Gus Ornstein's School of Sports » NFL

Mike Martz Offensive Guru

Gus — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:59:23 +0000

By Gus Ornstein

We recently had the opportunity to visit with San Francisco TE Vernon Davis. One of the topics we discussed with Vernon is the addition of new offensive coordinator Mike Martz and the impact that would have on his season. Mike Martz has been known as an offensive guru and as a mad scientist, but whatever you want to call him the bottom line is the guy flat out knows offensive football; give him a weapon with the size, speed, strength and athletic ability of a Vernon Davis and there is no telling what the 49ers offense will look like in 2008! Vernon is excited to have Martz at the controls because that means Davis will be used in a million different roles which will result in more production for the third year TE out of Maryland. Martz’s system is very complex and intricate and can be difficult to grasp, but Vernon assured us that it is actually easy to learn and that he already feels very comfortable with his new offensive coordinator.

I was shocked that Vernon said the offense is actually easy, because I have seen that system first hand. I had the opportunity to play for Mike Martz in 1999 when he was the offensive coordinator for the St. Louis Rams and I was a rookie quarterback. I came to St. Louis as an undrafted free agent and joined other quarterbacks Joe Germaine, a 4^th round draft choice out of Ohio State, and veterans Trent Green and the unknown Kurt Warner (which of course would soon change!) From day one of mini camp I was completely lost with Martz because in our offensive meetings he would start to draw up a play on the board to explain and then would erase it before I even had the chance to get the cap off my pen. The challenge for Joe and me was that we were rookies in a room with two veteran QB’s who had a strong grasp of the system and Martz did not feel the need to go into great detail for us first year guys. Trent Green had played in this type of system for basically his entire career first in San Diego and then in Washington with the Redskins, and Kurt had already been with Martz for the entire off season, so he had a huge jump on us. Not only did Martz refuse to explain the offense to Joe and me but I think he got some sort of pleasure out of torturing us rookies with the fact that we were completely lost. Joe and I decided to approach John Ramsdell our QB coach to see if he would meet with us first thing in the morning before the Mike Martz meetings so that we could go over the system with him. Fortunately for us, Ramsdell agreed to meet us at 6AM each morning and we finally began to gain an understanding into the complex mind of the great Mike Martz.

For those out there that have never had the pleasure of playing for Mike Martz I want to include some actual play calls from the 1999 Super Bowl Champion St. Louis Rams. Now take a look at these plays and then try saying them in a huddle with 10 other guys looking at you and counting on you to lead them. When Martz would give us the play in practice before we stepped into the huddle he would say it so fast that often I had to ask him to repeat it. Instead of repeating it he would tell me that I had no clue what I was doing and would insert another QB!!

MIKE MARTZ PLAY CALLS:

TWINS RIGHT MOTION SCAT RIGHT 525 F POST SWING

FLANK RIGHT MOTION SCAT RIGHT 095 F POST SWING

QUEEN RIGHT FAKE PRESS RIGHT NAKED LEFT 924 F FLAT

FLANK RIGHT SCAT RIGHT 370 F SHOOT/ PUMP/ SWING

FLEX RIGHT BRONCO LEFT 686 PUMP BACKS CROSS

JACK RIGHT SLOT JAM FAKE TOSS LEFT NAKED RIGHT 124

I know that Vernon is working hard to get all this down and we wish him the best of luck in 2008!

Click here the to hear the entire interview with Vernon Davis:

NFL Draft Revise

Gus — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:48:46 +0000

All of you out there that believe the football season starts in April with the NFL draft need to take a look at the following article. This is an article that will appeal to the type of fan that can’t start his day without a word from Mel Kiper and Todd McShay. Tom Marino, a former NFL scout, has decided that the draft needs a makeover and in the following article explains his point of view.

As we all know, the current draft system in football — and for that matter, all of the other major sports leagues — reward failure both on and off the field. When a club does not perform on the field, they are rewarded by giving them a better draft position. If your GM or scouting department makes a critical draft mistake, don’t worry gang, we’ll just give you another early pick next year. Unable to re-sign a veteran player? How about some compensatory picks for all of your troubles? My answer; do your job and do it right the first time!!!

For the entire article visit:

SportsGist.com

NFL DRAFT TEAM GRADES

Gus — Fri, 02 May 2008 16:41:50 +0000

The draft has now come and go and we won’t truly know who won and who lost until after this season is over and we have a chance to see all of these rookies in action for the first time. With all of that said everyone still wants to see how their favorite team fared and here is former NFL scout Tom Marino to hand out the grades to every team for their performance at this years draft.

experts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3347206">Leodis McKelvin, CB, Troy
Hardy, WR, Indiana
Ellis, DE, Virginia Tech
Corner, CB, Akron
Fine, TE, Kansas
Bowen, OLB, Iowa State
Omon, RB, Buffalo
Bell, OT, Northwestern State
Johnson, WR, Kentucky
Cox, CB, PittsburghThe Bills filled a critical need in Round One and may have solved the No. 2 receiving position with the selection of Hardy — but I have my doubts. Ellis has pass rush skills and should contribute quickly on third down. The undersized Corner was a reach at four as was the one-dimensional TE Fine, who is strictly a pass catcher. Omon put up some impressive numbers, and although he lacks top speed he should make it in a backup role. Bell is a former basketball player and Johnson is a size/speed athlete who could develop. Bowen should factor on special teams while developing into a contributing “Sam” or “Will” backer. There are not enough players with starting or long-range playing potential in this group.
Panthers: A experts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3065230">Jonathan Stewart, RB, Oregon
Otah, OT, Pittsburgh
ut.com/a.z?s=8&p=8&c=1&nid=3067699">Charles Godfrey, CB, Iowa
ut.com/a.z?s=8&p=8&c=1&nid=3060925">Dan Connor, LB, Penn State
out.com/a.z?s=8&p=8&c=1&nid=3054037">Gary Barnidge, TE, Louisville
out.com/a.z?s=8&p=8&c=1&nid=3263318">Nick Hayden, DT, Wisconsin
out.com/a.z?s=8&p=8&c=1&nid=3267247">Hilee Taylor, OLB, North Carolina
.z?s=8&p=8&c=1&nid=3065270">Geoff Schwartz, OT, Oregon
.z?s=8&p=8&c=1&nid=3705925">Mackenzy Bernadeau, OG, BentleyThe Panthers addressed some offensive concerns with the first two selections and got excellent value. Although he possesses excellent straight speed and size, I was disappointed in Godfrey’s man-cover skills. I’m a big fan of Dan Connor and it wouldn’t surprise me to see him in the starting lineup by the midpoint of his rookie season. Barnidge was a very underrated TE who is an excellent receiver. From the late rounds, Hayden is a steady inside player and run stopper, Taylor a nifty nickel-rusher and Schwartz is a massive, wide body. All are solid picks, but in my opinion none will contribute significantly in 2008. The Panthers’ seventh selection, Mackenzy Bernadeau from Bentley College, was injured and missed the second half of the ’07 season. But I really like his game and playing potential. A solid well planned draft overall. C+ experts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3066764">Chris Williams, OT, Vanderbilt
Forte, RB, Tulane
Bennett, WR, Vanderbilt
Harrison, DT, Arkansas
Steltz, S, LSU
Bowman, CB, Nebraska
Davis, TE, Michigan State
Baldwin, DE, Michigan State
Adams, OG, Georgia
LaRocque, OLB, Oregon State
Barton, OT, Ohio State
Monk, WR, ArkansasWilliams is a highly intelligent, natural athlete with excellent feet who should become a fixture on the left side for at least the next decade. Forte is not flashy, but runs extremely hard and consistently moves the chains. Bennett is a dependable inside receiving prospect, but I don’t see him as any better than a third in the pro game. Harrison is an excellent run-stopping tackle, but was on the board at 90, due in part to off-the-field concerns. Steltz is big and smart, but lacks speed you want on the back end. The first of the fifth-round picks, Bowman, has size and speed but has not returned 100 percent from a serious knee injury sustained in ’06. Davis has a great body and athletic ability, but has never done it over the long haul. Barton, Baldwin, and Monk — who was injured for much of ’07 — are all solid seventh round selections who could factor in time.
Bengals: D+ xperts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3290183">Keith Rivers, LB, USC
Simpson, WR, Coastal Carolina
Sims, DT, Auburn
Caldwell, WR, Florida
Collins, OT, Kansas
Shirley, DT, Fresno State
Lynch, S, Appalachian State
Sherry, TE, Villanova
Craig, OLB, Cincinnati
Urrutia, WR, LouisvilleThe Bengals selected one of the very best players in the country in Keith Rivers and followed it with three gutsy selection in Jerome Simpson, Andre Caldwell and Corey Lynch. But in between they selected four people that left me shaking my head. Patrick Sims was very inconsistent, was very sloppy looking physically and has stability issues that resulted in being taken off a number of team boards. Jason Shirley was dismissed from the squad during the ’07 season. Mario Urrutia was charged with assault and Anthony Collins was off a number of team boards evidently due to a shaky personal interview. Mike Brown is easily the most intellectually gifted person doing business in the league and the Tobins (Bill and Duke) are excellent talent evaluators. But after the myriad of problems they have had over the last decade, what possibly could they be thinking with these highly questionable selections?
D- lexperts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3325310">Beau Bell, LB, UNLV
Rucker, TE, Missouri
Rubin, DT, Iowa State
Hubbard, WR, Wisconsin
Bowl week, represented excellent value in round number four if he is medically sound. Rucker is a one-dimensional player (pass catcher only) who was totally unsatisfactory at the point of attack. Rubin is a former JUCO offensive tackle who has made great progress in just his second season on defense. But he is going to have to improve his playing a great deal before he will see the playing field. Hubbard looks very pretty in a uniform, but has not come close to realizing his full playing potential as a college athlete partially due to injuries. Hall is an athlete (excellent spring workout), but is undersized (needs to add 25 lbs) and will require at the very least a couple of redshirt seasons before he is ready to hit the field. A experts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3295620">Felix Jones, RB, Arkansas
=1&nid=3048959">Mike Jenkins, CB, South Florida
=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3557778">Martellus Bennett, TE, Texas A&M
s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3074318">Tashard Choice, RB, Georgia Tech
s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3043293">Orlando Scandrick, CB, Boise State
interested and skilled in the personnel area than Jerry Jones. His selection of Felix Jones with their first selection was not based on sentiment or loyalty to the university that he once attended, but rather was the result of a well thought out football decision. In terms of talent, Mike Jenkins — not McKelvin, Rodgers-Cromartie, Cason or Talib — is the top corner prospect in the country. Teams were not concerned with his play on Saturday, but rather his work during the practice week. Bennett is a work in progress, but has top athletic skills. Choice should develop into a steady backup player while Scandrick was an excellent selection in the fifth round (can’t coach speed). Dallas is the team to beat in the NFC for 2008.
C+ experts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3043351">Ryan Clady, OT, Boise State
=1&nid=3200113">Eddie Royal, WR, Virginia Tech
s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3347208">Kory Lichtensteiger, C, Bowling Green
s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3525461">Jack Williams, CB, Kent
s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3069180">Ryan Torain, RB, Arizona State
s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3526598">Carlton Powell, DT, Virginia Tech
s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3070458">Spencer Larsen, ILB, Arizona
s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3069172">Josh Barrett, S, Arizona State
s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3295605">Peyton Hillis, FB, ArkansasClady needs to improve his overall playing strength, but should assimilate himself quickly into the Broncos’ zone-blocking system. Royal is a little man who was more effective lining up in the slot. Lichtensteiger is plain and simple a football player. Williams is an undersized corner who should quickly contribute as a sub-package defender and returner. Ryan Torain runs hard, showed balance, breaks tackles and secures the football, but doesn’t have top speed and has not proven to be durable. Powell is not a very physical player, but has athletic skills and potential. Josh Barrett is a pretty looking athlete with great speed, but flat-out won’t hit a soul. Don’t be surprised if Peyton Hillis gets his wish and lines up at the running back or one-back set.
B+ experts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3176809">Gosder Cherilus, OT, Boston College
Dizon, LB, Colorado
Smith, RB, Central Florida
Fluellen, DT, Florida State
Avril, OLB, Purdue
Moore, WR, Wake Forest
Felton, FB, Furman
Cohen, DT, Ohio
Campbell, S, Army I don’t think Gosder Cherilus was the Lions’ original choice at 17, but when the run began on offensive linemen the Lions were left with few other options. Dizon is undersized, but all he does is make plays all over the field. Smith is a first-round talent, but off-the-field concerns dropped him to the third round. Fluellen, like Dizon, is undersized and missed some time in ’07 due to injury, but is a combative and disruptive inside player. Kenneth Moore is a very talented, dependable inside-receiving prospect who is a great fit for their offensive system. Although not a polished lead blocker, Jerome Felton is a very effective red zone runner (67 career TDs) and caught the ball extremely well. Caleb Campbell is a great young man, was smart, instinctive, and could surprise as a nickel backer.
Packers: C- experts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3347356">Jordy Nelson, WR, Kansas State
Brohm, QB, Louisville
Lee, CB, Auburn
Finley, TE, Texas
Thompson, DE, Wake Forest
Sitton, OT, Central Florida
Giacomini, OT, Louisville
s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3014704">Matt Flynn, QB, LSU
c=1&nid=2705423">Brett Swain, WR, San Diego State Jordy Nelson is game-ready and should become a favorite of new starter Aaron Rodgers and the fans of the Packers. I’ve never been a big fan of Brian Brohm, or for that matter the numerous sure thing QBs who preceded him at Louisville (Redman, LeFors, Ragone, Nagel). But I believe Green Bay and Mike McCarthy’s offensive scheme might be the best fit for him in the league. Patrick Lee is a one-year wonder and TE Jermichael Finley is also a novice in terms of playing experience. Giacomini needs more physical strength, but I like his feet and overall athletic ability. In my opinion, Flynn has far too many things to fix in terms of mechanics. Brett Swain has good skills but questionable speed. Not enough immediate help and failure to address the RB position is a concern. F lexperts.scout.com/a.z?s=109&p=8&c=1&nid=3325673">Duane Brown, OT, Virginia Tech
Molden, CB, Eastern Kentucky
Slaton, RB, West Virginia
Adibi, OLB, Virginia Tech
Okam, DT, Texas
Barber, S, Minnesota
Brink, QB, Washington State This is what you get when coaches run your draft instead of scouts! An entire year spent preparing and this is the best they can do? Duane Brown is a former TE who played on the left side for the first time in ’07. I just thought he was soft, didn’t finish nor did he show much in the way of toughness. One AFC club had him slotted in the fifth- to seventh-round range. In round number two the Texans chose a player who, aside from impressive Combine numbers, did little to impress in terms of position skills. Slaton has speed, but doesn’t have the strength or size for full-time consideration. Adibi doesn’t make plays and lacks playing instincts. Okam has the physical numbers you look for, but I wonder just how important football is to this individual. Barber is a tough run-support safety who lacks top speed. And their final selection, Brink, is a solid backup type prospect. The draft is the life blood to a football team, and after viewing these selections I believe a major transfusion might be necessary.
Colts: C experts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3084694">Mike Pollak, C, Arizona St.
Wheeler, OLB, Georgia Tech
Tamme, TE, Kentucky
Howard, OLB, Georgia
Santi, TE, Virginia
Justice, C, Wake Forest
Hart, RB, Michigan
Garcon, WR/KR, Mount Union
Richard, OC, BuffaloPollak is a smart, versatile, steady player, but far from a butt-kicker. Wheeler is a physical player with real instincts, but needs to be protected on the inside in order to be effective. I also felt he was slow to react in pass coverage. Tamme is a smart player with good playing intangibles, but is not going to offer much help at the point of attack. Howard is a Robert Mathis clone and should contribute quickly as a nickel rusher Justice is a good football player, but lacks play strength. And Mike Hart just doesn’t have the speed to become a feature back in the NFL. Pierre Garcon is not your typical D-III prospect and Richard is strong, tough and very physical. Jaguars: D+ xperts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3324662">Derrick Harvey, DE, Florida
Groves, DE, Florida
Williams, OLB, USC
Williams, CB, South Florida
Washington, RB, USCHarvey has a chance to become something very special. Second-round selection Quentin Groves is actually equally or more impressive from an athletic standpoint, but was far too inconsistent in his overall play. On day number two, the Jaguars drafted three individuals who will have a difficult time factoring with this football club. Thomas Williams has good play smarts, but is a limited-area player and was a non-factor in coverage. Trae Williams is a smart, productive, experienced player but doesn’t have the kind of speed you look for at the position. Chancey Washington has had both academic and injury problems during his career. And although I felt he did a lot of things well, he really doesn’t have any area that I would consider exceptional in any way.
Chiefs: A+ xperts.scout.com/a.z?s=109&p=8&c=1&nid=3014749">Glenn Dorsey, DT, LSU
=1&nid=3542598">Branden Albert, OG, Virginia
=1&nid=3375142">Brandon Flowers, CB, Virginia Tech
=1&nid=3019017">Jamaal Charles, RB, Texas
=1&nid=2640844">Brad Cottam, TE, Tennessee
=1&nid=3306033">DaJuan Morgan, S, North Carolina State
c=1&nid=3159614">William Franklin, WR, Missouri
c=1&nid=3154794">Barry Richardson, OT, Clemson
c=1&nid=3587269">Kevin Robinson, WR, Utah State
c=1&nid=3557491">Brian Johnston, DE, Gardner Webb
c=1&nid=3620204">Mike Merritt, TE, Central Florida In what may have been his swan song with the organization, Carl Peterson, with the help of Bill Kuharich and head coach Herman Edwards, may well have orchestrated the greatest draft in the team’s history! Both first selections will become starters right about the time they arrive at baggage claim in Kansas City. Brandon Flowers (an excellent sub-package prospect) is a skilled corner, but his lack of size and speed are major concerns. Jamaal Charles has excellent run skills, but is going to have to improve both as a pass receiver and on pass protection. Cottam is a skilled receiving TE, but will need stay healthy .And he might be too tall to leverage inline. DaJaun Morgan is a top in-the-box safety and potential vertical threat Will Franklin has far more ability then he has shown to this point. Late-round selections were all interesting and well-planned choices.
B+ xperts.scout.com/a.z?s=109&p=8&c=1&nid=3248192">Jake Long, OT, Michigan
Merling, DE, Clemson
Henne, QB, Michigan
Langford, DE, Hampton
Murphy, OG, Utah State
Parmele, RB, Toledo
Thomas, OG, Connecticut
Hilliard, RB, Montana
Dotson, DT, ArizonaThe Dolphins have many holes to fill on both sides of the ball, but they took a major step in doing so with a solid draft. All successful Parcells-built clubs have had a signature solid offensive front. And by drafting Jake Long, Shawn Murphy and Donald Thomas, he once again showed his commitment to that goal. Both Parmele and Hilliard are tough north-south runners who move the chains. Merling has good playing potential, but needs to improve his overall play strength. Look for him to eventually play down inside in sub-packages. Henne should develop into a steady starter within the league, but is not nearly ready to challenge for a starting position within the league. Dotson is a wide body who played hard, but lacks a degree of quickness, range, and stamina. Vikings: F experts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3324694">Tyrell Johnson, S, Arkansas St.
David Booty, QB, USC
Guion, DT, Florida State
Sullivan, C, Notre Dame
Johnson, WR, Jackson StateFirst selection Tyrell Johnson has a great feel for the game and was one of the most impressive players I saw during the 2007 season. Booty looks like a backup player within the league who, when called upon, can get you through a game and contribute in a backup role. Letroy Guion has potential, but after three years at Florida State had zero sacks in his career. Jaymar Johnson is undersized (his small-boned frame really concerns me) and doesn’t appear to have top vertical speed (quicker then fast). The In my opinion, the Vikings selected only one player with a real chance of competing for significant playing time. Patriots: C- experts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3156294">Jerod Mayo, LB, Tennessee
Wheatley, CB, Colorado
Crable, OLB, Michigan
O’Connell, QB, San Diego State
Wilhite, CB, Auburn
Slater, WR, UCLA
Ruud, OLB, NebraskaJarod Mayo is going to have to get stronger when meeting pressure, but I believe he will become one of the top three players from this year’s draft. Wheatley will pass 2007 top selection Meriweather quickly in the Patriots system. Crable could prove to be an effective nickel rusher and is far from a dead card as a “Sam.” Kevin O’Connell is an excellent developmental QB prospect, but I think he needs to work on what I feel was an awkward throwing delivery. The latter part of the draft was a total farce. Slater is an undersized receiver who returned three kickoffs for touchdowns in ’07, but in five seasons at UCLA had zero pass receptions. Ruud has a pro body and blood lines, but I question his love for the game and his heart.
Saints: D- xperts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3286694">Sedrick Ellis, DT, USC
Porter, CB, Indiana
Pressley, DT, North Carolina State
Nicks, OT, Nebraska
Mehlhaff, K, Wisconsin
Arrington, WR, MichiganSedrick Ellis is a disruptive force on the nose, but in no way shape or form is the second coming of Tommy Harris. In my opinion, he was far better at nose than at a 3-technique. Tracy Porter is an athletic cover corner, but is both undersized and non-combative versus the run. DeMario Pressley was injured for much of the ’07 season and did not distinguish himself at Senior Bowl workouts. Carl Nicks has real talent and is the best run-blocker in this year’s draft. But there were many reasons why he was still available at the 164th pick in the draft. Mehlhaff could win the kicking job by default, while Arrington has the size to match up favorably, but lacks the speed to threaten vertically.
C+ experts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3036356">Kenny Phillips, S, Miami
Thomas, CB, USC
Manningham, WR, Michigan
Kehl, OLB, BYU
Goff, OLB, Vanderbilt
Woodson, QB, Kentucky
Henderson, DE, Southern MississippiSitting at No. 31 overall, the defending Super Bowl Champion Giants appear to have upgraded themselves in the secondary with the selection of Kenny Phillips and Terrell Thomas. Phillips is a downhill player, but was also effective defending the pass. Thomas lacks racehorse speed and didn’t appear to make plays on the football down the field. But he is experienced, instinctive and is a good athlete. Manningham was worth the gamble at the end of the third (multiple drug-test failures and seems to be a slow processor). Kehl is a good football player who can run and shows good instincts and intelligence. Goff is a heady, experienced performer, but is going to have to improve his skills to play to a championship level. In the sixth, Woodson was a good pick, but there are a lot of things to fix with his game. But I have one final question. Just how many QBs are they going to bring to camp?
F xperts.scout.com/a.z?s=109&p=8&c=1&nid=3244585">Vernon Gholston, DE, Ohio State
Keller, TE, Purdue
Lowery, CB, San Jose State
Ainge, QB, Tennessee
Henry, WR, Kansas
Garner, OT, ArkansasWell, I’m not going to sugarcoat this one. Vernon Gholston is a coach killer who lacks tenacity and the playing character necessary to become a productive player in the NFL. Always remember that leopards don’t change their spots. I really liked Dustin Keller’s receiving skills and athletic ability, but management’s claim that he is going to develop into a complete tight end is completely without merit. I like Dwight Lowery’s feet, hands, and physical stature. But like sixth-round selection Marcus Henry, he just doesn’t have the speed to become a frontline corner in the NFL. Ainge is an experienced hand with intelligence and size, but I question his throwing accuracy and arm strength (too many throws into the sidelines appeared to lose interest). Garner is a massive wide-body guy who came on during his first season as a starter.
B+ xperts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3295116">Darren McFadden, RB, Arkansas
Branch, CB, Connecticut
Shields, WR, Richmond
Scott, DE, Buffalo
Schilens, WR, San Diego State The Raiders only had five selections in this year’s draft, but the common denominator in each of these selections was speed, speed, and more speed. Did I mention the fact that the Raiders also drafted the very best player in the country in Darren McFadden? The first of their two fourth-round selections, Tyvon Branch, is tight in the hips and doesn’t have good ball skills. But he’s big, strong, tough, physical, and very fast. And he is also a dangerous kick returner. The second fourth, Arman Shields, was injured in game three (14 catches), and missed the remainder of the season. If he had stayed healthy, this impressive athlete likely would have been selected in the top two rounds. Despite also being injured for part of the season, Chez Schilens then put up the best workout numbers in the country during the spring. Trevor Scott is a converted TE who needs better strength, but I loved his energy, playing tools and toughness.
Eagles: D- experts.scout.com/a.z?s=109&p=8&c=1&nid=2944844">Trevor Laws, DT, Philadelphia
Jackson, WR, California
Smith, OLB, McNeese State
McGlynn, OG, Pittsburgh
Demps, S, UTEP
Ikegwuonu, CB, Wisconsin
Gibson, OG, California
Dunlap, OT, AuburnYou have to love Trevor Laws’ tenacity and playing character, but I have a feeling he is going to have problems with big people inside. He gets covered up and doesn’t play big. DeSean Jackson is talented, but remember where you heard this — little guys don’t hold up physically in the NFL. Does anyone recall the name Jacquez Green? Quintin Demps has all of the tools you look for, but the next person he hits will be the first one. Jack Ikegwuonu has real talent, but is coming off a knee injury and is facing some criminal charges for allegedly breaking into an apartment with his twin brother while attempting to steal an X-box console. Based on his play, I would have to question King Dunlap’s playing character. Studebaker is a talented D-III player, but he broke his foot and missed the remainder of the season. Mike Gibson is a versatile player with savvy, but lacks functional playing strength. I like Mike McGlynn’s chances of contributing as an inside player. Steelers: B- experts.scout.com/a.z?s=109&p=8&c=1&nid=3309192">Rashard Mendenhall, RB, Illinois
Sweed, WR, Texas
Davis, DE, UCLA
Hills, OT, Texas
Dixon, QB, Oregon
Humpal, OLB, Iowa
Mundy, S, West VirginiaRashard Mendenhall still on the board at the 23rd spot was a very pleasant surprise to both Steelers officials and fans. In Limas Sweed the Steelers feel they may have found a Plaxico Burress-type inside receiver. Bruce Davis is the prototype 3-4 outside backer that the Steelers covert. Tony Hills is a very talented athlete, but has battled injuries throughout his entire college career. I don’t like Dixon’s throwing mechanics and see little chance of him playing beyond this level. Mike Humpal is a very solid football player with outstanding playing instincts. Ryan Mundy is a local product who has both intelligence and outstanding playing instincts and will eventually run the show on the back end. Chargers: F experts.scout.com/a.z?s=109&p=8&c=1&nid=3126067">Antoine Cason, CB, Arizona
Hester, FB, LSU
Thomas, RB, UTEP
Tribble, CB, Boston College
Clark, OT, Texas A&MCason is a playmaker at the corner position, but doesn’t have top speed to play over the top or the burst to close on the underneath throws. He is a possible safety projection, but then again, I didn’t think he was a particularly good tackler. Hester is a strong inside runner with a lot of heart, but when he lined up at the fullback position he didn’t adjust effectively as a lead or iso-blocker. Marcus Thomas actually played better as a freshman and sophomore than he did as a senior. He has some inside power but lacks the speed to bounce plays to the outside. DeJaun Tribble is both small and slow — not a good combination for the cornerback position. Corey Clark is not pretty, but is a big man who was an effective short-area player when he maintained good pad level.
49ers: D- experts.scout.com/a.z?s=109&p=8&c=1&nid=3284957">Kentwan Balmer, DT, North Carolina
Rachal, OG, USC
Smith, S, Oklahoma
Wallace, C, Texas A&M
Morgan, WR, Virginia Tech
Grant, OLB, Ohio State Kentwan Balmer really came on in 2007 to put together a very solid season while establishing himself as the consensus number three DT in the country. But don’t drink the Kool-Aid just yet with this player. He has limited range and showed virtually no pass rush skills. Rachal has a lot of talent, but has missed time due to injury, thus slowing his progress and skill development. Reggie Smith is a talented player who has been projected inside not because of his rare skills, but rather because he doesn’t have the speed to play out on a wing. I liked Cody Wallace’s toughness and overall playing character, but he lacks a degree of strength and was not a supple athlete. Larry Grant is a run-around guy, but has not played to near the level of efficiency people had predicted as the top JUCO player in the country. B experts.scout.com/a.z?s=109&p=8&c=1&nid=3290170">Lawrence Jackson, DE, USC
Carlson, TE, Notre Dame
Bryant, DT, Texas A&M
Schmitt, FB, West Virginia
Schmitt, LS, San Diego State
Forsett, RB, California
Coutu, K, GeorgiaIt sure wasn’t a high-profile, glitzy draft, but Mike Holmgren and his staff got exactly what he was looking for in his final season as head coach with the Seahawks. Every player drafted is a steady, game-ready performer who will contribute to winning football games from the go. Lawrence Jackson has played a lot of football, but really came on in his senior season. John Carlson is the best blocking TE in the country who is a highly dependable underneath and check-down receiver, but isn’t a true up-the-seam threat. Joe Bryant has had some medical concerns, but when he keeps his pads down he is a very dependable lane-restricting inside player. Fans of the Seahawks are going to love Justin Schmidt, an unselfish, throwback-type performer who is really going to contribute in the running game.
A xperts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3200069">Chris Long, DE, Virginia
Avery, WR, Houston
Greco, OT, Toledo
King, CB, Penn State
Burton, WR, Kentucky
Schuening, OG, Oregon State
Chamberlain, ILB, Tulsa
Vobora, OLB, IdahoThe Rams had what I believe to be the best draft in the club’s recent history. Chris Long is the type of individual who can do so many things that contribute to winning football games. All weekend long I heard pundits characterize the Rams’ second selection, Donnie Avery, as an undersized player with limited route-running skills, so I guess it must have been another guy who showed up at this year’s Senior Bowl and put on a show. John Greco is a great fit for the Rams at the LOG position. I loved his toughness, strength, feet and balance. Justin King has a great deal of speed and athletic potential, but isn’t close to where he needs to be in terms of consistency. Burton, Schuening, Chamberlain and Vobora were all excellent picks in the rounds they were selected. Buccaneers: D experts.scout.com/a.z?s=211&p=8&c=1&nid=3331524">Aqib Talib, CB, Kansas
Jackson, WR/KR, Appalachian St.
Zuttah, OG, Rutgers
Moore, DT, Maryland
Johnson, QB, San Diego
Hayes, OLB, Florida State
Boyd, RB, South CarolinaTalib is a very talented zone-defender with anticipation and ball skills, but has off-the-field concerns and doesn’t appear to be an easy guy to work with day-in and day-out. In my opinion, the Bucs over-drafted both Jackson and Zuttah. Jackson is not yet an adept receiver (far too many drops). And despite Zuttah being very impressive in his pro workout, he was just an adequate player at his college ROT position. Dre’ Moore is a short area run-stopper on the inside while QB Joshua Johnson is an athlete who put up some very good numbers at a lower level of play. Geno Hayes is acutely undersized but is a very good athlete and productive player. Cory Boyd has a past, but has matured over the past two seasons. That said, overall he’s just an ordinary back C- experts.scout.com/a.z?s=109&p=8&c=1&nid=3325673">Chris Johnson, RB, East Carolina
Jones, DE, Eastern Michigan
Stevens, TE, California
c=1&nid=3225677">Lavelle Hawkins, WR, California
c=1&nid=3347216">Stanford Keglar, OLB, Purdue
rare speed and outstanding receiving skills. I really like what he brings to the table, and if used properly he will give the Titans a player with special skills. Jason Jones played particularly well in the postseason all-star games, but I am not sold yet on his overall playing skills and potential. The pundits who thought that the Titans over-drafted William Hayes obviously did not make a school visit or attend the workout this spring at Wake Forest. This guy can flat-out play. Hawkins is a skilled receiver and route runner, but lacks top speed to separate. Stanford Kegler has size and athletic ability but missed far too many tackles in the open field. Not a great group in terms of talent, but the Titans are the best coaching staff in the league and do a great job of bringing along young players. Redskins: C experts.scout.com/a.z?s=109&p=8&c=1&nid=3229510">Devin Thomas, WR, Michigan St.
Davis, TE, USC
Kelly, WR, Oklahoma
Rinehart, OT, Northern Iowa
Tryon, CB, Arizona State
Brooks, P, Georgia Tech
Brennan, QB, Hawaii
Jackson, DE, Kansas State
Horton, S, UCLA
draft, but by the midpoint of the second round the Redskins had put a major dent in the top of most clubs’ draft boards. Both receivers have some holes, but both have size, good skills and I believe will become solid receivers within the league. Fred Davis is a receiving TE who is an up-the-seam threat, but he still hasn’t shown the consistency necessary to function at the point of attack. Chad Rinehart is very tough and was technically very sound, but he is very much an overachiever. I liked Justin Tyron’s toughness, but when he gets up tomorrow, he’s still going to be a little guy. I really liked punter Durant Brooks and also believe John Sullivan represented excellent value in round six. Safeties Kareem Moore and Chris Horton lack speed. And Brennan is at best a clipboard carrier in the professional game. g>

