.86v
Saw him as somewhat of an under achiever, but he has the skills to become a factor as a 4-3 pass rusher. Has good range, quickness. Has natural pass rush skills (quick hands, gets small at the top of the rush and the ability to close on the ball). Vs the run, will need to improve his overall body strength. Was run at with some success (got his pads up). Wouldn’t pull the switch too quickly with this player. Late 2nd mid 3rd consideration.
32 Avril Cliff Purdue U DE 6027v 251v 4.63v
A 3-4 outside backer prospect who overall was somewhat disappointing. Got stuck on blocks and wasn’t particularly effective in his movement away from the ball. More of a “Sam backer” prospect and nickel rusher. Did show some short area pop when meeting blocks and the ball carrier. Has some natural leverage. Looks to have strong contributing back up potential within the league. Round 3 to 4 consideration.
90 Robertson Darrell Georgia Tech DE 6037v 255v 4.75e
A very good athlete who played on his feet and covered a great deal of range. I liked his leverage and use of hands when meeting blocks. Good feet and balance (plays with bent knees). Got moved around by big people but didn’t stay blocked. As a pass rusher, really came hard on the outside (gains ground). Does not convery speed to power at this time, but with maturity should develop. Has strong 3rd to 4th round draft potential.
92 Iwebema Kenny Iowa U DE 6040v 274v 5.00v
A talented player but something appears to be missing. Way too up and down. Showed good initial quickness and used his hands well, but seldom finished anything. Can converts speed to power, but too often just hung on blocks. Would like to have seen more consistent pad level. Has ability but needs further skill refirement and consistency. Late 3rd consideration, but is more likely a 4th round playing talent.
38 Howard Marcus Georgia U DE 6004v 239v 4.51v
Undersized rocked up DE. Highly explosive & the speed to pose a real problem for a lot of tackles in nickel. Questionable instinctive & playing background, but there is no doubt what he can do on 3rd & long (nickel rusher). Physical explosive tackler. Vs the run, got covered up & was generally ineffective. Plays fast and is very tough, but can never be an every down guy. Good teams potentiial. A Robert Mathis clone.
44 Davis Bruce UCLA DE 6025v 252v 4.83v
Undersized player who was a pass rusher first and foremost. I felt he was a very good athlete who can run and close as a outside speed rusher. Disappointing effort and competes within the running game. I didn’t think his motor always ran on high when chasing backside . Proved tio be ineffective in a two point stance. A one dimentional player who should warrent mid round draft consideration (4 – 5).
98 Thompson Jeremy Wake Forest U DE 6043v 264v 4.77v
A three year starter predominately on the right side. Has the quickness you look for when engaging blocker defending the run, but I also thought he got his pads up, thus negating his power. Didn’t always finish or chase backside. Has potential as a pass rusher (good hand use, stride length and closing speed, but unless he beat people off the go, lacks the necessary body strength to defeat big people at this time. Round 5 – 6 consideration.
89 Scott Trevor Buffalo U DE 6052v 252v 4.62v
Converted TE who has been banged up, but has measurable and athletic potential. I liked his motor & playing character (great energy). Not a lot of know-how at this stage or strength, but has some natural pass rush moves coming off the edge. Needs to shed blocks more effectively and finish. Also appeared to wear down working against big people (stamina)? Has tools and could develop in time. Draft consideration round 5 – 6.
92 Harrington Chris Texas A&M DE 6043v 264v 4.86v
A little bit of a tweener. Is a good worker who played with a good deal of energy. As an outside pass rusher came off the ball (good stride length), but lacked the bend at the top of the rush (far more effective as a junior). Vs the run, was not a stout physical player. Was marginal to get off block and make plays. Has some athletic ability and quickness, but is more of a back up player at the next level. Round 5 – 6 draft potential.
98 Langford Kendall Hampton U DE 6054v 287v 5.01v
Showed initial quickness on his get off, but does not play with a lot of power and or strength. Sharted each game viewed with a lot of energy, but had a tendency to run out of gas (stamina and conditioning)? Has particularly small hands, no hips or butt. Just feel if he can’t beat you off the go, will have a difficult time. Should be given strong late round draft (6 – 7) consideration.