(AP Photo/S. Chernin)

By Tom Marino

Lead NFL Analyst
Posted May 1, 2008

Only five NFL teams earned an “A” in last weekend’s NFL Draft according to former pro scout Tom Marino. Was your favorite team one of them? Or was it one of the handful who earned a failing grade? Check out Marino’s grades for all 32 teams in this Scout.com feature.

Arizona Cardinals: B+

Round 1, Pick 16: Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie, CB, Tennessee St.
Round 2, Pick 50: Calais Campbell, DE, Miami
Round 3, Pick 81: Early Doucet, WR, LSU
Round 4, Pick 116: Kenny Iwebema, DE, Iowa
Round 5, Pick 149: Tim Hightower, RB, Richmond
Round 6, Pick 185: Chris Harrington, DE, Texas A&M
Round 7, Pick 225: Brandon Keith, OT, Northern IowaA very solid draft from beginning to end. The Birds shored-up some very big holes on the defense both up front and on the back end, while making three excellent picks on the offensive side of the football. Doucet should contribute quickly as an inside receiver. Hightower, who had 1,924 yards as a senior and zero fumbles in over 700 carries as a collegiate player, and Keith, an Oklahoma transfer with great feet and athletic ability, are late-round value picks. College Director Steve Keim and veteran area scouts Jerry Hardaway and David Razzano are quality football people. Outstanding Pro Director Jim Stanley, a veteran of over 45 years in the college and professional game retires at the end of May. He’ll be greatly missed.

Atlanta Falcons: B-

Round 1, Pick 3: Matt Ryan, QB, Boston College
Round 1, Pick 21: Sam Baker, OT, USC
Round 2, Pick 37: Curtis Lofton, LB, Oklahoma
Round 3, Pick 68: Chevis Jackson, CB, LSU
Round 3, Pick 84: Harry Douglas, WR, Louisville
Round 3, Pick 98: Thomas DeCoud, S, California
Round 5, Pick 138: Robert James, OLB, Arizona State
Round 5, Pick 154: Kroy Biermann, OLB, Montana
Round 6, Pick 172: Thomas Brown, RB, Georgia
Round 7, Pick 212: Wilrey Fontenot, CB, Arizona
Round 7, Pick 232: Keith Zinger, TE, LSUFor the first time in well over a decade the Falcons have a first-rate personnel man in Tom Dimitroff, who should quickly bring the club back to respectability. No less then five players from this year’s draft are expected to be starters by the end of the 2008 season. Mid-round picks Douglas and Decoud are both solid prospects who should factor quickly. Both Brown and Fontenot are quick, fast and athletic, but woefully undersized. The Falcons paid particular attention to character when making their selections. It’s not going to happen overnight, but I see only good things ahead for this club. Late-round selections (5th through 7th) did not excite me to any degree.

Baltimore Ravens: A-

Round 1, Pick 18: Joe Flacco, QB, Delaware
Round 2, Pick 55: Ray Rice, RB, Rutgers
Round 3, Pick 71: Tavares Gooden, OLB, Miami
Round 3, Pick 86: Tom Zbikowski, S, Notre Dame
Round 3, Pick 99: Oniel Cousins, DT, Texas-El Paso
Round 4, Pick 106: Marcus Smith, WR, New Mexico
Round 4, Pick 133: David Hale, OT, Weber State
Round 6, Pick 206: Haruki Nakamura, S, Cincinnati
Round 7, Pick 215: Justin Harper, CB, Virginia Tech
Round 7, Pick 240: Allen Patrick, RB, Oklahoma

I wouldn’t want to throw him to the wolves too quickly, but I have a distinct feeling that

Buffalo Bills:

Round 1, Pick 11: James Round 3, Pick 72: Chris Round 4, Pick 114: Reggie Round 4, Pick 132: Derek Round 5, Pick 147: Alvin Round 6, Pick 179: Xavier Round 7, Pick 219: Demetrius Round 7, Pick 224: Steve Round 7, Pick 251: Kennard

Carolina

Round 1, Pick 13: Jeff Round 3, Pick 67: Round 5, Pick 141: Round 7, Pick 221: Chicago Bears:

Round 1, Pick 14: Matt Round 3, Pick 70: Earl Round 3, Pick 90: Marcus Round 4, Pick 120: Craig Round 5, Pick 142: Zack Round 5, Pick 158: Kellen Round 7, Pick 208: Ervin Round 7, Pick 222: Chester Round 7, Pick 243: Joey Round 7, Pick 247: Kirk Round 7, Pick 248: Marcus

Cincinnati

Round 1, Pick 9: Jerome Round 3, Pick 77: Pat Round 3, Pick 97: Andre Round 4, Pick 112: Anthony Round 5, Pick 145: Jason Round 6, Pick 177: Corey Round 6, Pick 207: Matt Round 7, Pick 244: Angelo Round 7, Pick 246: Mario

Cleveland Browns:

Round 4, Pick 104: Martin Round 6, Pick 190: Ahtyba Round 6, Pick 191: Paul Round 7, Pick 231: Alex Hall, DE, St. AugustineBeau Bell, who was injured during Senior

Dallas Cowboys:

Round 1, Pick 22: Round 2, Pick 61: Round 5, Pick 143: Denver Broncos:

Round 1, Pick 12: Round 4, Pick 108: Round 5, Pick 139: Round 6, Pick 183: Round 7, Pick 227: Detroit Lions:

Round 1, Pick 17: Jordon Round 3, Pick 64: Kevin Round 3, Pick 87: Andre Round 3, Pick 92: Cliff Round 5, Pick 136: Kenneth Round 5, Pick 146: Jerome Round 7, Pick 216: Landon Round 7, Pick 218: Caleb

Green Bay

Round 2, Pick 36: Brian Round 2, Pick 60: Patrick Round 3, Pick 91: Jermichael Round 4, Pick 102: Jeremy Round 4, Pick 135: Josh Round 5, Pick 150: Breno Round 7, Pick 209:

Houston Texans:

Round 1, Pick 26: Antwaun Round 3, Pick 89: Steve Round 4, Pick 118: Xavier Round 5, Pick 151: Frank Round 6, Pick 173: Dominique Round 7, Pick 223: Alex

Indianapolis

Round 2, Pick 59: Philip Round 4, Pick 127: Jacob Round 5, Pick 161: Marcus Round 6, Pick 196: Tom Round 6, Pick 201: Steve Round 6, Pick 202: Mike Round 6, Pick 205: Pierre Round 7, Pick 236: Jamey

Jacksonville

Round 1, Pick 8: Quentin Round 5, Pick 155: Thomas Round 5, Pick 159: Trae Round 7, Pick 213: Chauncey

Kansas City

Round 1, Pick 5: Miami Dolphins:

Round 1, Pick 1: Phillip Round 2, Pick 57: Chad Round 3, Pick 66: Kendall Round 4, Pick 110: Shawn Round 6, Pick 176: Jalen Round 6, Pick 195: Donald Round 6, Pick 204: Lex Round 7, Pick 245: Lionel

Minnesota

Round 2, Pick 43: John Round 5, Pick 152: Letroy Round 6, Pick 187: John Round 6, Pick 193: Jaymar

New England

Round 1, Pick 10: Terrence Round 3, Pick 78: Shawn Round 3, Pick 94: Kevin Round 4, Pick 129: Jonathan Round 5, Pick 153: Matt Round 6, Pick 197: Bo

New Orleans

Round 1, Pick 7: Tracy Round 5, Pick 144: DeMario Round 5, Pick 164: Carl Round 6, Pick 178: Taylor Round 7, Pick 237: Adrian

New York Giants:

Round 1, Pick 31: Terrell Round 3, Pick 95: Mario Round 4, Pick 123: Bryan Round 5, Pick 165: Jonathan Round 6, Pick 198: Andre Round 6, Pick 199: Robert

New York Jets:

Round 1, Pick 6: Dustin Round 4, Pick 113: Dwight Round 5, Pick 162: Erik Round 6, Pick 171: Marcus Round 6, Pick 211: Nate

Oakland Raiders:

Round 1, Pick 4: Tyvon Round 4, Pick 125: Arman Round 6, Pick 169: Trevor Round 7, Pick 226: Chaz

Philadelphia

Round 2, Pick 47: DeSean Round 3, Pick 80: Bryan Round 4, Pick 109: Mike Round 4, Pick 117: Quintin Round 4, Pick 131: Jack Round 6, Pick 184: Michael Round 6, Pick 200: Joe Mays, ILB, North Dakota State
Round 6, Pick 203: Andrew Studebaker, DE, Wheaton
Round 7, Pick 230: King

Pittsburgh

Round 1, Pick 23: Limas Round 3, Pick 88: Bruce Round 4, Pick 130: Tony Round 5, Pick 156: Dennis Round 6, Pick 188: Mike Round 6, Pick 194: Ryan

San Diego

Round 1, Pick 27: Jacob Round 5, Pick 166: Marcus Round 6, Pick 192: DeJuan Round 7, Pick 234: Corey

San Francisco

Round 1, Pick 29: Chilo Round 3, Pick 75: Reggie Round 4, Pick 107: Cody Round 6, Pick 174: Josh Round 7, Pick 214: Larry

Seattle Seahawks:

Round 1, Pick 28: John Round 4, Pick 121: Red Round 5, Pick 163: Owen Round 6, Pick 189: Tyler Round 7, Pick 233: Justin Round 7, Pick 235: Brandon

St. Louis Rams:

Round 1, Pick 2: Donnie Round 3, Pick 65: John Round 4, Pick 101: Justin Round 4, Pick 128: Keenan Round 5, Pick 157: Roy Round 7, Pick 228: Chris Round 7, Pick 252: David

Tampa Bay

Round 1, Pick 20: Dexter Round 3, Pick 83: Jeremy Round 4, Pick 115: Dre Round 5, Pick 160: Josh Round 6, Pick 175: Geno Round 7, Pick 238: Cory

Tennessee Titans:

Round 1, Pick 24: Jason Round 3, Pick 85: Craig Round 4, Pick 103: William Hayes, DE, Winston-Salem State
Round 4, Pick 126: Chris Johnson is a multi-talented back with

Washington

Round 2, Pick 34: Fred Round 2, Pick 51: Malcolm Round 3, Pick 96: Chad Round 4, Pick 124: Justin Round 6, Pick 168: Durant Round 6, Pick 180: Kareem Moore, S, Nicholls State
Round 6, Pick 186: Colt Round 7, Pick 242: Robert Round 7, Pick 249: Chris The rest of the league might not have valued the receivers in this year’s

Click here for our NFL team directory of sites.
C

Scouting the 2008 QB’s

Gus — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:06:44 +0000

Here is the post that everyone has been waiting for, the quarterbacks. Take a look and see where they rank as well as their scouting reports and decide which QB you think that your team should draft to lead them for the next 10 years. As with every draft and with QB’s I am sure that someone on this list will come out of no where and be the next Tom Brady (6th round) and one of these guys that are projected to go at the top of the draft will turn into the next Akili Smith, or David Klingler. The draft is not an exact science, so take all of this info and play GM for the day and decide who you would take.

1 12 Ryan Matt Boston College QB 6046v 228v 4.95v I

Chance to be a very good one. Can make all of the necessary throws Accurate in the short and intermediate zones. Will throw off back foot some, but his forte was throwing the seam passer. Smart player who won’t be overwhelmed. Better from the gun then from under the center. Had some questions about his ability to see the underneath zone, but really liked this players stroke. Playing with a very limited surrounding cast. A one man show. Round # 1.

2 5 Flacco Joe Delaware U QB 6063v 236v 4.86v I

Has outstanding size, body strength and an A-1 throwing arm. Was an accurate thrower who didn’t lose his composure in pressure situation. Very poised while posessing solid intangibles. Sorts things out well. Good ball placement on short and intermediate throws. Not a threat to run the ball, but can make time while showing good rush sense. Surprisingly effective throwing on the move. High ceiling player with strong 2nd round draft potential.

3 7 Henne Chad Michigan U QB 6027v 230v 4.95v I

Experienced 4 year regular who played injured for much of 07. Has a very strong arm and was tough minded but I thought he was streaky with his accuracy, Throw mechanics need some work, and was marginal to escape, but I liked his overall game. Improved throwing touch and flair control. Was not a threat to run the football but is strong and can make time in the pocket. Played much of the 07 less then 100%. Round 2 draft consideration.

4 12 Brohm Brian Louisville U QB 6027v 230v 4.85v I

Productive, experienced system quarterback. Accurate in the under zones and showed a relatively quick arm. Distributes the ball well and can manage the game effectively. Can’t move or get away from the blitz. Lacks a big arm. Marginal on intermediate or the deep ball accruacy. Had problems locating the backside backer on some under throws. Anoher in a long line of overrated Louisville QB’s. Back up playing potential. Mid to late second round consideration

5 10 Booty John David USC QB 6023v 218v 4.93v F

Does nothing to get you real excited as a player, but is an efficient serviceable quarterback. Has an adequate throwing arm, was an accurate short and intermediate passer. Can throw effectively on the move. Good decision maker who is getting the most out of his ability. Football smart. I would today view him as a back up player within the league who when called upon could potentially contribute. 3th to 4th round draft potential.

6 3 Woodson Andre Kentucky U QB 6040v 229v 4.86v I

Long deliberate throwing delivery. Didn’t sense the rush especially well and took too many sacks. Awkward touch passer and throwing on the move. Marginal deep passer. Good looking physically (strong and proportioned). System passer. More questions then answers; Read entire field? Process? Put ball in tight windows? Round 4 – 5 consideration

7 10 Brink Alex Washington St QB 6022v 211v 5.02v F

Four year regular. Improved throwing release and delivery. Highly intelligent and experienced player. Needs work on his deep ball, but overall was both productive and efficient. Accurate passer in the under zones who was poised and made good throwing decisions. Improved throwing delivery and release point. Can throw from awkward positions and on the move. A whole lot better then I had expected. Late round (6 – 7) draft consideration

8 14 Morris Bernard Marshall U QB 6030v 223v 4.76v I

Had 1 off field incident which might come into play. Biggest surprise of 2007. Top athlete, who can make time in the pocket, escape and spin the ball . Has a very live arm & although he had things he will need to improve (locks on his primary, will flush quickly and work receivers) I loved how he delivered the ball. Can stick it into a tight seam. Streaky with his accruacy. Has the tools to be something special down the line. Consider rounds 4.- 5

9 10 Ainge Erik Tennessee U QB 6054v 225v 5.04v F

Is a big athlete good looking player a great deal of playing experience, but I was extremely disappointed in his arm strength, throwing accruacy (particularly deep) and decision making skills. Has an over the top throwing delivery but does not throw a tight ball. Was neither quick or highly mobile in the pocket. or as a runner. Didn’t see much in the way of creativity or instincts particularly when you consider his playing background. Round 6 – 7

10 14 Morelli Anthony Penn St QB 6035v 231v 5.09v F

Has all the tools you look for in a QB; an athletic body, very strong throwing arm & far better movement then I had expected, but is acutely under coached & unprepared for the job of being a professional QB. Has a violent over hand delivery & when he’s on his game has as much ability as anyone in the draft. Can make all the throws; out, dig, fade and comeback, Going to have to start from square 1 with this player, but has a big upside. A 6th – 7th round steal.

11 15 Brennan Colt Hawaii U QB 6023v 207v 4.95e F

System QB who has at best an adequate throwing arm and a very funky throwing delivery. Deep arm was highly questionable. Marginal ability to get away from pressure.Accurate and efficient on the underneath stuff. Is tough minded and showed good instincts. Has put up some unbelieveable throwing numbers, but his poor performance at the Senior Bowl and vs San Jose can also not be overlooked. Would give 6th to 7th round draft consideration.

12 7 O’Connell Kevin San Diego St QB 6051v 223v 4.64v I

Athletic big man. Has a big arm but was inconsistent with his accuracy and ball placement. Has come a long way in the past season, but I still feel he has a very long way to come. Has impressive movement for a big man and threw adequately on the move. Led State in rushing in 2007. Has a chance. Late round draft (7) or priority free agent consideration.

13 11 Johnson Joshua U of San Diego QB 6026v 213v 4.55v I

Is a good looking athlete who put up some very impressive numbers at a very low level of competition. Moves around well in the pocket showing both mobility and running skills. Don’t think he was a quick decision maker, but also didn’t put the football in harm’s way too often. Very effecient at a low level of play. Put up some very impressive numbers, but I don’t like his arm and will needs a great deal of work with his mechanics. Rd. # 7 or PFA

14 13 Ostrander T.C. Stanford U QB 6021v 227v 5.00e F

Has a quick arm and was an effective passer underneath. Overall arm strength was at best adequate and I didn’t see much in the way of mobility or pocket presence. Felt he competed hard and made good decisions, but overall has just an outside chance of factoring at the pro level. Struggled some with the deep ball. Streaks of inaccuracy. Durability concerns. Has a chance to be a third, but really don’t see special skills with this player. 7th or priority free agent.

15 9 Keller Sam Nebraska U QB 6035v 241v 5.03v F

Senior transfer with size and a strong arm, but doesn’t have the movement, quickness and or feet to play beyond this level of play. Streaky with accuracy and I would have to question his overall decision making skills. Good physical stature. Started quickly but appeared to regress as the season progressed. Doesn’t appear to know where people were on the field. A check down guy. Free agent with just an outside chance to factor.

16 8 Roach Brad Catawba QB 6056v 250v 5.18v

Has a strong arm and a quicker and more mobile then I originally expected. Is a three year regular. Is a three year regular with a quick compact throwing delivery. Showed adequate throwing accuracy (will work receivers some). Needs to use his lower half better. Marginal run skills, but showed the ability to aviod and make time in the pocket. Has little in the way of a surrounding cast. Possible late round selection, but more likely a priority free agent.

17 12 Smith Paul Tulsa U QB 6012v 208v 4.97v

Smith is a heady performer with good playing intangables. Is smart, aware and was an accurate thrower in the underneith zones. Got the ball out quickly always (cocked to throw), can look off defenders and made good throwing decisions. Has a barely adequate arm and was not imposing physically. Functional, but doesn’t have starting potential in my estimation. Possible late draft, but more likely a free agent. Possible third or practice squad performer.

18 2 Santos Ricky New Hampshire U QB 6011v 215v 5.03v

Very smart, experienced, productive and efficient. Prepares himseld well. Instinctive school yard type player in the Doug Flutie type mold. A four year regular who has put up some very impressive numbers during his college playing career. Was an accurate thrower who distributed the football well. Good anticipation ability to make plays. Appears shorter then then his listed height. Wouldn’t bet against him making it, but isn’t exactly what you are looking for.

19 3 Wright Kyle Miami U QB 6033v 218v 4.90v

Big good looking athlete who has been given every opportunity to succeed, but has never done it over the long haul. Has a strong arm and tools you look for, but is not an accurate passer nor did he make consistently good throwing decisions. Didn’t think he consistently threw the football on time and in all games viewed, really worked the receivers. I have to believe that the pro game is going to be just too fast for this player. Priority free agent.

20 15 Flynn Matt LSU QB 6022v 231v 4.81v

Has too many things to fix with this player’s throwing mechanics. Not an accurate passer on intermediate and deep throws. Barely adequate arm strength his ball appeared to have little life coming out of his hand. Didn’t look off defenser (stares down primary) dellivery quickness. Mobility and pocket presense were marginal. Did show both toughness and made some plays at critical times during the 07 season, but I see him as having just marginal play potential.

21 17 Hill Nick Southern Illinois U QB 6025v 216v 4.85v

Western Kentucky transfer. Left hand QB with better then expected athletic ability (former basketball player) Liked his size and the ability to make time with his feet. Made good throwing deceisons underneith. Didn’t like his throwing mechanics (very deliberate throwing stroke) and his arm was just adequate. Lots of things to fix (poor footwork), but has size and put up some impressive numbers. Free agent with practice squad potential

22 1 Lee Xavier Florida St QB 6030v 233v 4.88v

Top prep QB recruit with size and a very strong arm. Can get the ball out quickly when he sees things down the field. Can throw on the move and had adequate throwing accuracy. Is just not a quick processor and has been very inconsistent over his entire college playing career.. Has a strong athletic body and moved around surprisingly well, but the professional game is going to be just too fast for this individual. Developmental potential only. Game too fast.

23 10 Dixon Dennis Oregon U QB 6032v 195v 4.60e

Very thin and lacks the throwing mechanics you look for in a pro QB prospect. Has an adequate arm, but showed little touch and his mechanics were poor.. More of a dart thrower then a pure passer. Improved decision maker in 07, and really took to the new playing system,but in the end there are still far too many things to be fixed. Had a late season injury (Lt Knee ACL) and is also in the Atlanta Braves farm system. Wouldn’t consider with my club.

24 12 Mitchell Blake So Carolina U QB 6026v 219v 4.95e

Was a highly recruited prep player who did not come close to playing to his full playing potential at the college level. Has size, a good throwing arm snd more then adequate movement in the pocket. Was disappointed in his throwing accruacy and decision making. Showed a tendency to hold the football, but mechanically can get the ball out quickly. Has had some off the field problems and I would question his dependability. Too inconsistent in his play

25 15 O’Hara Ryan Central Oklahoma U QB 6060e 230e

Arizona and Scottsdale CC transfer. Has rare size and better throwing skills them I ex[ected. Good athlete also lettered in basketball at Arizona. Top prep QB prospect. Needs some help with his footwork, but his delivery was short and quick. Poor sourounding cast and injury limited his playing production in 2007 (6 TD’s and 13 Int) but I liked the way he spun the football. Going to have to work on ball placement and deep accruacy. Not a washout.

Scouting the 2008 RB’s

Gus — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:10:08 +0000

Lead by possibly the most talented player in this years draft Darren McFadden, here is a look at the rest of the runnning backs of the 2008 draft.

1 5 McFadden Darren Arkansas U RB 6012v 211v 4.36v D

Best back to enter the draft in the past two decades. Is a big back who showed excellent quicks, moves in the hole and the speed to run away from folks. Breaks secured tackles and finishes. Good backside vision, excellent hands and was extremely dangerous in space. Runs tall, but can create and finish. A slasher, who can put his foot in the ground and go. Best football player in the country. My first player off the board. A young Eric Dickerson.

2 5 Mendenhall Rashard Illinois U RB 5101v 225v 4.45v I

This guy does a lot of things that impact a football game. Has size, outstanding take off quickness and the speed to take it to the house. Instinctive runner who has the speed to get the corner and the gear changes to run away from second and third level defenders. Can create in space and was an exceptional receiver out of the backfield. Should impact quickly. Round # 1 draft consideration. 262 1,681 – 6.4 -17 TD’s in 2007.

3 5 Johnson Chris East Carolina U RB 5110v 197v 4.29v I

Has outstanding speed & run instincts. Tougher then expected inside.. As a receiver will line up in the slot, motion across the formation and come out of the backfield, but proved to be a real threat to take it to the house. Impressive hands.Dangerous return man who hit the seam and goes. Not as patient inside as he should be but ran hard. Not a big man by today’s standards, was a marginal blocker and not big tackle breaker, but is without question the real deal.

4 25 Charles Jamaal Texas U RB 5110v 200v 4.41v I

A one cut guy with vision, good balance, top speed and a great burst. I liked the way he hit the hole, bounced it and got the corner and out ran second and third level defenders. Was not a big finisher inside (just wasn’t very strong on contact and put the football on the ground far to0 frequently). Still developing (not a every down player at this time), but I really liked what I saw in this players game. Has run 10.26/100m. Draft # 1

5 25 Jones Felix Arkansas U RB 5101v 207v 4.49v I

Exciting zone runner with the speed to get the corner & outrun the pursuit angle. Is sudden with vision & ability to plant and go. Shows multiple cutting skills, good hands and was dangerous in space. Has bouncy legs and the ability break secured tackles. Not a lot of thread off the tires having been a back up throughout his entire career. Whether he can carry the full load & become feature back in the NFL is still an unknown, but I like what I’ve seen to this point.

6 28 Stewart Jonathan Oregon U RB 5102v 235v 4.48v I

Big productive between the tackles runner who broke secured tackles and finished his runs. Liked his ability to get up in the hole, bounce it outside or see the backside cutbacks. Appeared a little stiff and didn’t run with the type of speed he showed at the scouting combine. Runs hard. Has good pad level and finishes his runs consistently. An 80-20 catcher on flat, circle, screen and arrow routes. Late 1st or top of the second draft potneital.

7 25 Forte Matt Tulane U RB 6013v 217v 4.47v I

This is a highly productive (361 – 2127 – 5.9 – 23), between the tackles runner that moves the pile and breaks secured tackles. Not nifty or elusive but gets north-south quickly and finishes everything. Can catch and advance the ball. Doesn’t have break away speed, but at games end did a lot of positive things. Appears to thrive on work. Excellent red zone runner.

8 24 Smith Kevin Central Florida U RB 6011v 217v 4.51v F

Has good vision, balance, and lower body surge. Can breaks secured tackles and finishes. Is not an elusive runner but is a strong legged runner with the speed to run away from 2nd and 3rd level people. Has a low center of gravity and showed the ability to hit a point and go. Marginal down the field receiver.. (struggles to catch) Under rated and appreciated player. Not flashy, but does a lot of positive things during the course of a game. Rd 3 consideration.

9 27 Rice Ray Rutgers U RB 5080v 199v 4.47v G

Has excellent take off quicks to press the LOS, moves in the hole, very good vision and the speed to take it to the house. Hard nosed kid who finished his runs inside. Highly competitive player. Good but not exceptional receiver (screen, flat, and arrow route type hands). Is short in stature and as an “I” back little is known about his run or pass blocking skills. Should impack quickly as a change of pace, all purpose back, but does he have the stuff to be a front line player. Round 3

10 22 Hightower Tim Richmond U RB 6000v 223v 4.59v F

Led the nation sub division in rushing on 2007 (327-1924-5.9-20). A zone runner who posesses good initial quickness to press the line of scrimmage. Showed moves in the hole and once he broke the LOS exhibited multiple cutting skills in the open area. A strong runner who who can break secured tackles and finishes.Fine receiver who caught and adjusted to the football well. Has never fumbled in over 700 carries during his college career. Round 4 – 5

11 10 Slaton Steve West Virginia U RB 5091v 197v 4.49v G

A patient runner with suttle moves, who showed the ability to read blocks and react (very good feel). Quicker then fast, although has the speed to get the corner. Liked his ability to see the backside cutback. Confident catcher who can adjust catch the ball down the field. Not as elusive as expected (more of a 1 cut and go guy, but judges distances well. Production has declined over the last 3 season which is a concern, but is a steady dependable back. Rd # 3

12 22 Choice Tashard Georgia Tech RB 5104v 215v 4.51v G

Earns every yard he gets. Quicker then fast. Good run instincts, hands and run pass routes. Not a home run guy but gets tough yards between the tackles. Lacks top speed to create daylight and beat the angle. Has puts the ball on the ground some and was never 100% during the 07 season. Was a willing but not effective blocker. Very strong lower torso. Transfer from the U of Oklahoma where he backed up Adrian Peterson. Has 4th round draft potential.

13 23 Washington Chancey USC RB 5113v 211v 4.44v F

Not as physical a back as I would have expect given his physical make up. More of a dancer then power back. Ran the hole, but his feet tend to stop on contact. Adequate catch and run after skills. Has solid back up and special teams potential. Good cutback skills and vision to see the backside. Has plus hands and overall receiving skills. Has had a number of injuries to go along with academic problems. Has mid round draft potential

14 33 Parmele Jalen Toledo U RB 5114v 224v 4.52v I

Big strong back who hits it up inside with authority. Can breaks inside tackles and move the pile on the inside. Productive between the tackle runner with more then adequate speed. Good feet, vision, pad level at contact and finish. Fights for yards, and was particularly effective in short yardage and red zone situations. Not a home run hitter nor was he an elusive runner in the open field.

15 20 Hart Mike Michigan U RB 5087v 206v 4.76v F

Tough I-back who consistently moved the chains inside. Got north-south runner quickly while showing good physical toughness. Is undersized (short but very thick) and does not have the necessary speed. Has done it at the highest level for his entire career showing natural run instincts. Decision making was questionable. A big concern is his work load (1,015 carries) over a 4 year career. Only so many war in a little man’s body. Second day draft consideration.

16 22 Savage Dantrell Oklahoma St RB 5082v 187v 4.51v F

Juco guy who has come a very long way. Change of pace back who hit the hole quickly, showing both balance, feet, very good run instincts. Showed multiple cutting skills and a spin move that can freeze a defender. Talented player, but is a little guy who is not going to have the physical stature for fulltime play. Has been injured in each of the past two seasons.. Caught well in the under zone. Not a complete player, but should factor as a 3rd down back

20 32 Simpson Chad Morgan St RB 5085v 216v 4.44v G

South Florida transfer who had a very productive year in his only season of play at Morgan. Is a strong inside runner with quickness, quick feet, instincts, balance and speed. Is strong legged and broke many secured tackles at this level. Tough inside but also showed creativity in space. Not featured in their offense as a pass receiver.& was not used on returns (feature back). Has the run skills, but would like to have seen him catch, block and or return. Rd 6-7

18 3 Boyd Cory So Carolina U RB 6004v 213v 4.57v F

Has good vision and feel running inside the tackles. Was patient, read blocks well and finished his runs. Doesn’t have top speed/explosion, wasn’t an elusive nor was he a tackle breaker. Lacks the speed to consistently get the corner. Did catch the ball well on screens arrow and swing routes.Just a good college back but didn’t do anything to set him apart from the rest of the pack. Back-up special team type player. Draft consideration; round 6 – 7.