52 Hayes William Winston Salem St DE 6026v 272v 4.71v
Impressive small college linemen who showed explosiveness on his take off, the ability to convert speed to power and close on the football. Has a pro body and very good athletic ability. Mike backer in his first two season of play. Needs to keep his pads down more consistently, but did meet blocks and play with leverage. Has good first step quickness as a pas rusher, but will need to improve in his ability to counter. Strong late round draft or priority FA potential.
33 Taylor Hilee No Carolina U DE 6023v 244v 4.59v
Is an undersized nickel rusher with rare speed who was generally an ineffective run stopper; plays high, was inconsistent with his hands and did not get off blocks particularly well. Can range and will make some plays with his backside chase. Vs the pass, is a fast twitch guy with a great 1st step, forces separation, get to the top of his rush, leans and accelerates to the ball. Too stiff to consider at LB. One dimentional, but give you something pretty special
45 Hall Alex St Augustine DE 6051v 239v 4.72v
Has a great deal of natural gifts, but is physically underdeveloped and from a position skill perspective is at least two years behind in terms of development. As a pass rusher, has long arms, good first step quickness, the stride length to get to the top of the rush and the closing speed to pressure the QB. Currrently lacks the body strength, plan of attack and practical experience to factor. Raiders type pick.
83 Jones Jason Eastern Michigan U DE 6052v 273v 4.80v
Is a former tight end who was moved to a defensive tackle position at the midpoint of the 04 season. Looks like a basketball player. Needs to play outside. Is a very raw player who had a tendency to get his pads up off the go. Limited use of hands to shed (gets stuck on blocks). Has skills and was not out of place at the Senior Bowl workouts, but is no better then a developmental player at this time. Late selection but more likely a PFA.
1 Johnson Curtis Clark-Atlanta DE 6025v 242v 4.78v
Quick side end with good speed and playing range. Needs a great deal of work with his technique (use of hands). Effective edge rusher who can trim the edge effectively. I really liked his competes and the way finished. Perfect fit as an OLB in a 3-4 scheme. Needs refinement, but has tools and intensity to play. aLooks like a contributing back up within the league who should be able to add bulk and strength to his frame. Round 6 -7 consideration.
51 Baldwin Ervin Michigan St DE 6012v 270v
Undersized (length) outside rusher, who played very hard. I thought he showed good leverage when meeting blocks, although will need to get off them more effeciently. Come hard as an outside rusher, but lacks hand use, counter skills, and finishing skills. A special situation rusher who has shown enough to merit late round consideration (6th to 7th).
9 Geathers Jeremy UNLV DE 6021v 259v 4.82v
Undersized Juco transfer (son of long time NFL tackle James). Was far better player then I originally expected. Has excellent hip strength and lower body power.Good leverage and hands defending the run. Didn’t make a lot of plays on wide plays, but was strong and effective. As a pass rusher, showed good lean and dip at the top of rush (has an inside counter), but just modest results (only 11 sacks in 2 years). A work in progress, but has some tools. Round 7
92 Dingle Johnny West Virginia U DE 6013v 265v 4.98v
Originally signed with Florida but was a non-qualifier and transferred. Is a undersized player with athletic ability who flashed skills as an edge rusher. Comes hard. Gets upfield, trims the edge, and showed a closing burst. Was just inconsistent in this area, and was in my opinion a non entity defending the run. Motor doesn’t always run on high. Just when you are about to give up on him will make a “wow” play to get you excited. 7th or priority free agent.
82 Craig Angelo Cincinnati U DE 6040v 252v 5.09v
First year regular. Former WR, TE and LB before finding a home at DE. Is a good athlete, with foot speed and a burst. Can trim the edge and has the physical make up (long arms) to alter the throwing lanes (flashed impressive hand use). Up and down playing intensity. Have to question both his mental and physical toughness. Late consideration with the hope of developing at the LB position.
93 Ortiz Chase TCU DE 6020v 249v 4.93v
Outside backer in a 3-4 look. Plays with a good motor and had some adequate backside chase and outside pass rush potential. A straight line guy who doesn’t have the hips and COD to project to linebacker. Too small to line up at as a 4-3 end. Gets muscled on the inside by big people. Looks like a steady back up prospect with second day (5th to 7th) round draft potential.