19 23 Patrick Allan Oklahoma U RB 6006v 198v 4.58v G

Did not play well in his first year as a starter. Not a natural instinctive runner. Is a tough guy who ran hard inside, but appeared to run with blinders on (no vision). Doesn’t run with much in the way of instincts. Best area of his game appears to be his efforts on speial teams (effective gunner). Overall, I liked this player toughness and versatility, but his lack of instincts concerns me greatly. Would give some late round consideration.

17 26 Torain Ryan Arizona St RB 6003v 222v 4.59v F

Tough inside runner who move the chain inside. I felt he made good decisions. A slasher who judges distances well. Not particularly fast nor was he an elusive runner. Said to have good football smarts and instincts. Runs hard, showed balance, breaks tackles and secured the football. Needs to keep his pads down more consistently. Has had a history of injuries over his career. A good college back but not a difference maker. Draft consideration; rds 6 – 7.

21 20 Brown Thomas Georgia U RB 5083v 204v 4.55v G

Tough feisty little all purpose back who plays extremely hard. Runs the hole, but was essentially a straight line runner. compact (pro style runner – plant and go). Good finisher. A proto-type third down back, but I didn’t think he ran good routes and his hand appeared barely adequate. Style of play will likely shorten his career. You have to like him, but realistically, what do you do with him. Late round draft potential, but is more likely a priority free agent.

22 6 Green-Ellis BenJarvus Mississippi U RB 5105v 219v 4.66v F

A serviceable athlete, who rushed for a thousand plus yards since transferring from Indiana. North -south runner who showed balance and run vision. Showed some inside running strength and the ability move the pile. Once he broke the scrimmage line, I didn’t see either the burst or creativity in the open field. Inconsistent to get to the corner. Limited exposure within the passing game (10 catches in two seasons). No special skills. Late consideration.

24 22 Little Rafael Kentucky U RB 5086v 194v 4.50e G

Skilled tough runner with good instincts and vision / Judges distances well / Has talent but is acutely undersized, lacks break away speed and just wasn’t sudden. Injuries (knees) appears to have eroded his playing skills. Adequate hands (check down and screens), but I don’t see him running the wheel. Has a chance of being drafted, but is more likely a priority free agent.

23 6 Lumpkin Kregg Georgia U RB 5114v 226v 4.73v F

Smooth runner with good vision. Hits it in there with authority, but has been banged up over the past two seasons and has had very few touches (played with big cast on his thumb early) Started the season in a three man rotation, but his role deminished as the season progressed. Was not a factor in the passing game. Has a pro body and athletic ability, but at this stage is a long shot to make it. Late round potential, but is more likely a priority free agent.

25 42 Korte Steve LSU (Ex) RB 6005v 233v 4.37v

Big, strong talented back whose career was cut short due to to a series of events including an knee reconstruction academic suspension. Is a big powerful inside runner with limited experience and virtually no playing experience. Explosive player with excellent hands. Good special team’s potential. Son of former Saints star of the same name.

Scouting the 2008 WR’s

Gus — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:57:26 +0000

Here is a look at the playmakers of 2008, your WR’s:

1 4 Kelly Malcolm Oklahoma U WR 6036v 224v 4.50e I

Impressive looking player with excellent hands, body control & ability to adjust to the ball. Catches equally well on or off his person. Uses size to effectively shield defender on under routes or in the red zone. Has the athletic ability & strength to avoid the hold up and the speed to climb a defender on his open releases. Liked ability to snatch the ball away from his body. Should factor quickly as an inside receiver & develop into a frontline player.

2 5 Thomas Devin Michigan St WR 6017v 216v 4.43v I

Has excellent athletic skills, versatility, good hands, and was a real threat after the catch. Runs well and showed the ability to accelerate at the top of the route. Potential # 1 receiver with a club. Top return potential (quick, instinctive, breaks tackles and has a burst). Six catches as a soph and 79 as a junior. Used mostly on slip screens and shallow screens. Round 1 draft consideration

3 86 Manningham Mario Michigan U WR 5116v 181v 4.45v G

A talented receiver who runs well in his pads. Is a proven commodity with athletic ability who makes big game changing plays on the football. Showed a good take off on open releases and broke off a point effectively. Excellent tracking skills paticularly on the deep ball and has soft hands (don’t watch Ohio St). Changes speeds well and will contribute within the running game. Late 1 top of the 2nd draft consideration.

4 5 Caldwell Andre Florida U WR 6002v 204v 4.38v I

Go to receiver who has regained the foot speed he had prior to his knee surgery. Has size, experience & has been a very productive player. Works underneath effectively. Solid run after skills. Impressive getting in and out of a break on speed cuts. Gets head around & locates the ball. I really liked his work at the senior bowl, where he showed his skills and savvy. Bigger, faster & more powerfully built then what I remembered. Mid 2nd round draft

5 9 Doucet Early LSU WR 6001v 209v 4.53v F

Skilled receiver with size, speed, quicks, body control & hands. Gets head around and in and out of a break well. Adequate RAC and instincts. Had problem with him running the in route from the left side (too much chopping). Can avoid the hold up effectively with both power & finesse releases. Will work away from the ball and contribute in the run game. Bottom of the 1st round top of the 2nd draft potential. Not a great one but has few holes. Anquan Boldin clone.

6 2 Avery Donnie Houston U WR 5111v 182v 4.36v I

A very fluid, talented athlete. Explosive on his take off. Closes the cushion quickly & got in and out of a break extremely well. Has good but not exceptional hands. Showed courage & has the ability to make the difficult off target catch. After the catch was dangerous in space and when he saw a crack, he was gone. Had some problems with his deep over the shoulder adjustments & didn’t always finish vertically. Should contribute quickly. Round 2 consideration.

7 4 Sweed Limas Texas U WR 6037v 215v 4.56v F

Was injured for much of the 2007 season. Has rare size and a huge receiving radius and although realize he has a tremendous amount of playing potential, but I thought he lacked concentration and consistency. Tracks the ball extremely well. I particularly liked the way he adjusted to the deep ball. Very awkward getting into a lateral break (plants his heels). Still too many unknowns to consider this player in either of the top two rounds.

8 1 Jackson DeSean California U WR 5096v 169v 4.39v G

Undersized “Z” receiver with rare speed & as natural a pass catcher as there is in this year’s draft. An outstanding athlete with rare quickness and body control. Comes out of a break with a lot of juice. Works back to the ball with confidence & can snatch it away from his body. lightening in the bottle after the catch. Dangerous punt return man who can take it to the house. Will get lazy in his routes and lose his concentration. Acutely undersized. Round 2 – 3

9 85 Douglas Harry Louisville U WR 5112v 176v 4.54v G

Talented player with rare timed speed. Is quick, fast, smart, tough and competitive. Gets in and out of a break well although I felt he got open more by scheme rather then by individual routes. Excellent instincts run vision. On the negative side, he is really small (can he hold up)? Competed inside, seldom won in traffic. Dropped far too many balls on contact. Is a ball player, but I wouldn’t roll the dice too soon on this player. Round 2 – 3 consideration

10 27 Nelson Jordy Kansas St WR 6025v 217v 4.53v I

Top nickel and inside receiving prospect. Has size and can uncover effectively underneath. Good zone awareness and ability to catch on and off his person. Will catch on contact and gets N-S quickly.Is sneaky fast, but lacks the juice to run away from the top defenders in the NFL Can make the difficult catch and showed good sideline awareness. Good block effort (adequate results). Is going to surprise a lot of people at the pro level. Round 3-4.

11 4 Royal Eddie Virginia Tech WR 5095v 184v 4.46v G

Little man, who was both quick and fast. Has good hands but likes the ball in on his body whenever possible. Has small hands and a short receving radius. Has the quicks and feet to avoid the hold up, but was more effective lining up in the slot. Can track down the field, but doesn’t offer the QB much in the way of a target. Questionable to win in traffic. Adept KO and punt returner; catches well, hits the crease and goes. Gd courage and judgement. Round 3 – 4.

12 82 Hardy James Indiana U WR 6053v 217v 4.53v F

Early entrant into draft. IU records for receptions (191) yards (2,740) and TD (36). Played 2 years of basketball before focusing totally on football. Rare size, firm hands and physical dexterity. Has good speed but doesn’t have quick speed. Wasn’t physical or creative as a runner after the catch and did little to nothing away from the ball (won’t block). Gave up on balls far too quickly and goes down too easily after the catch.Primarily a red zone threat at this stage.

13 21 Moore Kenneth Wake Forest U WR 5106v 195v 4.50v G

Productive and very tough inside receiver. Former RB with very good hands (will catch on contact). Ran predominately choice routes between the numbers with no fear or apprehension. Showed running strength and was creative after the catch. Runs well, but I question whether he has the juice to separate vertically at the next level. A highly dependable return man who should factor at the pro level as a multi-purpose inside slot receiver. Round 4 – 5.

14 19 Burton Keenan Kentucky U WR 6004v 201v 4.49v I

Really like this players overall game. Competes very hard in both games and practice and prepares himself like a pro on game week. Has good hands, playing smarts and position awareness, but does not play near as fast as his timed speed. I didn’t see any glaring negatives in this player’s game, but he also may not have a true long suit (non factor vs LSU and Vandy). Don’t see starting potential, but should factor as a back up, returner and special teams performer.

15 19 Hubbard Paul Wisconsin U WR 6026v 221v 4.48v F

Outstanding size and speed / top prep triple jumper in the country. Very limited playing production in 07. Drops too many easy ones in my opinion to be considered with the top level of receivers. Good body control and route quickness. Can adjust on the move and find the open area. Skilled player, but just does not play to his timed speed. A 3rd receiver type who with experience could develop into a functional second. Has 3-4 round draft potential.

16 14 Shields Arman Richmond U WR 6006v 193v 4.40v I

Played in only two games in 07. An athlete with size, firm hands & tracking ability. Closes the cushion quickly on his open release & can track the ball downfield. On his under routes drops his base & got in and out of his routes (some flag). Uses his body to effectively shield the defender from the ball & will catch in contact. Adjusts on the move and sat in the zone hole effectively. Good teams background although is not a returner.Solid middle rd potential (4-5).

17 19 Simpson Jerome Coastal Carolina WR 6016v 198v 4.44v I

Good body control, size and the ability track & catch the ball.. Is smart and adaptable, but was raw and underdeveloped in terms of athletic ability & position skills (question route running skills & speed to separate).. Loved the way he went upcompeted for the ball in traffic. Simply “out athletes” people at this level of play. A semi long stride, who was not a burner, but there is no question as to his ability to make the difficult catch..5th to 7th consideration.

18 10 Bennett Earl Vanderbilt U WR 5114v 209v 4.52v F

Productive, game ready player. Has quick feet, and got in and out of his routes well and was a confident catcher. Good zone awareness. Made easy adjustments to off target throws. Can make the difficult catch and showed sideline awareness. Don’t see a lot of foot speed or vertical separation skills. I see him as a steady contributing nickel receiver. Similar to the Giants Steve Smith in playing style. Should be given solid 4th round consideration.

19 22 Hall D.J. Alabama U WR 6017v 193v 4.59v F

A some off the field baggage which will need to be addressed at the scouting combine and spring workouts. Early on didn’t buy into Saban’s program, but came around during the fall. Has been a playmaker over his career. Has size, very good physical dexterity and showed the ability to track ball and separate vertically. Will drop balls (concentration) and his timed speed is not near what I expected. Late 3rd to early 4th consideration.

20 22 Alridge Anthony Houston U WR 5090v 170v 4.39v G

College running back who also alligns in the slot. Has rare speed and quickness. Is undersized but showed excellent running instincts. Has feet, body control and balance, but was not as fluid out of a laterall break as I expected him to be. Will need some refinement of skills, and isn’t a big man, but has a chance to be something special as a receiver, KOR and special situation back.Not a believer; see UTEP, Oregon, and Rice. Draft consideration round 3 – 4.

21 13 Johnson Steve Kentucky U WR 6017v 210v 4.52v F

Late bloomer. Has size and straight speed but was very inconsistent as an underclassman. Much improved hands confidence and playing toughness. Wouldn’t work inside the numbers in the past, and although isn’t a sure thing in this area has improved a good deal. Don’t think he is a natural catcher, but my gut tells me we haven’t seen the best from this player yet. Size and speed are a hard combination to beat. Has strong early second day consideration

22 9 Bryant Dorien Purdue U WR 5096v 174v 4.51v G

Up and down performer in 07.Has outstanding speed and a vertical burst (can run by you). Is undersized & didn’t catch the ball as clean as one would want. Dangerous in the open field & as a return man. Did little away from the ball or within the running game. Awful blocker (very little effort). Pain in the butt, but not a bad kid. Talks too much. Literally took over the Iowa game. Similar, but not as explosive as Ted Ginn. Round 3-4 consideration.

23 3 Franklin Will Missouri U WR 6004v 214v 4.39v I

Has size & real talent, but was disappointed in his overall game, Wasn’t tough & didn’t make plays in competitive situation. After the catch will hit the deck when he sensed body heat (watching too many pro games). Virtually all of his production was outside the hash & underneith. Does show route quicks & has the body control to be outstanding in this area. Top talent, but is not the same player when the bullets start to fly. Round 3-5 consideration.

24 2 Morgan Josh Virginia Tech WR 6002v 219v 4.45v I

I really liked his physical stature and speed, but does not have natural hands (dropped far too many balls). Has track speed, but will clutch to start, thus negating his both quicks and explosive in his open releases. Vs the press, will gives up chest off the go. Has good hands and can stem a route effectively but his uneven concentration and attention to detail bothers me (2 drops vs UNC).

25 12 Bowman Adarius Oklahoma St WR 6027v 223v 4.77v F

Has been a productive player since transferring from UNC in 2005, but I was rather disappointed in his play at the senior bowl practices. Very stiff running style who didn’t show the speed to push a defender on his open releases.Can’t drop his hips on his under routes. I liked his size, but in my opinion was not a natural catcher. Mismatches many defenders and showed some strength after the catch, but wasn’t nifty or instinctive. Would not give this player 1st day draft consideration.

26 2 Reynaud Darius West Virginia U WR 5092v 201v 4.51v G

Talented athletic receiver who caught a majority of his passes on bubble and slip screens, hitches and shallow crosses. Has firm hands, can make off target adjustments and catch on contact. Adept catching both off and on his person. After the catch, got north south quickly while showing creativity after the catch. showed a burst to run under the deep ball, but lacks the juice to separate vertically. Solid KOR prospect Late consideration who has a chance.

27 16 Purify Maurice Nebraska U WR 6031v 224v 4.53v F

Has size, athletic ability and body quicks. Firm hands & catching range, although his concentration level was not always evident. Runs well in his pads, but not a true race horse. Can break off a point on his under routes showing strength after the catch. High ceiling, but his position skills are far from fully developed. Add to the puzzle some highly publicized off the field issues and we see an incomplete puzzle developing. Risk – Reward Player Rd. 5-7.

28 81 Harper Justin Virginia Tech WR 6034v 213v 4.61v F

Has all of the physical qualities you look for in a professional receiver, something appears to be missing. Has good hands and was best on underneith routes where he caught the ball and turned up the field. Showed a tendency to breaks off his routes (doesn’t finish) Was neither coverage aware or very instinctive. Didn’t compete for the ball on the inside. Should be a dominent player but wasn’t. Draft consideration 5 – 6

29 85 Monk Marcus Arkansas U WR 6042v 221v 4.51v F

Big slot receiver who gives a club a huge miss match advantage particularly in the red zone or on crossing routes. Needs a pre release to consistently get into his routes. Can reach and extend away form the body. A special situation player who just doesn’t have the juice one looks for at the position. Wasn’t sudden in and out of a break and lack the top speed to separate vertically, but in the right offensive system could contribute significantly in the under zones. Round 4 to 5 draft potential.

30 7 Hawkins Lavelle California U WR 5110v 187v 4.59v F

A skilled receiver who showed come immaturity in the past (will pout and isn’t the toughest guy on the block. Has shown very good route running and catching skills. Was a dependable third down receiver working in the under zones and was adept working the sidelines. Gives you some added return potential. Lacks the deep speed to factor as a vertical threat, and doesn’t process quickly (need to keep it simple) Late round draft potential / 6-7

31 2 Jackson Dexter Appalachian St WR 5094v 182v 4.37v G

Little guy with a great deal of speed and quickness. Did some double catching but overall I thought he caught the ball well. Explosive in and out of a break. showed the ability to adjust and run under the ball on vertical routes. After the catch runs away from people in the open field. Not as savvy as David Patton, but has more more acceleration. In spite of his size, proved to be a tough guy on the inside. Round 6 to 7 consideration.

32 2 Blackman Darrell No Carolina St WR 5103v 210v 4.62v F

Former RB who has proven to be a tough versatile player. I liked his hands and his ability to catch with confidence. After the catch I liked his toughness and vision. Needs further route development, but feel this player has the skills to factor in a professional setting. Return skills only enhance this players overall potential . Not an instant study, but could contribute quickly in a number of ways. Has late second day draft potential. Round 6 – 7.

33 86 Henry Marcus Kansas U WR 6035v 207v 4.58v F

The star of the East West shrine game, was just a guy during the 07 season. Is a good atlete with size, but was an inconsistent catcher. Lacks route polish (raw) and his hands were inconsistent. Doesn’t create either after the catch or as a route runner (gets open by offensive design). Has a real chance (should be a good test athlete), but needs a great deal of development in his individual routes. Strong late round draft consideration (6 -7)..

34 4 Smith Tajiddin Syracuse U WR 6003v 187v 4.63v F

Bakersfield JC transfer. Is a great kid who has overcome a great deal in his life. Has graduated but will not return for a 6th year. Is smart, has good speed and ran good routes, but his hands were just adequate (Didn’t make any wow catches). Faster then combine timed speed. Going to have to make it as your 4th or 5th receiver since he does not play or have potential to play on teams. 6th to 7th round draft consideration.

35 11 Caddell Matt Alabama U WR 5103v 185v 4.42v G

I was really impressed with this players hands, body control and overall body dexterity (made some very good off target adjustments in games viewed). Smooth route runner who can track and adjust to the ball. Has speed (sneaky fast), but lacks the juice to consistently separate vertically from defenders. Will contribute within the running game. Round 6 – 7

36 1 Garcon Pierre Mount Union College WR 5117v 210v 4.44v I

Good looking player from a physical and athletic standpoint. Has been dominant player at this level of competition (D-III), although was very impressive when he lined up on the big stage (post season all star game). Not elusive, but was a strong instinctive runner after the catch. Had some problems coming out of his break on his underneith routes. Need a great deal of position developmental work, but has size and skills. Round 6 – 7.

37 4 Smith Marcus New Mexico U WR 6012v 221v 4.59v F

Former RB who made the transition to a wide receiver position two season’s ago. Is a good looking individual physically (strong) Appeared very stiff as a route runner and although was strong, just doesn’t have the juice. Lacks separation speed on his intermediate and deep route. Has been very productive (91 catches for 1,125) using only about a third of the route tree, but only scored 4 TD’s. Would give late round consideration within the league.

38 1 Grice-Mullen Ryan Hawaii U WR 5100v 187v 4.55v G

Undersized inside receiver with skills but lacks vertical speed to separate vertically from defenders. Has been very productive within their passing game over the past two seasons, but his potential is further eroded by the fact that he is not a returner and due to his lack of size is not likely to factor as a special team’s player. Caught an amazing 237 passes and 36 TD’s over a three year career. Has a chance of being drafted, but is more likely a free agent

39 16 Arrington Adrian Michigan U WR 6027v 203v 4.57v F

Solid complimentary receiver. Has good athletic ability and size, but didn’t show the necessary speed to separate vertically and was unremarkable after the catch. If he can effectively play on teams, has a chance to make it as a 4th or 5th receiver. Worked away from the ball and ran pretty fair routes but there was nothing special in this players game. Would give late round consideration based on his size and moderate play production.

40 7 Bess Davone Hawaii U WR 5097v 194v 4.76v F

Highly productive inside receiver with good hands and after the catch run instincts . Has essentially turned his life around over the past three years after some juvenile problems. Has very good zone awareness and the ability to convert. Works back to the ball and was a dangerous runner after the catch. Does not run well on a clock, but plays fast. Sure handed effecient punt return man. Workout numbers were not impressive, but this guy is a football player.

41 84 Rivers Jason Hawaii U WR 6012v 200v 4.62v F

Not very tough nor was he very physical. Will drop in traffic and didn’t work inside the numbers with a lot of confidence. Would question his speed and deep separation skills. Said to be immature and mouthy, but is not considered a thug. Has good size and was effective in the short zones. Has late late round league draft potential but is more likely a priority free agent.

42 6 Robinson Kevin Utah St WR 5116v 196v 4.67v F

Has been an outstanding return man throughout his collegiate career. Is a play maker who can make things happen after the catch, but lacks the speed and surprisingly neither a polished route runner and or catcher.. I felt he got in and out of a route effectively, with adequate tracking skills. On deep routes, lacks the burst at the top of the route (didn’t separate vertically). Has a chance basically on the strength of his returns.

43 5 Raymond Paul Brown U WR 5091v 176v 4.39v G

Undersized raw talent with impressive tools, but at the outset is a very long way from playing at the professional level. Has the speed to flat out run away from people at this level., but routes were not precise or polished. A fast twitch athlete who was explosive on his take off from (open release). Not as productive as I would have expected and is acutely undersized. Kick returner background is a plus. Late potential, but is more likely priority FA

48 Carter Xavier LSU WR 6014e 180e 4.30e I

Left Squad prior to the start of the 2006 season to run in the pro track circuit.. Rare speed (might well be the fastest man in the world), has a powerful loping stride and eats up ground very quickly. Has a good frame (tight muscular body), adequate hands and very good athletic ability. Was an outstanding prep football player. Home run threat and an effective KOR man as a frosh and soph. Not natural stemmng a route. Probable Olympic team, but can’t overlook.

49 1 Schilens Chez San Diego St WR 6037v 208v 4.39v I

2007 season was slowed with a stress fracture to his right foot. Has rare size and straight speed. Wide catching radius. Played in only 8 games in 07 and caught 22 of his 35 passes in the final three games of the season. Does not play as fast as his timed speed. Long strider who was just adequate in and out of a break. Top rated prep baseball player (Tigers # 34 in 2003). Has too much size and speed to ignore. Late round or priority free agent consideration.

44 7 Urrutia Mario Louisville U WR 6053v 232v 4.63v F

Other then his physical stature, I didn’t see much that I liked about this player’s game. Drops far too many catch able balls, wasn’t tough inside, was a very stiff route runner, and lacks the speed to separate on vertical routes. Wasn’t a confident catcher and showed little in the way of route quickness. Somebody is going to draft this player, but I don’t see much that I liked about this player’s game.

45 8 Jenkins Darnell Miami U WR 5092v 187v 4.68v F

Good athletes with quickness, body control, and eye-hand coordination. Was disappointed with his overall speed, but I liked his play making ability. Has battled injuries throughout his playing career and is not as polished as one would expect coming from this program. Not special run instincts after the catch, but has made some big plays in 07. Late round or priority FA consideration.

46 12 Arthur Jabari Akron U WR 6033v 225v 4.65e F

A big Canadian, who was originally recruited to play quarterback. Catches everything thrown in his direction. A pure possession receive who worked effectively in the under zonesr. Is tall with long limbs and big hands, but is just not very fast. Can’t separate vertically but was surprisingly an impressive runner after the catch (broke secured tackles and showed some awareness in the open field). Draft consideration round # 7.

47 81 Fagg De’Cody Florida St WR 6012v 211v 4.66v F

Was injured at the 2008 combine (leg fx) which might well require him to miss the 2008 season. Has size and although not a natural catcher, I thought he did a good job of adjusting on or off his body. Tendency to round things off underneith. Not fast but can close the cushion on his open releases. Tracks the ball well on vertical routes. Built like a RB. Was effected by his teams lack of a consistentcy at QB, Late draft prior to injury. Not likely to be drafted

87 McIntosh Nicolas College of the Sequoias WR 6010e 185e 4.30e

Might well be the second fastest prep player in Florida history. State 100 and 200 meter champion. Signed with the U of Florida but did not qualify. Attended Dodge City CC (red shirted in 2004), before transferring to the College of the Sequoias. Haitian decent. Signed with Toronto of the CFL in 2007

Scouting the 2008 TE’s

Gus — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:32:20 +0000

With the draft just a day away, it is finally time to reveal the scouting reports of the top offensive players in the country and we will start with the TE;s

3 28 Keller Dustin Purdue U TE 6020v 242v 4.59v G

Very impressive athlete who only lacks size to become a top pro TE or H. Runs extremely well, has excellent body control, and hands to catch the ball on or off his person. A legitimate up the seam threat who flashed run instincts to go along with the strength to break secured tackles. Adequate blocker who initially gets into his block, but didn’t finish with any consistentcy. Will need to improve his overall functional play strength. Late 1 top of 2nd consideration.

1 83 Davis Fred USC TE 6030v 255v 4.73v G

Outstanding prep wide receiver (10.8 100M). Is still in many ways a work in progres who has not come near his potential as a player.Good initial quickness on his get off. Got in and out of a break on his under routes while posing an up the seam threat. Improving as a blocker although needs to finish with far more consistentcy. Not there yet, but in time will give a club the best two way potential in this year’s draft. Possible 1st top of 2nd consideration.

2 13 Bennett Martellus Texas A&M TE 6061v 259v 4.69v I

Has a great body and potentially is one talented football player. A physical player at the point of attack with very good body control particularly for a big man. Is much improved as a receiver. Had some concentration drops, but I like catching radius and his ability to win in traffic. Far more physical then I had originally expected. Can drop his weight and get in and out of a route effectively. Is young and said to be a “me guy” who will need to mature. Round 1 consideration.

4 89 Carlson John Notre Dame TE 6051v 251v 4.89v F

Big, smart, athletic, experienced, instinctive football player. Felt he caught the ball well in the under zones although in not a true seam threat (lacks foot speed). Not really nifty after the catch, but did show some body strength, got north-south and worked to finish. Inline was an adequate blocker who came off flat backed, hit on the rise and stayed with his blocks. A solid back up early who could in time develop into a solid regular. Round # 3 draft consideration

5 82 Stevens Craig California U TE 6032v 254v 4.63v I

An impressive ball player. Has a good frame to add bulk and strength, runs well and is very solid athlete. I felt he had wide receiver type hands and the quickness and speed to threaten up the seam. As a blocker, wasn’t either punishing or a big finisher, but was smart and efficient. Positions after contact (brings his feet around) and stays with blocks. Very good feet and balance. Solid H back prospect who should factor in the mid rounds (4th to 5th).

6 80 Cottam Brad Tennessee U TE 6074v 270v 4.74v I

Injured for most of the 2007 season. Is extremely tall with long limbs and big hands. The best area of his game was without question in the passing game. Has very good hands, a wide receiving radius and was extremely difficut to stop in the under zones. Used his body to shield defenders from the football. Will have a difficult time functioning as a blocker at the pro level (high center of gravity – can’t leverage the point). Second day draft consideration

7 82 Rucker Martin Missouri U TE 6047v 251v 4.71v I

A late bloomer who is a one dimentional TE prospect. Catches well and was a strong runner after the catch. Money in the bank in the under zones. Lacks the true speed to pose an up the seam threat. Is neither as quick or fast as I originally expected and lacks the essential core strength necessary to contribute at the point of attack. Played too high and got little or no movement. Needs to fit into your offensive scheme. Rd 3-4 draft consideration.

8 80 Freeman-Davis Kellen Michigan St TE 6064v 262v 4.64v E

Has size and flashed catching skills. Has the ability to run down the seam, but I felt he was stiff and didn’t get in and out of his under routes especially well. Can’t and didn’t appear to have much “want to” blocking inline. Dropped too many balls in critical situations. A classic underachiever (should dominate in all aspects, but didn’t). High maintenance. Mid round consideration. Draft consideration rounds 4 – 5.

9 18 Tamme Jacob Kentucky U TE 6034v 236v 4.59v G

In the right system could become a very effective player. Can run (straight line), catch and advance the ball. Good to find and settle in the zone hole. Outstanding ball skills. Smart player with great intangibles. Poses a vertical up the seam threat. Disappointing in traffic. Ineffective contributor within the running game (marginal blocker). Too stiff to play WR and not stout enough for TE. Draft consideration 4 – 5.

10 82 Barnidge Gary Louisville U TE 6055v 243v 4.65v J

Has physical limitations; isn’t big by today’s standards, was stiff & mechanical in his movement and doesn’t have good play strength, but none the less is a very under rated ball player. Is smart, showed good route awareness, was tough, competitive, caught and advanced the ball up the field after the catch is going to have to improve his block skills, but should fill the role of a steady back-up TE within the league. 4 – 5 draft consideration

11 16 Finley Jermichael Texas U TE 6042v 243v 4.85v J

Was injured for much of the 2007 season. Has rare size and a huge receiving radius and although realize he has a tremendous amount of playing potential, but I thought he lacked concentration and consistency. Tracks the ball extremely well. I particularly liked the way he adjusted to the deep ball. Very awkward getting into a lateral break (plants his heels). Still too many unknowns to consider this player in either of the first day

12 19 Finley Joe Jon Oklahoma U TE 6062v 254v 4.95v F

A former prep quarterback with good hands and intelligence. Was effective in the under zones, but was not what I would consider an up the seam threat. Along the line of scrimmage is a try hard guy, but doesn’t have the leg strength and power to either sustain and or finish (does work at it) If he matures physically, I see him as factoring as a second or third tight end and special teams contributor. Has 5th to 7th round draft potential.

13 14 Strong Darrell Pittsburgh U TE 6040v 268v 4.83v I

Has had some off the field and dedication issues. Prep quarterback and WR. Has excellent size for the position to go along with solid athletic skills, but has never been a fulltime regular at the position. Much improved in 2007 as a blocker and impressed me with his Hula Bowl receiving ability. In the passing game, I felt he needed room to be effective (didn’t see him win a contested battle for the football). See him as a solid back up at the professional level. Rounds 6-7.

14 80 Haynos Joey Maryland U TE 6075v 266v 4.92v F

Has a basketball background. Good athlete who caught the ball well in the under zones. Can reach and extend for the ball . Wasn’t flashy or insitinctive, but turned it up and advanced the ball. Not a power player (may well be too tall). Has a very high center of gravity which made it difficult for him to leverage people inline. Not a washout, but will have to play in the right system in order to have any successful. Mid second day consideration (6th to 7th).

Scouting the Offensive Tackles of 2008

Gus — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:07:32 +0000

This is probably the most glamorous position on the offensive line, especially when we are talking about the left tackle. Of course Jake Long is at the top of this category and that is why he already has a deal in place with the Miami Dolphins to be the first pick on Saturday and he will be receiving $30 million in guaranteed money!!

Here are the rest of the tackles for this year:

1 77 Long Jake Michigan U OT 6070v 313v 5.25v I

Massive, smart and nasty. Comes off the ball, hit on the rise. took good angles, fit on blocks, sustained well and finished consistently. Doesn’t have LOT feet, but is a force who should play a very long time on the right side. I particularly liked his game in and game out consistency. Once he got his hands on people was very difficult to shed. Plays on his feet and was very aware. How quickly do you draft a right offensive tackle? Draft consideration Round 1

2 74 Williams Chris Vanderbilt U OT 6061v 315v 5.15v I

An athletic big man with quickness, body control, flexibility and balance. Smart player who comes off the ball, hits up and turns defender. Good power and finishing skills. Outstanding playing range and ability to adjust on the move at the second level. Not a great finisher but dominated none the less. Outstanding balance points, knee, and ankle bend.. Can control with punch. Outstanding ability to ride defender past the pocket. Round # 1 sure thing.

3 76 Otah Jeff Pittsburgh U OT 6060v 322v 5.57v I

Not a natural knee bender, but was a massive person, who used his hands well, sustained blocks, played on his feet and finished people inline. I liked the way he rolled into his sets and the way he moved his feet for a big man. On pass pro, I thought his sets were efficient and consistent. Good hand placement. Can come off the ball and maul people inline. Still developing but has real solid playing skills. Top round draft consideration

4 79 Clady Ryan Boise St OT 6061v 309v 5.24v I

Has outstanding feet, balance, and body control. Came off the ball with good pad level, hit on the rise with good hand placement. On pass protection, I felt his sets were efficient. Good depth on his kick step and slide. Did overplay and open outside shoulder some, but I liked his balance points and his ability to replaces hands. Has left tackle playing potential. Top round draft consideration.

5 79 Baker Sam USC OT 6045v 309v 5.52v I

Is smart, experienced and was a steady performer. Was impressed with some of the things he did on pass pro (hand placement). Has good feet, but was more of a finesse guy then a power player. Big man with short arms. Was not totally out of his element on the left side, but he had a tendency to open his outside shoulder up too quickly giving a defender an easy inside counter option. Played much of 07 with a hamstring injury. Round 1 - 2

6 77 Nicks Carl Nebraska U OT 6047v 341v 5.25v E

Big powerful athlete with feet and range (plays angry). Physical player who hits on the rise and finishes inline (best run blocker I’ve seen in 07). Excellent punching power. Showed the skills to work to the 2nd level and reach the playside backer. Said to have questionable work habit, is 25 years of age, and does not process things quickly. Needs more overall consistency, but has all of the tools one looks for at either tackle position. Early 2nd round potential.

7 77 Cherilus Gosder Boston College OT 6063v 314v 5.14v I

Minor off field incident needs to be addressed. Big athletic guy with good feet, balance and body quickness. Worked almost exclusively from a 2 point stance. Will come off the ball and strike, but overall wasn’t a big finisher. Was disappointed in his playing awareness (stunts, blitz pick ups and awareness at the second level). Has some nasty in him and looks like superman, but something (playing awareness) appears to be missing. Round # 2 consideration.

8 78 Collins Anthony Kansas U OT 6050v 317v 5.49v E

Lots of talent (LOT athletic) but is immature and an underachiever. Huge person with a long wing span, yet wasn’t explosive. Can make it look easy (almost appeared disinterested), but also was sloppy with is technique (hand use, crosses his feet). Can dominate at the LOS, has range and sustain blocks. Has a very high ceiling, but well could be a nightmare for the club that selects him. Wouldn’t consider at 1, but at the mid point of 2 might look like a prom queen.

9 54 Keith Brandon Northern Iowa U OT 6052v 345v 5.01v E

Outstanding physical skills and a pro body (long arms and thick all over), but is just not very tough nor was he physical in his play. Very talented athlete with every conceivable physical gift, but should have been far more dominent in his overall play. Loved his feet, can pull, lead, and adjust on the move, but he just wasn’t a consistent finisher. Needs to drop some body weight and improve stamina. Round 4 – 5 consideration

10 79 Hills Tony Texas U OT 6051v 309v 5.20e

Top prep tight end prospects in the country. Has overcome a great deal (physically) over the last 5 years (drop foot) and broke his ankle vs Texas Tech this past season. Has LOT feet, but also showed a tendency to overset and had a difficult time redirecting in space. A team is going to have to be patient with this player, but he has athletic ability long arms and the ability to bend his knees. Could well in time be a high rewards second day surprise. Round 5 – 7

11 78 Giacomini Breno Louisville U OT 6071v 304vv 5.10v J

Great looking physically. Outstanding prep basketball player. First year regular. Former tight end in their jumbo package. Runs extremely well, is very athletic, has good feet, physical and one nasty SOB on the ball field. Does need a lot of work with position technique, hand placement and most importantly his core strength. Didn’t show good bend on his pass sets, thus limiting his anchor. Has a lot of tools. Round 4 to 5 consideration

12 79 Richardson Barry Clemson U OT 6065v 320v 5.49v E

Athletic big man who flashed excellent body control. (nimble) Light on his feet with good blocing range (can get out to the second level. . On pass protection, has the athletic ability to counter and mirror defensive movement. Has been a regular since his freshman season, but I felt his mechanics were not particularly advanced. Just doesn’t play heavy.and to my way of thinking and not a natural knee bender. Round 4 – 5 , based on his natural gifts

13 77 Dunlap King Auburn U OT 6084v 311v 5.27v I

Has been just an verage worker. Huge frame with long limbs, but was underdeveloped. Showed little in the way of tenacity or toughness. Marginal knee bender and power in his hands (might be too tall). I’m bothered by the fact that he still needs to be pushed on and off field. Would also question his willingness to play through things. Wouldn’t trust on the left ot a left tackle. 5th to 6th round consideration based primarily on his rare size.

14 79 Bell Demetrius Northwestern St (LA) OT 6053v 300v 5.21v F

Recruited to play college basketball. Has only played 3 seasons of football. Former DE who was moved to LOT . 2007 Sub – division All American. Very good athlete, but lack both strength and power in his play. I was impressed with his pass sets, feet, body quickness, and overall playing range, but I wonder if he is strong enough to get push at the next level. Good hand placement. At least two year’s away from being contributing to winning

15 54 Clark Corey Texas A&M OT 6053v 315v 5.33v F

Might want to consider projecting this player down inside. Didn’t like his consistently high pad level when engaging defenders inline, but played on his feet and stayed with his blocks for the most part. Limited striking power. This guy wasn’t pretty, but found a way to fet it done in the end. Would give late round draft consideration within the league (6th to 7th).

16 76 Brown Duane Virginia Tech OT 6041v 314v 4.94v I

A former tight end who started two seasons on the right side before moving to the left side as a senior. Never saw him finish inline (didn’t show playing strength or much in the way of toughness). Really struggled with big people. I did like his feet and body balance on pass protection, but was bull rushed and had problems with his anchor. Not as good as he should be, but has too much athleetic potnetial to throw in the scrap heap. Round 6- 7.

17 77 Polumbus Tyler Colorado U OT 6074v 312v 5.23v F

A big man with short arms. Is a try hard guy, but was limited athletically. Has a particularly high center of gravity. Gets shoulders out over his pads consistently when blocking inline (top heavy). Not a big finisher (legs trail). On the ground too frequently. Marginal body quickness. Is going to have problems blocking on the edge or handling the inside counter.

18 54 Dunbar Franklin Middle Tennessee OT 6046v 327v 5.63v F

A massive, very strong (lower half) prospect who has been a starter at the LOT position for 3 seasons. The only true hardship case in this year’s draft. Is not a nifty, quick footed, dancing bear on the outside and doesn’t have any LOT potential at the next level. Lacks agility, body quickness, balance, bend and footwork. At the outset is going to have a very difficult time when the bullet start to fly (game pace). A solid person but strictly a developmental prospect.

19 72 Fladell Mike Rutgers U OT 6061v 328v 5.40e

Big wide body, who was generally non explosive on contact. Lack balance and body control particularly in space. Hits and goes to the ground. Needs to develop a great deal of body strength, particularly in his legs. Might well have been too tall to play inside at guard (LOG) position. Could develop, but the club that invests in him will have to dedicate a great deal of time to this project. Priority free agent.

20 75 Byrne Mike Delaware U OT 6050v 296v 5.45e

An Experienced competitive player. Has a good frame and size and strength potential. Is an agile big man. Agile big man with adequate playing and blocking range. Showed little in the way of power or explosion inline to get movement and sustain blocks. Falls off too many blocks (doesn’t bring feet) nor does he play heavy. Has some upside, but at this stage is at best a priority free agent.

21 75 Garner Nate Arkansas U OT 6040e 325e 5.60e

Is a big (bad body) guy who came on as a senior (late bloomer). Not a fast twitch athlete, but cam eoff the ball, stayed on his feet and sustained his blocks far more effectively then I had expected. On pass protection, short set effectively and although doesn’t have a whole lot of range showed some potential in this area. More of a mass then explosive hit up through guy. Much improved hand use. Priority free agent prospect.

Scouting the 2008 Offensive Guards

Gus — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:53:56 +0000

Today we are focusing on the big guys that take up all the space in the middle of the field. Being an old QB myself I want to take care of these guys and make sure that they are getting the recognition they deserve. Here is a look at the guards that are coming out of college this year.

1 71 Albert Branden Virginia U OG 6055v 309v 5.20v I

Junior eligible player with excellent size, range and athletic ability. Pass sets were quick and efficient. Good stunt awareness, feet and range. Good knee bender. As a run blocker, engages quickly with good hand placement and sustain. Very impressive on his pull and lead. Can improve his overall body strength, but I saw little else that I didn’t like with this player’s game. Round # 1

2 66 Rachal Chilo USC OG 6050v 315v 5.26v I

Missed some time due to injury in 07. Very physical and strong. Excellent punch and ability to move his feet. Liked his pull and lead skills. Good power in his hands. Excellent finisher. Should become a productive professional very quickly. Hits up and works for position after contact. Good body balance. Adequate to reach playside. Might be a tear away from factoring, but has a good deal of talent. Round # 2

3 75 Cousins O’Niel Texas-El Paso OG 6036v 308v 5.04v I

Impressive Senior Bowl practice effort. Has good inline power and the ability to finish people. Good hand placement and ability to steer and stick on blocks. Reaches effectively and runs his feet on contact. Powerful guy who plays on his feet. On pass pro, his mass and ability to drop his base, enables him to handle the bull rush. Inconsistent with his kick/slide (depth and width). A high ceiling player with natural tools. Round 2 draft potnetial

4 79 Greco John Toledo U OG 6046v 305v 5.26v F

An impressive athlete with good feet and strength, size and athletic ability. Looked natural on the left size, but due to his limited arm length would project this player down inside. Liked his work on pass protection (sets, kick step and striking power). A knee bender with striking power and savvy. Liked his balance points and recovery skills. Under the radar player who has a chance to play a very long time. Smart and aware. Round 2 – 3.