1 Holmes Louis Arizona U DE 6035v 263v 4.89v
Highest rated Has size and a great deal of natural talent, but has made some highly questionable off the field decisions which can’t be overlooked. Said to be very immature and inconsistent as a player. Not a high motor guy but when he wants to has more then enough playing skills to impact a game. A club could well hit big with this player, but I really don’t know he can be counted on over the long haul. Has 7th round or free agent potential.
93 Smith Dorian Oregon St DE 6014v 264v 5.08v
An under rated player who makes plays on the strength of a motor that always runs on high. Does not have a natural feel for the position, nor does he have special tools, but made plays due to his sustained effort Is never going to have the size and strength for full time participation. Would consider in a late round ate round 5-7 draft consideration.
93 Hout Kurt Ferris St DE 6010v 266v 4.91v
A tough undersized small college player who played extremely hard. Flies around and makes plays. Not particularly strong, but was physical and has an edge to him. Has had some off the field issues but has matured over the past two years (raised himself). Didn’t think he located the ball on the inside as well as he should have (lack of height likely contributed to his lack of success). Outside chance to factor at the professional level
55 Artis Wallace Furman U DE 6033v 266v 5.00e
97 Fountain Marque Oklahoma St DE
47 Franklin Vegas Miami U DE 6022v 239v 4.91v
97 Blake Tommy TCU DE 6025v 272v 4.83v
92 Gilberry Wallace Alabama U DE 6022v 268v 4.99v
90 Studebaker Andrew Wheaton College DE 6030v 249v 4.54v
95 Jackson Robert Kansas St DE 6032v 256v 4.91v
58 Mullenix Matt Washington St DE 6054e 255e 4.80e
49 Pittman Kirston LSU DE 6023v 254v 4.74v
97 Schlekeway Nick Boise St DE 6033v 268v 4.93v
90 Udofla Udeme Stanford U DE 6035v 244v 5.03v
49 Van Orsow Jeff Oregon St DE
89 Reynolds Antonio Tennessee U DE 6035v 266v 4.92v
7 Gunheim Greyson Washington U DE 6050e 260e 4.90e
93 Burnett Martail Utah U DE 6026v 257v 4.79v
93 Mitchell Xavier Tennessee U DE 6026v 258v 4.88v
58 Clermond Joe Pittsburgh U DE 6022v 253v 4.97v
91 Henderson Robert Southern Mississippi DE 6027v 281v 4.87v
57 Gray Derrick Texas Southern DE 6041v 269v 5.00e
45 Bright Eugene Purdue U DE
54 Dotson Alonzo Oklahoma U DE 6030e 250e
99 Mattison Bryan Iowa U DE 6027v 290v 5.09v
96 Flynn Dallas Northwest Missouri St DE 6045v 260v
2 Johnson Roderick Oklahoma St DE 6024e 255e 4.95e
42 Oliver Adamm Georgia Tech DE 6036v 271v 4.80e
94 Osborn Nick San Diego St DE 6033v 251v 4.80e
98 Boston Alex Florida St DE 6023v 261v 4.76v
41 Brown Martel No Carolina St DE 6010e 255e 4.90e
88 Cox Brandon Louisville U DE
99 Hardie Rudolph Howard U DE 6017v 257v 4.90e
57 Larkin Nick Boston College DE 6036v 244v
58 Mester Craig Miami (Ohio) U DE 6040e 245e
59 Nading Jesse Colorado St DE 6047v 261v
12 Noa Karl Hawaii U DE 6035v 239v
93 Owens Jacob Fairmont St DE 6047v 266v 4.91v
94 Saint-Dic Jonal Michigan St DE 6002v 253v 4.90e
11 Amos John Calif-Davis DE 6031v 254v
90 Baker Maurice CW Post DE 6034e 260e
92 Bakhtiari Eric U of San Diego DE
56 Cummings Kenwin Wingate U DE 6017v 258v 5.08v
31 Griffin Kerby California (PA) DE 6005v 266v 5.14v
90 Chapman Jeremiah No Texas U DE
40 Boynton Blair Northern Arizona U DE
41 McKillop Chris Pittsburgh U DE 6024v 252v
94 Joseph Kirby McNeese St DE 6014e 270e 4.94v

Comments Off