5 75 McGlynn Mike Pittsburgh U OG 6042v 311v 5.41v F

College ROT. Is a big sucker (small hands), who impressed me with his work at OG during Senior Bowl workouts. Strong and efficient in a limited area. Not as nifty or quick as one would want, but was physical, and was an adequate to good finisher. Struggled with the quick edge rusher on the outside (gets his feet crossed some). Some block point balance problem. Solid journeyman prospect. Has solid 3rd to 4th round potential.

6 60 Radovich Drew USC OG 6044v 301v 5.38v F

Versatile player with surprising athletic skills & versatility. Can swing between the tackle and guard positions. Need to improve his overall upper body strength but I like his toughness. More then adequate bend and playing savvy. Comes off the ball & hit up with more then adequate punch. Good hand placement and fits. Efficient short set and extend. See him as a valuable back up at the pro level. Round 3 – 4 draft potential.

7 67 Schuening Roy Oregon St OG 6035v 306v 5.32v F

Is a good technician who was both smart and experienced.. Not as explosive as a run blocker as I expected. Good to short set and mirror. Limited playing range. Some inconsistency in 07. Needs to take better angles and improve efficiency at the second level. Marginal to reach playside. Is never going to be a great one, but has the ability to become a regular in time within the league. Draft round 3 – 4

8 61 Felton Robert Arkansas U OG 6035v 313v 5.54v F

A big thick, bad body guy with good upper body strength and quickness, but had some contact balance problems (on the ground too frequently) Feet had a tendency to stall on contact. Got to second level & was able to hit up turn and wall defender. On pass protection, I liked his setting quicks, feet and movement, although I didn’t he get consistent lockout. Will need to keep his weight under control, but is a smart and versatile player. Round 4 draft consideration

9 74 Barton Kirk Ohio St OG 6043v 310v 5.30e F

Much better suited physically and from an athletic standpoint to play down on the inside. Tough kid with some playing experience. Doesn’t kick butt, but also doesn’t get his butt kicked. Has a tendency to engage with his hands from the outside the defenders frame and doesn’t alway bring his feet with him. Not real effective adjusting to movement off the LOS. On pass pro, anchored well on his short sets. Problems with speed out on the edge. Rd 4 – 5.

10 77 Rinehart Chad Northern Iowa U OG 6051v 320v 5.34v F

Not impressive from a physical standpoint but was technically sound, very tough and understands the game. Would project down inside to a guard position. Has a good understanding of angles and he wasn’t on the ground a great deal. Good to scoop, but wasn’t real effecient at the second level. Is a journeyman player who gives you some versatility and experience. Not a supple easy moving athlete. Solid mid to late second day selection (Rd 5-7).

11 73 Bernadeau Mackenzy Bentley College OG 6041v 304v 5.27v F

An athletic, explosive and tough individua,, who can run and adjust in space. Showed good ball smarts, adjusted well on the move and had some nasty in him. Pass sets, feet and use of hands were impressive given his limited background. Missed last 3 games of the 07 season with an MCL injury. Dominates the competition. Similar to Jahri Evans (Saints) in playing style although might not be his equal as an athlete. Has 4th to 5th round draft potential.

12 55 Thomas Donald Connecticut U OG 6033v 303v 5.06v I

The big question is whether he going to be big enough? Has good upper body strength, but his feet often stalled on contact inline. Tried to muscle people rather then hitting up and working around defender. Tough nasty individual who has an edge about him. On pass pro, was effectively able to anchor once he locked on with his hands. Base has a tendency to get too wide I didn’t like the way his toes turned out. Mid to late round draft potential (4 -6).

13 63 Crummey Andrew Maryland U OG 6045v 301v 5.36v F

Is big, smart & experienced player with knowhow. Comes out of a balanced stance, was adequate on his get off but was not a consistent finisher.. Just not a power player. Feet tended to stall on contact . On pass pro, I didn’t think his feet were quick, played, rigid & didn’t get consistent lock out. Overall, I didn’t see special skills, but I believe he has shown enough good things to make a club in a back up role. Round 6 to 7 consideration.

14 74 Murphy Shawn Utah St OG 6037v 320v 5.21v F

Tough, strong, highly physical and versatile (LOT in 06 – LOG in 07). Son of former Braves baseball great Dale Murphy. J.C. transfer, who is very much a work in progress. Former DE. Comes off the ball showing good balance points. Works to sustain, but was not particularly explosive on contact. Can pull, lead and adjust on the move. On pass pro, is going to needs work on his hand use and set more efficiently. Draft consideration 5th – 7th.

15 59 Scott Walter Kentucky U OG 6032v 298v 4.91v J

Former TE and defensive linemen. First year regular. Good athlete, but did not play particularly strong (can’t move big people inline). Did show some shock on the snap but not a big finisher. I do like his feet, balance and bend, but is just not ready at this time. Late developmental prospect who could pay big dividends. Good smarts and playing intangibles. Draft consideration round # 6 to 7.

16 70 Clark Devin New Mexico U OG 6035v 313v 5.29v F

A mauler who showed the ability to bend his knees. Better suited to play down inside. Can make a club based on ability, but is going to have to become more accountable off the field (need to check some off his off the field incidents). Good pass pro skills (liked his sets and range). A mauler who played with some tenacity. Playing ROT, but is better suited to move down inside (OG). Has a chance to become a good one. Late round consideration.

17 54 Young Eric Tennessee U OG 6035v 310v 5.25e I

First season at the LOT position. Appeared top heavy. Doesn’t play with a lot of power. Comes off the ball well, but doesn’t climb or finish consistently. At the second level or on the backside, was quick to do little. Feet and pass sets were solid, but again doesn’t get lockout and was not strong on his feet. Just does not bend well and lacks power. A waist bender although he covers ground and showed. Finesse rather then he is a power player. Round 6th to 7th.

18 71 Zuttah Jeremy Rutgers U OG 6033v 303v 5.07v I

Good size and lots room to grow with his frame. Outstanding test athlete, but lacked functional playing strength. Played consistently straight legged and was stiff in his hips. A non knee bender in the classic sense. Playing a ROT, but is better suited to play inside. On pass pro, his lack of balance points will always limit this player (gets driven back). Adequate college player with tools, but has a very long way to go. Needs position refinement. Draft # 7

19 53 Gibson Mike California U OG 6034v 305v 5.29v F

Is an athletic big man who appeared more natural on the right side then his current LOT position. Is a versatile player, who although is better suited inside, could lineup in a pinch at the tackle spot. Didn’t see him as having a lot of functional playing strength at this time (legs stall on contact), but appeared to have more then adequate feet and contact balance. Would give late round draft consideration, but is more likely a priority free agent prospect.

20 68 McDuffie Chris Clemson U OG 6041v 330v 5.35e F

Proto type look physically although lacks functional playing strength (gets his pads up consistently). Didn’t consistently come off the ball and lacks rear power to get movement inline. Plays hard but was barely an adequate athlete. All of his success and effectiveness was in a short area. Hate to give up on a big man, but this isn’t a quick fix type player. Late consideration, but is more likely a priority free agent player

21 77 Sosa Pedro Rutgers U OG 6035v 300v 5.35e F

LOT starter, but is far better suited to play down inside (Doesn’t play heavy and lacks the foot quickness to play out on an island). Inline flashed take off quicks, but feet generally stopped on contact. Catch and steer guy who lacked short area explosiveness. On pass pro, is a classic waist bender who will have consistent problems with balance. Not a bad athlete, but has a lot of things that need to be fixed. 7th round or PFA.

22 75 Schwartz Geoffrey Oregon U OG 6061v 332v 5.39v F

An absolute giant!. Has decent footwork and effectiveness in a limited area. Not particularly tough and had real problems with speed people on the edge. If he can front up a defender and get his hands on them has a chance to roster. Missed much of 07 due to injury. Has long snap skills which further enhance his playing chances. Late consideration, but is more likely a free agent player within the league.

Scouting the 2008 Centers

Gus — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:47:24 +0000

No offensive line can be effective without a great center, and here the best ones that are going to be eligible for the draft on Saturday.

1 78 Lichtensteiger Kory Bowling Green OC 6022v 298v 5.28v G

Four year regular. Very good player although not impressive to look at physically (short arms). Good balance and quick feet. Very tough and nasty. Very smart and aware (makes all front calls). Quick to the second level. Shows good knee bend and leverage on his blocks. Struggled with big people on pass protection, but never stopped working. A blue coller player, who plays the game with passion and heart. Has strong second day draft consideration.

2 76 Pollak Mike Arizona St OC 6034v 301v 4.99v I

A good serviceable football player, but I didn’t think he was particularly strong or effective at the point of attack. but going to have some real problem with big people inside. Is smart, experienced took good angles and plays on his feet. On pass pro, looked around well, was a good knee bender and overall athletic skills. Not a nasty individual and is never going to be a big finisher, but has solid play skills and should become a steady swingman inside. Round 4 – 5

3 74 Justice Steve Wake Forest U OC 6033v 290v 5.29v G

Has a pre existent condition which required his parents had to sign a waiver in order to play at Wake each season (no apparent effect in his play). Has athletic ability, experience and intelligence. Good athlete with toughness. Can reach effectively playside. Had problems with big people on his nose. Lacks core strength and rear power. Solid football player who could develop into a steady professional.

4 78 Sullivan John Notre Dame OC 6034v 301v 5.39v F

Disappointed with his play in 2007. Is an experienced hand with intelligence, but was surprisingly not a natural knee bender (extensive wrestling background) and didn’t get consistent fits inline. On pass pro didn’t appear able to drop his base and make a stand vs a power rush. Had some very untimely gun snap errors in 07. Round 5 to 7 draft consideration.

5 70 Wallace Cody Texas A&M OC 6042v 296v 5.31v F

Over achiever. Not a supple athlete, but is tough, experienced and durable. Had problems with people on his nose. Not strong at the point of attack. Just adequate contact balance. Tough, nasty individual. Journeyman player who has the potential to fill in at the OG spot. Problems with the bull rush. If he goes to a club that employs a zone blocking scheme (slide protection) could play a long time. Mid to late second day draft consideration (5 – 6).

6 71 Richard Jameson Buffalo U OC 6046v 297v 5.12v F

A limited athlete, but was tough, strong, and very physical. Gets after people and showed better then expected upper body leverage. Good angles to 2nd level, but was inconsistent to sustain. Will also overplay or miss the target. On pass protection, showed adequate anchor when working against the bull rush. Is going to need some work, but was very pleased with his work throughout the season. Would give 6th to 7th round draft consideration.

7 69 Spanos Matt USC OC 6053v 322v 5.39v F

Stepped into a starting role with an injury this past year and played far better then expected. Is both big and strong, but was not an explosive player. . Walls off effectively and worked well in tandem. Improved with each passing game. Not an especially good athlete but will fight you to the end. Played much of the season with a triceps injury which need to be repaired. Has an outside chance of being drafted, but is more likely a priority free agent within the league.

8 67 Miller Drew Florida U OC 6046v 302v 5.30e F

Doesn’t play big. Lacks functional playing strength and finishing skills. Is smart and plays with savvy, but will have a particularly tough time blocking big people at the next level. On pass protection,I didn’t think he had near enough physical ability to handle a professional defender. Is smart, experienced and has lined up at both OG and the OC position, but lacks the necessary skills to play. Marginal free agent.

9 72 Bujnoch Glen Cincinnati U OC 6046v 285v 5.24v G

Dad (Glen) played with the Bengal’s. Undersized player with limited play strength. Great kid with size potential, experience and good intangibles. I thought he played too rigid. Playing a tackle position, but did work at the center position in the spring and appears physically far better suited to project inside in the professional ranks. Will have get stronger and to do a far better job of keeping his pads down to play the OC position, but has a chance.

1	12	Ryan	Matt	Boston College	QB	6046v	228v	4.95v	I
	Chance to be a very good one. Can make all of the necessary throws Accurate in the short and intermediate zones. Will throw off back foot some, but his forte was throwing the seam passer. Smart player who won’t be overwhelmed. Better from the gun then from under the center. Had some questions about his ability to see the underneath zone, but really liked this players stroke. Playing with a very limited surrounding cast. A one man show. Round # 1.
2	5	Flacco	Joe	Delaware U	QB	6063v	236v	4.86v	I
	Has outstanding size, body strength and an A-1 throwing arm. Was an accurate thrower who didn’t lose his composure in pressure situation. Very poised while posessing solid intangibles. Sorts things out well. Good ball placement on short and intermediate throws. Not a threat to run the ball, but can make time while showing good rush sense. Surprisingly effective throwing on the move. High ceiling player with strong 2nd round draft potential.
3	7	Henne	Chad	Michigan U	QB	6027v	230v	4.95v	I
	Experienced 4 year regular who played injured for much of 07. Has a very strong arm and was tough minded but I thought he was streaky with his accuracy, Throw mechanics need some work, and was marginal to escape, but I liked his overall game. Improved throwing touch and flair control. Was not a threat to run the football but is strong and can make time in the pocket. Played much of the 07 less then 100%. Round 2 draft consideration.
4	12	Brohm	Brian	Louisville U	QB	6027v	230v	4.85v	I
	Productive, experienced system quarterback. Accurate in the under zones and showed a relatively quick arm. Distributes the ball well and can manage the game effectively. Can’t move or get away from the blitz. Lacks a big arm. Marginal on intermediate or the deep ball accruacy. Had problems locating the backside backer on some under throws. Anoher in a long line of overrated Louisville QB’s. Back up playing potential. Mid to late second round consideration
5	10	Booty	John David	USC	QB	6023v	218v	4.93v	F
	Does nothing to get you real excited as a player, but is an efficient serviceable quarterback. Has an adequate throwing arm, was an accurate short and intermediate passer. Can throw effectively on the move. Good decision maker who is getting the most out of his ability. Football smart. I would today view him as a back up player within the league who when called upon could potentially contribute. 3th to 4th round draft potential.
6	3	Woodson	Andre	Kentucky U	QB	6040v	229v	4.86v	I
	Long deliberate throwing delivery. Didn’t sense the rush especially well and took too many sacks. Awkward touch passer and throwing on the move. Marginal deep passer. Good looking physically (strong and proportioned). System passer. More questions then answers; Read entire field? Process? Put ball in tight windows? Round 4 – 5 consideration
7	10	Brink	Alex	Washington St	QB	6022v	211v	5.02v	F
	Four year regular. Improved throwing release and delivery. Highly intelligent and experienced player. Needs work on his deep ball, but overall was both productive and efficient. Accurate passer in the under zones who was poised and made good throwing decisions. Improved throwing delivery and release point. Can throw from awkward positions and on the move. A whole lot better then I had expected. Late round (6 – 7) draft consideration
8	14	Morris	Bernard	Marshall U	QB	6030v	223v	4.76v	I
	Had 1 off field incident which might come into play. Biggest surprise of 2007. Top athlete, who can make time in the pocket, escape and spin the ball . Has a very live arm & although he had things he will need to improve (locks on his primary, will flush quickly and work receivers) I loved how he delivered the ball. Can stick it into a tight seam. Streaky with his accruacy. Has the tools to be something special down the line. Consider rounds 4.- 5
9	10	Ainge	Erik	Tennessee U	QB	6054v	225v	5.04v	F
	Is a big athlete good looking player a great deal of playing experience, but I was extremely disappointed in his arm strength, throwing accruacy (particularly deep) and decision making skills. Has an over the top throwing delivery but does not throw a tight ball. Was neither quick or highly mobile in the pocket. or as a runner. Didn’t see much in the way of creativity or instincts particularly when you consider his playing background. Round 6 – 7
10	14	Morelli	Anthony	Penn St	QB	6035v	231v	5.09v	F
	Has all the tools you look for in a QB; an athletic body, very strong throwing arm & far better movement then I had expected, but is acutely under coached & unprepared for the job of being a professional QB. Has a violent over hand delivery & when he’s on his game has as much ability as anyone in the draft. Can make all the throws; out, dig, fade and comeback, Going to have to start from square 1 with this player, but has a big upside. A 6th – 7th round steal.
11	15	Brennan	Colt	Hawaii U	QB	6023v	207v	4.95e	F
	System QB who has at best an adequate throwing arm and a very funky throwing delivery. Deep arm was highly questionable. Marginal ability to get away from pressure.Accurate and efficient on the underneath stuff. Is tough minded and showed good instincts. Has put up some unbelieveable throwing numbers, but his poor performance at the Senior Bowl and vs San Jose can also not be overlooked. Would give 6th to 7th round draft consideration.
12	7	O’Connell	Kevin	San Diego St	QB	6051v	223v	4.64v	I
	Athletic big man. Has a big arm but was inconsistent with his accuracy and ball placement. Has come a long way in the past season, but I still feel he has a very long way to come. Has impressive movement for a big man and threw adequately on the move. Led State in rushing in 2007. Has a chance. Late round draft (7) or priority free agent consideration.
13	11	Johnson	Joshua	U of San Diego	QB	6026v	213v	4.55v	I
	Is a good looking athlete who put up some very impressive numbers at a very low level of competition. Moves around well in the pocket showing both mobility and running skills. Don’t think he was a quick decision maker, but also didn’t put the football in harm’s way too often. Very effecient at a low level of play. Put up some very impressive numbers, but I don’t like his arm and will needs a great deal of work with his mechanics. Rd. # 7 or PFA
14	13	Ostrander	T.C.	Stanford U	QB	6021v	227v	5.00e	F
	Has a quick arm and was an effective passer underneath. Overall arm strength was at best adequate and I didn’t see much in the way of mobility or pocket presence. Felt he competed hard and made good decisions, but overall has just an outside chance of factoring at the pro level. Struggled some with the deep ball. Streaks of inaccuracy. Durability concerns. Has a chance to be a third, but really don’t see special skills with this player. 7th or priority free agent.
15	9	Keller	Sam	Nebraska U	QB	6035v	241v	5.03v	F
	Senior transfer with size and a strong arm, but doesn’t have the movement, quickness and or feet to play beyond this level of play. Streaky with accuracy and I would have to question his overall decision making skills. Good physical stature. Started quickly but appeared to regress as the season progressed. Doesn’t appear to know where people were on the field. A check down guy. Free agent with just an outside chance to factor.
16	8	Roach	Brad	Catawba	QB	6056v	250v	5.18v
	Has a strong arm and a quicker and more mobile then I originally expected. Is a three year regular. Is a three year regular with a quick compact throwing delivery. Showed adequate throwing accuracy (will work receivers some). Needs to use his lower half better. Marginal run skills, but showed the ability to aviod and make time in the pocket. Has little in the way of a surrounding cast. Possible late round selection, but more likely a priority free agent.
17	12	Smith	Paul	Tulsa U	QB	6012v	208v	4.97v
	Smith is a heady performer with good playing intangables. Is smart, aware and was an accurate thrower in the underneith zones. Got the ball out quickly always (cocked to throw), can look off defenders and made good throwing decisions. Has a barely adequate arm and was not imposing physically. Functional, but doesn’t have starting potential in my estimation. Possible late draft, but more likely a free agent. Possible third or practice squad performer.
18	2	Santos	Ricky	New Hampshire U	QB	6011v	215v	5.03v
	Very smart, experienced, productive and efficient. Prepares himseld well. Instinctive school yard type player in the Doug Flutie type mold. A four year regular who has put up some very impressive numbers during his college playing career. Was an accurate thrower who distributed the football well. Good anticipation ability to make plays. Appears shorter then then his listed height. Wouldn’t bet against him making it, but isn’t exactly what you are looking for.
19	3	Wright	Kyle	Miami U	QB	6033v	218v	4.90v
	Big good looking athlete who has been given every opportunity to succeed, but has never done it over the long haul. Has a strong arm and tools you look for, but is not an accurate passer nor did he make consistently good throwing decisions. Didn’t think he consistently threw the football on time and in all games viewed, really worked the receivers. I have to believe that the pro game is going to be just too fast for this player. Priority free agent.
20	15	Flynn	Matt	LSU	QB	6022v	231v	4.81v
	Has too many things to fix with this player’s throwing mechanics. Not an accurate passer on intermediate and deep throws. Barely adequate arm strength his ball appeared to have little life coming out of his hand. Didn’t look off defenser (stares down primary) dellivery quickness. Mobility and pocket presense were marginal. Did show both toughness and made some plays at critical times during the 07 season, but I see him as having just marginal play potential.
21	17	Hill	Nick	Southern Illinois U	QB	6025v	216v	4.85v
	Western Kentucky transfer. Left hand QB with better then expected athletic ability (former basketball player) Liked his size and the ability to make time with his feet. Made good throwing deceisons underneith. Didn’t like his throwing mechanics (very deliberate throwing stroke) and his arm was just adequate. Lots of things to fix (poor footwork), but has size and put up some impressive numbers. Free agent with practice squad potential
22	1	Lee	Xavier	Florida St	QB	6030v	233v	4.88v
	Top prep QB recruit with size and a very strong arm. Can get the ball out quickly when he sees things down the field. Can throw on the move and had adequate throwing accuracy. Is just not a quick processor and has been very inconsistent over his entire college playing career.. Has a strong athletic body and moved around surprisingly well, but the professional game is going to be just too fast for this individual. Developmental potential only. Game too fast.
23	10	Dixon	Dennis	Oregon U	QB	6032v	195v	4.60e
	Very thin and lacks the throwing mechanics you look for in a pro QB prospect. Has an adequate arm, but showed little touch and his mechanics were poor.. More of a dart thrower then a pure passer. Improved decision maker in 07, and really took to the new playing system,but in the end there are still far too many things to be fixed. Had a late season injury (Lt Knee ACL) and is also in the Atlanta Braves farm system. Wouldn’t consider with my club.
24	12	Mitchell	Blake	So Carolina U	QB	6026v	219v	4.95e
	Was a highly recruited prep player who did not come close to playing to his full playing potential at the college level. Has size, a good throwing arm snd more then adequate movement in the pocket. Was disappointed in his throwing accruacy and decision making. Showed a tendency to hold the football, but mechanically can get the ball out quickly. Has had some off the field problems and I would question his dependability. Too inconsistent in his play
25	15	O’Hara	Ryan	Central Oklahoma U	QB	6060e	230e
	Arizona and Scottsdale CC transfer. Has rare size and better throwing skills them I ex[ected. Good athlete also lettered in basketball at Arizona. Top prep QB prospect. Needs some help with his footwork, but his delivery was short and quick. Poor sourounding cast and injury limited his playing production in 2007 (6 TD’s and 13 Int) but I liked the way he spun the football. Going to have to work on ball placement and deep accruacy. Not a washout.

1	5	McFadden	Darren	Arkansas U	RB	6012v	211v	4.36v	D
	Best back to enter the draft in the past two decades. Is a big back who showed excellent quicks, moves in the hole and the speed to run away from folks. Breaks secured tackles and finishes. Good backside vision, excellent hands and was extremely dangerous in space. Runs tall, but can create and finish. A slasher, who can put his foot in the ground and go. Best football player in the country. My first player off the board. A young Eric Dickerson.
2	5	Mendenhall	Rashard	Illinois U	RB	5101v	225v	4.45v	I
	This guy does a lot of things that impact a football game. Has size, outstanding take off quickness and the speed to take it to the house. Instinctive runner who has the speed to get the corner and the gear changes to run away from second and third level defenders. Can create in space and was an exceptional receiver out of the backfield. Should impact quickly. Round # 1 draft consideration. 262 1,681 – 6.4 -17 TD’s in 2007.
3	5	Johnson	Chris	East Carolina U	RB	5110v	197v	4.29v	I
	Has outstanding speed & run instincts. Tougher then expected inside.. As a receiver will line up in the slot, motion across the formation and come out of the backfield, but proved to be a real threat to take it to the house. Impressive hands.Dangerous return man who hit the seam and goes. Not as patient inside as he should be but ran hard. Not a big man by today’s standards, was a marginal blocker and not big tackle breaker, but is without question the real deal.
4	25	Charles	Jamaal	Texas U	RB	5110v	200v	4.41v	I
	A one cut guy with vision, good balance, top speed and a great burst. I liked the way he hit the hole, bounced it and got the corner and out ran second and third level defenders. Was not a big finisher inside (just wasn’t very strong on contact and put the football on the ground far to0 frequently). Still developing (not a every down player at this time), but I really liked what I saw in this players game. Has run 10.26/100m. Draft # 1
5	25	Jones	Felix	Arkansas U	RB	5101v	207v	4.49v	I
	Exciting zone runner with the speed to get the corner & outrun the pursuit angle. Is sudden with vision & ability to plant and go. Shows multiple cutting skills, good hands and was dangerous in space. Has bouncy legs and the ability break secured tackles. Not a lot of thread off the tires having been a back up throughout his entire career. Whether he can carry the full load & become feature back in the NFL is still an unknown, but I like what I’ve seen to this point.
6	28	Stewart	Jonathan	Oregon U	RB	5102v	235v	4.48v	I
	Big productive between the tackles runner who broke secured tackles and finished his runs. Liked his ability to get up in the hole, bounce it outside or see the backside cutbacks. Appeared a little stiff and didn’t run with the type of speed he showed at the scouting combine. Runs hard. Has good pad level and finishes his runs consistently. An 80-20 catcher on flat, circle, screen and arrow routes. Late 1st or top of the second draft potneital.
7	25	Forte	Matt	Tulane U	RB	6013v	217v	4.47v	I
	This is a highly productive (361 – 2127 – 5.9 – 23), between the tackles runner that moves the pile and breaks secured tackles. Not nifty or elusive but gets north-south quickly and finishes everything. Can catch and advance the ball. Doesn’t have break away speed, but at games end did a lot of positive things. Appears to thrive on work. Excellent red zone runner.
8	24	Smith	Kevin	Central Florida U	RB	6011v	217v	4.51v	F
	Has good vision, balance, and lower body surge. Can breaks secured tackles and finishes. Is not an elusive runner but is a strong legged runner with the speed to run away from 2nd and 3rd level people. Has a low center of gravity and showed the ability to hit a point and go. Marginal down the field receiver.. (struggles to catch) Under rated and appreciated player. Not flashy, but does a lot of positive things during the course of a game. Rd 3 consideration.
9	27	Rice	Ray	Rutgers U	RB	5080v	199v	4.47v	G
	Has excellent take off quicks to press the LOS, moves in the hole, very good vision and the speed to take it to the house. Hard nosed kid who finished his runs inside. Highly competitive player. Good but not exceptional receiver (screen, flat, and arrow route type hands). Is short in stature and as an “I” back little is known about his run or pass blocking skills. Should impack quickly as a change of pace, all purpose back, but does he have the stuff to be a front line player. Round 3
10	22	Hightower	Tim	Richmond U	RB	6000v	223v	4.59v	F
	Led the nation sub division in rushing on 2007 (327-1924-5.9-20). A zone runner who posesses good initial quickness to press the line of scrimmage. Showed moves in the hole and once he broke the LOS exhibited multiple cutting skills in the open area. A strong runner who who can break secured tackles and finishes.Fine receiver who caught and adjusted to the football well. Has never fumbled in over 700 carries during his college career. Round 4 – 5
11	10	Slaton	Steve	West Virginia U	RB	5091v	197v	4.49v	G
	A patient runner with suttle moves, who showed the ability to read blocks and react (very good feel). Quicker then fast, although has the speed to get the corner. Liked his ability to see the backside cutback. Confident catcher who can adjust catch the ball down the field. Not as elusive as expected (more of a 1 cut and go guy, but judges distances well. Production has declined over the last 3 season which is a concern, but is a steady dependable back. Rd # 3
12	22	Choice	Tashard	Georgia Tech	RB	5104v	215v	4.51v	G
	Earns every yard he gets. Quicker then fast. Good run instincts, hands and run pass routes. Not a home run guy but gets tough yards between the tackles. Lacks top speed to create daylight and beat the angle. Has puts the ball on the ground some and was never 100% during the 07 season. Was a willing but not effective blocker. Very strong lower torso. Transfer from the U of Oklahoma where he backed up Adrian Peterson. Has 4th round draft potential.
13	23	Washington	Chancey	USC	RB	5113v	211v	4.44v	F
	Not as physical a back as I would have expect given his physical make up. More of a dancer then power back. Ran the hole, but his feet tend to stop on contact. Adequate catch and run after skills. Has solid back up and special teams potential. Good cutback skills and vision to see the backside. Has plus hands and overall receiving skills. Has had a number of injuries to go along with academic problems. Has mid round draft potential
14	33	Parmele	Jalen	Toledo U	RB	5114v	224v	4.52v	I
	Big strong back who hits it up inside with authority. Can breaks inside tackles and move the pile on the inside. Productive between the tackle runner with more then adequate speed. Good feet, vision, pad level at contact and finish. Fights for yards, and was particularly effective in short yardage and red zone situations. Not a home run hitter nor was he an elusive runner in the open field.
15	20	Hart	Mike	Michigan U	RB	5087v	206v	4.76v	F
	Tough I-back who consistently moved the chains inside. Got north-south runner quickly while showing good physical toughness. Is undersized (short but very thick) and does not have the necessary speed. Has done it at the highest level for his entire career showing natural run instincts. Decision making was questionable. A big concern is his work load (1,015 carries) over a 4 year career. Only so many war in a little man’s body. Second day draft consideration.
16	22	Savage	Dantrell	Oklahoma St	RB	5082v	187v	4.51v	F
	Juco guy who has come a very long way. Change of pace back who hit the hole quickly, showing both balance, feet, very good run instincts. Showed multiple cutting skills and a spin move that can freeze a defender. Talented player, but is a little guy who is not going to have the physical stature for fulltime play. Has been injured in each of the past two seasons.. Caught well in the under zone. Not a complete player, but should factor as a 3rd down back
20	32	Simpson	Chad	Morgan St	RB	5085v	216v	4.44v	G
	South Florida transfer who had a very productive year in his only season of play at Morgan. Is a strong inside runner with quickness, quick feet, instincts, balance and speed. Is strong legged and broke many secured tackles at this level. Tough inside but also showed creativity in space. Not featured in their offense as a pass receiver.& was not used on returns (feature back). Has the run skills, but would like to have seen him catch, block and or return. Rd 6-7
18	3	Boyd	Cory	So Carolina U	RB	6004v	213v	4.57v	F
	Has good vision and feel running inside the tackles. Was patient, read blocks well and finished his runs. Doesn’t have top speed/explosion, wasn’t an elusive nor was he a tackle breaker. Lacks the speed to consistently get the corner. Did catch the ball well on screens arrow and swing routes.Just a good college back but didn’t do anything to set him apart from the rest of the pack. Back-up special team type player. Draft consideration; round 6 – 7.
19	23	Patrick	Allan	Oklahoma U	RB	6006v	198v	4.58v	G
	Did not play well in his first year as a starter. Not a natural instinctive runner. Is a tough guy who ran hard inside, but appeared to run with blinders on (no vision). Doesn’t run with much in the way of instincts. Best area of his game appears to be his efforts on speial teams (effective gunner). Overall, I liked this player toughness and versatility, but his lack of instincts concerns me greatly. Would give some late round consideration.
17	26	Torain	Ryan	Arizona St	RB	6003v	222v	4.59v	F
	Tough inside runner who move the chain inside. I felt he made good decisions. A slasher who judges distances well. Not particularly fast nor was he an elusive runner. Said to have good football smarts and instincts. Runs hard, showed balance, breaks tackles and secured the football. Needs to keep his pads down more consistently. Has had a history of injuries over his career. A good college back but not a difference maker. Draft consideration; rds 6 – 7.
21	20	Brown	Thomas	Georgia U	RB	5083v	204v	4.55v	G
	Tough feisty little all purpose back who plays extremely hard. Runs the hole, but was essentially a straight line runner. compact (pro style runner – plant and go). Good finisher. A proto-type third down back, but I didn’t think he ran good routes and his hand appeared barely adequate. Style of play will likely shorten his career. You have to like him, but realistically, what do you do with him. Late round draft potential, but is more likely a priority free agent.
22	6	Green-Ellis	BenJarvus	Mississippi U	RB	5105v	219v	4.66v	F
	A serviceable athlete, who rushed for a thousand plus yards since transferring from Indiana. North -south runner who showed balance and run vision. Showed some inside running strength and the ability move the pile. Once he broke the scrimmage line, I didn’t see either the burst or creativity in the open field. Inconsistent to get to the corner. Limited exposure within the passing game (10 catches in two seasons). No special skills. Late consideration.
24	22	Little	Rafael	Kentucky U	RB	5086v	194v	4.50e	G
	Skilled tough runner with good instincts and vision / Judges distances well / Has talent but is acutely undersized, lacks break away speed and just wasn’t sudden. Injuries (knees) appears to have eroded his playing skills. Adequate hands (check down and screens), but I don’t see him running the wheel. Has a chance of being drafted, but is more likely a priority free agent.
23	6	Lumpkin	Kregg	Georgia U	RB	5114v	226v	4.73v	F
	Smooth runner with good vision. Hits it in there with authority, but has been banged up over the past two seasons and has had very few touches (played with big cast on his thumb early) Started the season in a three man rotation, but his role deminished as the season progressed. Was not a factor in the passing game. Has a pro body and athletic ability, but at this stage is a long shot to make it. Late round potential, but is more likely a priority free agent.
25	42	Korte	Steve	LSU (Ex)	RB	6005v	233v	4.37v
	Big, strong talented back whose career was cut short due to to a series of events including an knee reconstruction academic suspension. Is a big powerful inside runner with limited experience and virtually no playing experience. Explosive player with excellent hands. Good special team’s potential. Son of former Saints star of the same name.

3	28	Keller	Dustin	Purdue U	TE	6020v	242v	4.59v	G
	Very impressive athlete who only lacks size to become a top pro TE or H. Runs extremely well, has excellent body control, and hands to catch the ball on or off his person. A legitimate up the seam threat who flashed run instincts to go along with the strength to break secured tackles. Adequate blocker who initially gets into his block, but didn’t finish with any consistentcy. Will need to improve his overall functional play strength. Late 1 top of 2nd consideration.
1	83	Davis	Fred	USC	TE	6030v	255v	4.73v	G
	Outstanding prep wide receiver (10.8 100M). Is still in many ways a work in progres who has not come near his potential as a player.Good initial quickness on his get off. Got in and out of a break on his under routes while posing an up the seam threat. Improving as a blocker although needs to finish with far more consistentcy. Not there yet, but in time will give a club the best two way potential in this year’s draft. Possible 1st top of 2nd consideration.
2	13	Bennett	Martellus	Texas A&M	TE	6061v	259v	4.69v	I
	Has a great body and potentially is one talented football player. A physical player at the point of attack with very good body control particularly for a big man. Is much improved as a receiver. Had some concentration drops, but I like catching radius and his ability to win in traffic. Far more physical then I had originally expected. Can drop his weight and get in and out of a route effectively. Is young and said to be a “me guy” who will need to mature. Round 1 consideration.
4	89	Carlson	John	Notre Dame	TE	6051v	251v	4.89v	F
	Big, smart, athletic, experienced, instinctive football player. Felt he caught the ball well in the under zones although in not a true seam threat (lacks foot speed). Not really nifty after the catch, but did show some body strength, got north-south and worked to finish. Inline was an adequate blocker who came off flat backed, hit on the rise and stayed with his blocks. A solid back up early who could in time develop into a solid regular. Round # 3 draft consideration
5	82	Stevens	Craig	California U	TE	6032v	254v	4.63v	I
	An impressive ball player. Has a good frame to add bulk and strength, runs well and is very solid athlete. I felt he had wide receiver type hands and the quickness and speed to threaten up the seam. As a blocker, wasn’t either punishing or a big finisher, but was smart and efficient. Positions after contact (brings his feet around) and stays with blocks. Very good feet and balance. Solid H back prospect who should factor in the mid rounds (4th to 5th).
6	80	Cottam	Brad	Tennessee U	TE	6074v	270v	4.74v	I
	Injured for most of the 2007 season. Is extremely tall with long limbs and big hands. The best area of his game was without question in the passing game. Has very good hands, a wide receiving radius and was extremely difficut to stop in the under zones. Used his body to shield defenders from the football. Will have a difficult time functioning as a blocker at the pro level (high center of gravity – can’t leverage the point). Second day draft consideration
7	82	Rucker	Martin	Missouri U	TE	6047v	251v	4.71v	I
	A late bloomer who is a one dimentional TE prospect. Catches well and was a strong runner after the catch. Money in the bank in the under zones. Lacks the true speed to pose an up the seam threat. Is neither as quick or fast as I originally expected and lacks the essential core strength necessary to contribute at the point of attack. Played too high and got little or no movement. Needs to fit into your offensive scheme. Rd 3-4 draft consideration.
8	80	Freeman-Davis	Kellen	Michigan St	TE	6064v	262v	4.64v	E
	Has size and flashed catching skills. Has the ability to run down the seam, but I felt he was stiff and didn’t get in and out of his under routes especially well. Can’t and didn’t appear to have much “want to” blocking inline. Dropped too many balls in critical situations. A classic underachiever (should dominate in all aspects, but didn’t). High maintenance. Mid round consideration. Draft consideration rounds 4 – 5.
9	18	Tamme	Jacob	Kentucky U	TE	6034v	236v	4.59v	G
	In the right system could become a very effective player. Can run (straight line), catch and advance the ball. Good to find and settle in the zone hole. Outstanding ball skills. Smart player with great intangibles. Poses a vertical up the seam threat. Disappointing in traffic. Ineffective contributor within the running game (marginal blocker). Too stiff to play WR and not stout enough for TE. Draft consideration 4 – 5.
10	82	Barnidge	Gary	Louisville U	TE	6055v	243v	4.65v	J
	Has physical limitations; isn’t big by today’s standards, was stiff & mechanical in his movement and doesn’t have good play strength, but none the less is a very under rated ball player. Is smart, showed good route awareness, was tough, competitive, caught and advanced the ball up the field after the catch is going to have to improve his block skills, but should fill the role of a steady back-up TE within the league. 4 – 5 draft consideration
11	16	Finley	Jermichael	Texas U	TE	6042v	243v	4.85v	J
	Was injured for much of the 2007 season. Has rare size and a huge receiving radius and although realize he has a tremendous amount of playing potential, but I thought he lacked concentration and consistency. Tracks the ball extremely well. I particularly liked the way he adjusted to the deep ball. Very awkward getting into a lateral break (plants his heels). Still too many unknowns to consider this player in either of the first day
12	19	Finley	Joe Jon	Oklahoma U	TE	6062v	254v	4.95v	F
	A former prep quarterback with good hands and intelligence. Was effective in the under zones, but was not what I would consider an up the seam threat. Along the line of scrimmage is a try hard guy, but doesn’t have the leg strength and power to either sustain and or finish (does work at it) If he matures physically, I see him as factoring as a second or third tight end and special teams contributor. Has 5th to 7th round draft potential.
13	14	Strong	Darrell	Pittsburgh U	TE	6040v	268v	4.83v	I
	Has had some off the field and dedication issues. Prep quarterback and WR. Has excellent size for the position to go along with solid athletic skills, but has never been a fulltime regular at the position. Much improved in 2007 as a blocker and impressed me with his Hula Bowl receiving ability. In the passing game, I felt he needed room to be effective (didn’t see him win a contested battle for the football). See him as a solid back up at the professional level. Rounds 6-7.
14	80	Haynos	Joey	Maryland U	TE	6075v	266v	4.92v	F
	Has a basketball background. Good athlete who caught the ball well in the under zones. Can reach and extend for the ball . Wasn’t flashy or insitinctive, but turned it up and advanced the ball. Not a power player (may well be too tall). Has a very high center of gravity which made it difficult for him to leverage people inline. Not a washout, but will have to play in the right system in order to have any successful. Mid second day consideration (6th to 7th).

1	77	Long	Jake	Michigan U	OT	6070v	313v	5.25v	I
	Massive, smart and nasty. Comes off the ball, hit on the rise. took good angles, fit on blocks, sustained well and finished consistently. Doesn’t have LOT feet, but is a force who should play a very long time on the right side. I particularly liked his game in and game out consistency. Once he got his hands on people was very difficult to shed. Plays on his feet and was very aware. How quickly do you draft a right offensive tackle? Draft consideration Round 1
2	74	Williams	Chris	Vanderbilt U	OT	6061v	315v	5.15v	I
	An athletic big man with quickness, body control, flexibility and balance. Smart player who comes off the ball, hits up and turns defender. Good power and finishing skills. Outstanding playing range and ability to adjust on the move at the second level. Not a great finisher but dominated none the less. Outstanding balance points, knee, and ankle bend.. Can control with punch. Outstanding ability to ride defender past the pocket. Round # 1 sure thing.
3	76	Otah	Jeff	Pittsburgh U	OT	6060v	322v	5.57v	I
	Not a natural knee bender, but was a massive person, who used his hands well, sustained blocks, played on his feet and finished people inline. I liked the way he rolled into his sets and the way he moved his feet for a big man. On pass pro, I thought his sets were efficient and consistent. Good hand placement. Can come off the ball and maul people inline. Still developing but has real solid playing skills. Top round draft consideration
4	79	Clady	Ryan	Boise St	OT	6061v	309v	5.24v	I
	Has outstanding feet, balance, and body control. Came off the ball with good pad level, hit on the rise with good hand placement. On pass protection, I felt his sets were efficient. Good depth on his kick step and slide. Did overplay and open outside shoulder some, but I liked his balance points and his ability to replaces hands. Has left tackle playing potential. Top round draft consideration.
5	79	Baker	Sam	USC	OT	6045v	309v	5.52v	I
	Is smart, experienced and was a steady performer. Was impressed with some of the things he did on pass pro (hand placement). Has good feet, but was more of a finesse guy then a power player. Big man with short arms. Was not totally out of his element on the left side, but he had a tendency to open his outside shoulder up too quickly giving a defender an easy inside counter option. Played much of 07 with a hamstring injury. Round 1 - 2
6	77	Nicks	Carl	Nebraska U	OT	6047v	341v	5.25v	E
	Big powerful athlete with feet and range (plays angry). Physical player who hits on the rise and finishes inline (best run blocker I’ve seen in 07). Excellent punching power. Showed the skills to work to the 2nd level and reach the playside backer. Said to have questionable work habit, is 25 years of age, and does not process things quickly. Needs more overall consistency, but has all of the tools one looks for at either tackle position. Early 2nd round potential.
7	77	Cherilus	Gosder	Boston College	OT	6063v	314v	5.14v	I
	Minor off field incident needs to be addressed. Big athletic guy with good feet, balance and body quickness. Worked almost exclusively from a 2 point stance. Will come off the ball and strike, but overall wasn’t a big finisher. Was disappointed in his playing awareness (stunts, blitz pick ups and awareness at the second level). Has some nasty in him and looks like superman, but something (playing awareness) appears to be missing. Round # 2 consideration.
8	78	Collins	Anthony	Kansas U	OT	6050v	317v	5.49v	E
	Lots of talent (LOT athletic) but is immature and an underachiever. Huge person with a long wing span, yet wasn’t explosive. Can make it look easy (almost appeared disinterested), but also was sloppy with is technique (hand use, crosses his feet). Can dominate at the LOS, has range and sustain blocks. Has a very high ceiling, but well could be a nightmare for the club that selects him. Wouldn’t consider at 1, but at the mid point of 2 might look like a prom queen.
9	54	Keith	Brandon	Northern Iowa U	OT	6052v	345v	5.01v	E
	Outstanding physical skills and a pro body (long arms and thick all over), but is just not very tough nor was he physical in his play. Very talented athlete with every conceivable physical gift, but should have been far more dominent in his overall play. Loved his feet, can pull, lead, and adjust on the move, but he just wasn’t a consistent finisher. Needs to drop some body weight and improve stamina. Round 4 – 5 consideration
10	79	Hills	Tony	Texas U	OT	6051v	309v	5.20e
	Top prep tight end prospects in the country. Has overcome a great deal (physically) over the last 5 years (drop foot) and broke his ankle vs Texas Tech this past season. Has LOT feet, but also showed a tendency to overset and had a difficult time redirecting in space. A team is going to have to be patient with this player, but he has athletic ability long arms and the ability to bend his knees. Could well in time be a high rewards second day surprise. Round 5 – 7
11	78	Giacomini	Breno	Louisville U	OT	6071v	304vv	5.10v	J
	Great looking physically. Outstanding prep basketball player. First year regular. Former tight end in their jumbo package. Runs extremely well, is very athletic, has good feet, physical and one nasty SOB on the ball field. Does need a lot of work with position technique, hand placement and most importantly his core strength. Didn’t show good bend on his pass sets, thus limiting his anchor. Has a lot of tools. Round 4 to 5 consideration
12	79	Richardson	Barry	Clemson U	OT	6065v	320v	5.49v	E
	Athletic big man who flashed excellent body control. (nimble) Light on his feet with good blocing range (can get out to the second level. . On pass protection, has the athletic ability to counter and mirror defensive movement. Has been a regular since his freshman season, but I felt his mechanics were not particularly advanced. Just doesn’t play heavy.and to my way of thinking and not a natural knee bender. Round 4 – 5 , based on his natural gifts
13	77	Dunlap	King	Auburn U	OT	6084v	311v	5.27v	I
	Has been just an verage worker. Huge frame with long limbs, but was underdeveloped. Showed little in the way of tenacity or toughness. Marginal knee bender and power in his hands (might be too tall). I’m bothered by the fact that he still needs to be pushed on and off field. Would also question his willingness to play through things. Wouldn’t trust on the left ot a left tackle. 5th to 6th round consideration based primarily on his rare size.
14	79	Bell	Demetrius	Northwestern St (LA)	OT	6053v	300v	5.21v	F
	Recruited to play college basketball. Has only played 3 seasons of football. Former DE who was moved to LOT . 2007 Sub – division All American. Very good athlete, but lack both strength and power in his play. I was impressed with his pass sets, feet, body quickness, and overall playing range, but I wonder if he is strong enough to get push at the next level. Good hand placement. At least two year’s away from being contributing to winning
15	54	Clark	Corey	Texas A&M	OT	6053v	315v	5.33v	F
	Might want to consider projecting this player down inside. Didn’t like his consistently high pad level when engaging defenders inline, but played on his feet and stayed with his blocks for the most part. Limited striking power. This guy wasn’t pretty, but found a way to fet it done in the end. Would give late round draft consideration within the league (6th to 7th).
16	76	Brown	Duane	Virginia Tech	OT	6041v	314v	4.94v	I
	A former tight end who started two seasons on the right side before moving to the left side as a senior. Never saw him finish inline (didn’t show playing strength or much in the way of toughness). Really struggled with big people. I did like his feet and body balance on pass protection, but was bull rushed and had problems with his anchor. Not as good as he should be, but has too much athleetic potnetial to throw in the scrap heap. Round 6- 7.
17	77	Polumbus	Tyler	Colorado U	OT	6074v	312v	5.23v	F
	A big man with short arms. Is a try hard guy, but was limited athletically. Has a particularly high center of gravity. Gets shoulders out over his pads consistently when blocking inline (top heavy). Not a big finisher (legs trail). On the ground too frequently. Marginal body quickness. Is going to have problems blocking on the edge or handling the inside counter.
18	54	Dunbar	Franklin	Middle Tennessee	OT	6046v	327v	5.63v	F
	A massive, very strong (lower half) prospect who has been a starter at the LOT position for 3 seasons. The only true hardship case in this year’s draft. Is not a nifty, quick footed, dancing bear on the outside and doesn’t have any LOT potential at the next level. Lacks agility, body quickness, balance, bend and footwork. At the outset is going to have a very difficult time when the bullet start to fly (game pace). A solid person but strictly a developmental prospect.
19	72	Fladell	Mike	Rutgers U	OT	6061v	328v	5.40e
	Big wide body, who was generally non explosive on contact. Lack balance and body control particularly in space. Hits and goes to the ground. Needs to develop a great deal of body strength, particularly in his legs. Might well have been too tall to play inside at guard (LOG) position. Could develop, but the club that invests in him will have to dedicate a great deal of time to this project. Priority free agent.
20	75	Byrne	Mike	Delaware U	OT	6050v	296v	5.45e
	An Experienced competitive player. Has a good frame and size and strength potential. Is an agile big man. Agile big man with adequate playing and blocking range. Showed little in the way of power or explosion inline to get movement and sustain blocks. Falls off too many blocks (doesn’t bring feet) nor does he play heavy. Has some upside, but at this stage is at best a priority free agent.
21	75	Garner	Nate	Arkansas U	OT	6040e	325e	5.60e
	Is a big (bad body) guy who came on as a senior (late bloomer). Not a fast twitch athlete, but cam eoff the ball, stayed on his feet and sustained his blocks far more effectively then I had expected. On pass protection, short set effectively and although doesn’t have a whole lot of range showed some potential in this area. More of a mass then explosive hit up through guy. Much improved hand use. Priority free agent prospect.

1	71	Albert	Branden	Virginia U	OG	6055v	309v	5.20v	I
	Junior eligible player with excellent size, range and athletic ability. Pass sets were quick and efficient. Good stunt awareness, feet and range. Good knee bender. As a run blocker, engages quickly with good hand placement and sustain. Very impressive on his pull and lead. Can improve his overall body strength, but I saw little else that I didn’t like with this player’s game. Round # 1
2	66	Rachal	Chilo	USC	OG	6050v	315v	5.26v	I
	Missed some time due to injury in 07. Very physical and strong. Excellent punch and ability to move his feet. Liked his pull and lead skills. Good power in his hands. Excellent finisher. Should become a productive professional very quickly. Hits up and works for position after contact. Good body balance. Adequate to reach playside. Might be a tear away from factoring, but has a good deal of talent. Round # 2
3	75	Cousins	O’Niel	Texas-El Paso	OG	6036v	308v	5.04v	I
	Impressive Senior Bowl practice effort. Has good inline power and the ability to finish people. Good hand placement and ability to steer and stick on blocks. Reaches effectively and runs his feet on contact. Powerful guy who plays on his feet. On pass pro, his mass and ability to drop his base, enables him to handle the bull rush. Inconsistent with his kick/slide (depth and width). A high ceiling player with natural tools. Round 2 draft potnetial
4	79	Greco	John	Toledo U	OG	6046v	305v	5.26v	F
	An impressive athlete with good feet and strength, size and athletic ability. Looked natural on the left size, but due to his limited arm length would project this player down inside. Liked his work on pass protection (sets, kick step and striking power). A knee bender with striking power and savvy. Liked his balance points and recovery skills. Under the radar player who has a chance to play a very long time. Smart and aware. Round 2 – 3.
5	75	McGlynn	Mike	Pittsburgh U	OG	6042v	311v	5.41v	F
	College ROT. Is a big sucker (small hands), who impressed me with his work at OG during Senior Bowl workouts. Strong and efficient in a limited area. Not as nifty or quick as one would want, but was physical, and was an adequate to good finisher. Struggled with the quick edge rusher on the outside (gets his feet crossed some). Some block point balance problem. Solid journeyman prospect. Has solid 3rd to 4th round potential.
6	60	Radovich	Drew	USC	OG	6044v	301v	5.38v	F
	Versatile player with surprising athletic skills & versatility. Can swing between the tackle and guard positions. Need to improve his overall upper body strength but I like his toughness. More then adequate bend and playing savvy. Comes off the ball & hit up with more then adequate punch. Good hand placement and fits. Efficient short set and extend. See him as a valuable back up at the pro level. Round 3 – 4 draft potential.
7	67	Schuening	Roy	Oregon St	OG	6035v	306v	5.32v	F
	Is a good technician who was both smart and experienced.. Not as explosive as a run blocker as I expected. Good to short set and mirror. Limited playing range. Some inconsistency in 07. Needs to take better angles and improve efficiency at the second level. Marginal to reach playside. Is never going to be a great one, but has the ability to become a regular in time within the league. Draft round 3 – 4
8	61	Felton	Robert	Arkansas U	OG	6035v	313v	5.54v	F
	A big thick, bad body guy with good upper body strength and quickness, but had some contact balance problems (on the ground too frequently) Feet had a tendency to stall on contact. Got to second level & was able to hit up turn and wall defender. On pass protection, I liked his setting quicks, feet and movement, although I didn’t he get consistent lockout. Will need to keep his weight under control, but is a smart and versatile player. Round 4 draft consideration
9	74	Barton	Kirk	Ohio St	OG	6043v	310v	5.30e	F
	Much better suited physically and from an athletic standpoint to play down on the inside. Tough kid with some playing experience. Doesn’t kick butt, but also doesn’t get his butt kicked. Has a tendency to engage with his hands from the outside the defenders frame and doesn’t alway bring his feet with him. Not real effective adjusting to movement off the LOS. On pass pro, anchored well on his short sets. Problems with speed out on the edge. Rd 4 – 5.
10	77	Rinehart	Chad	Northern Iowa U	OG	6051v	320v	5.34v	F
	Not impressive from a physical standpoint but was technically sound, very tough and understands the game. Would project down inside to a guard position. Has a good understanding of angles and he wasn’t on the ground a great deal. Good to scoop, but wasn’t real effecient at the second level. Is a journeyman player who gives you some versatility and experience. Not a supple easy moving athlete. Solid mid to late second day selection (Rd 5-7).
11	73	Bernadeau	Mackenzy	Bentley College	OG	6041v	304v	5.27v	F
	An athletic, explosive and tough individua,, who can run and adjust in space. Showed good ball smarts, adjusted well on the move and had some nasty in him. Pass sets, feet and use of hands were impressive given his limited background. Missed last 3 games of the 07 season with an MCL injury. Dominates the competition. Similar to Jahri Evans (Saints) in playing style although might not be his equal as an athlete. Has 4th to 5th round draft potential.
12	55	Thomas	Donald	Connecticut U	OG	6033v	303v	5.06v	I
	The big question is whether he going to be big enough? Has good upper body strength, but his feet often stalled on contact inline. Tried to muscle people rather then hitting up and working around defender. Tough nasty individual who has an edge about him. On pass pro, was effectively able to anchor once he locked on with his hands. Base has a tendency to get too wide I didn’t like the way his toes turned out. Mid to late round draft potential (4 -6).
13	63	Crummey	Andrew	Maryland U	OG	6045v	301v	5.36v	F
	Is big, smart & experienced player with knowhow. Comes out of a balanced stance, was adequate on his get off but was not a consistent finisher.. Just not a power player. Feet tended to stall on contact . On pass pro, I didn’t think his feet were quick, played, rigid & didn’t get consistent lock out. Overall, I didn’t see special skills, but I believe he has shown enough good things to make a club in a back up role. Round 6 to 7 consideration.
14	74	Murphy	Shawn	Utah St	OG	6037v	320v	5.21v	F
	Tough, strong, highly physical and versatile (LOT in 06 – LOG in 07). Son of former Braves baseball great Dale Murphy. J.C. transfer, who is very much a work in progress. Former DE. Comes off the ball showing good balance points. Works to sustain, but was not particularly explosive on contact. Can pull, lead and adjust on the move. On pass pro, is going to needs work on his hand use and set more efficiently. Draft consideration 5th – 7th.
15	59	Scott	Walter	Kentucky U	OG	6032v	298v	4.91v	J
	Former TE and defensive linemen. First year regular. Good athlete, but did not play particularly strong (can’t move big people inline). Did show some shock on the snap but not a big finisher. I do like his feet, balance and bend, but is just not ready at this time. Late developmental prospect who could pay big dividends. Good smarts and playing intangibles. Draft consideration round # 6 to 7.
16	70	Clark	Devin	New Mexico U	OG	6035v	313v	5.29v	F
	A mauler who showed the ability to bend his knees. Better suited to play down inside. Can make a club based on ability, but is going to have to become more accountable off the field (need to check some off his off the field incidents). Good pass pro skills (liked his sets and range). A mauler who played with some tenacity. Playing ROT, but is better suited to move down inside (OG). Has a chance to become a good one. Late round consideration.
17	54	Young	Eric	Tennessee U	OG	6035v	310v	5.25e	I
	First season at the LOT position. Appeared top heavy. Doesn’t play with a lot of power. Comes off the ball well, but doesn’t climb or finish consistently. At the second level or on the backside, was quick to do little. Feet and pass sets were solid, but again doesn’t get lockout and was not strong on his feet. Just does not bend well and lacks power. A waist bender although he covers ground and showed. Finesse rather then he is a power player. Round 6th to 7th.
18	71	Zuttah	Jeremy	Rutgers U	OG	6033v	303v	5.07v	I
	Good size and lots room to grow with his frame. Outstanding test athlete, but lacked functional playing strength. Played consistently straight legged and was stiff in his hips. A non knee bender in the classic sense. Playing a ROT, but is better suited to play inside. On pass pro, his lack of balance points will always limit this player (gets driven back). Adequate college player with tools, but has a very long way to go. Needs position refinement. Draft # 7
19	53	Gibson	Mike	California U	OG	6034v	305v	5.29v	F
	Is an athletic big man who appeared more natural on the right side then his current LOT position. Is a versatile player, who although is better suited inside, could lineup in a pinch at the tackle spot. Didn’t see him as having a lot of functional playing strength at this time (legs stall on contact), but appeared to have more then adequate feet and contact balance. Would give late round draft consideration, but is more likely a priority free agent prospect.
20	68	McDuffie	Chris	Clemson U	OG	6041v	330v	5.35e	F
	Proto type look physically although lacks functional playing strength (gets his pads up consistently). Didn’t consistently come off the ball and lacks rear power to get movement inline. Plays hard but was barely an adequate athlete. All of his success and effectiveness was in a short area. Hate to give up on a big man, but this isn’t a quick fix type player. Late consideration, but is more likely a priority free agent player
21	77	Sosa	Pedro	Rutgers U	OG	6035v	300v	5.35e	F
	LOT starter, but is far better suited to play down inside (Doesn’t play heavy and lacks the foot quickness to play out on an island). Inline flashed take off quicks, but feet generally stopped on contact. Catch and steer guy who lacked short area explosiveness. On pass pro, is a classic waist bender who will have consistent problems with balance. Not a bad athlete, but has a lot of things that need to be fixed. 7th round or PFA.
22	75	Schwartz	Geoffrey	Oregon U	OG	6061v	332v	5.39v	F
	An absolute giant!. Has decent footwork and effectiveness in a limited area. Not particularly tough and had real problems with speed people on the edge. If he can front up a defender and get his hands on them has a chance to roster. Missed much of 07 due to injury. Has long snap skills which further enhance his playing chances. Late consideration, but is more likely a free agent player within the league.

1	78	Lichtensteiger	Kory	Bowling Green	OC	6022v	298v	5.28v	G
	Four year regular. Very good player although not impressive to look at physically (short arms). Good balance and quick feet. Very tough and nasty. Very smart and aware (makes all front calls). Quick to the second level. Shows good knee bend and leverage on his blocks. Struggled with big people on pass protection, but never stopped working. A blue coller player, who plays the game with passion and heart. Has strong second day draft consideration.
2	76	Pollak	Mike	Arizona St	OC	6034v	301v	4.99v	I
	A good serviceable football player, but I didn’t think he was particularly strong or effective at the point of attack. but going to have some real problem with big people inside. Is smart, experienced took good angles and plays on his feet. On pass pro, looked around well, was a good knee bender and overall athletic skills. Not a nasty individual and is never going to be a big finisher, but has solid play skills and should become a steady swingman inside. Round 4 – 5
3	74	Justice	Steve	Wake Forest U	OC	6033v	290v	5.29v	G
	Has a pre existent condition which required his parents had to sign a waiver in order to play at Wake each season (no apparent effect in his play). Has athletic ability, experience and intelligence. Good athlete with toughness. Can reach effectively playside. Had problems with big people on his nose. Lacks core strength and rear power. Solid football player who could develop into a steady professional.
4	78	Sullivan	John	Notre Dame	OC	6034v	301v	5.39v	F
	Disappointed with his play in 2007. Is an experienced hand with intelligence, but was surprisingly not a natural knee bender (extensive wrestling background) and didn’t get consistent fits inline. On pass pro didn’t appear able to drop his base and make a stand vs a power rush. Had some very untimely gun snap errors in 07. Round 5 to 7 draft consideration.
5	70	Wallace	Cody	Texas A&M	OC	6042v	296v	5.31v	F
	Over achiever. Not a supple athlete, but is tough, experienced and durable. Had problems with people on his nose. Not strong at the point of attack. Just adequate contact balance. Tough, nasty individual. Journeyman player who has the potential to fill in at the OG spot. Problems with the bull rush. If he goes to a club that employs a zone blocking scheme (slide protection) could play a long time. Mid to late second day draft consideration (5 – 6).
6	71	Richard	Jameson	Buffalo U	OC	6046v	297v	5.12v	F
	A limited athlete, but was tough, strong, and very physical. Gets after people and showed better then expected upper body leverage. Good angles to 2nd level, but was inconsistent to sustain. Will also overplay or miss the target. On pass protection, showed adequate anchor when working against the bull rush. Is going to need some work, but was very pleased with his work throughout the season. Would give 6th to 7th round draft consideration.
7	69	Spanos	Matt	USC	OC	6053v	322v	5.39v	F
	Stepped into a starting role with an injury this past year and played far better then expected. Is both big and strong, but was not an explosive player. . Walls off effectively and worked well in tandem. Improved with each passing game. Not an especially good athlete but will fight you to the end. Played much of the season with a triceps injury which need to be repaired. Has an outside chance of being drafted, but is more likely a priority free agent within the league.
8	67	Miller	Drew	Florida U	OC	6046v	302v	5.30e	F
	Doesn’t play big. Lacks functional playing strength and finishing skills. Is smart and plays with savvy, but will have a particularly tough time blocking big people at the next level. On pass protection,I didn’t think he had near enough physical ability to handle a professional defender. Is smart, experienced and has lined up at both OG and the OC position, but lacks the necessary skills to play. Marginal free agent.
9	72	Bujnoch	Glen	Cincinnati U	OC	6046v	285v	5.24v	G
	Dad (Glen) played with the Bengal’s. Undersized player with limited play strength. Great kid with size potential, experience and good intangibles. I thought he played too rigid. Playing a tackle position, but did work at the center position in the spring and appears physically far better suited to project inside in the professional ranks. Will have get stronger and to do a far better job of keeping his pads down to play the OC position, but has a chance.